ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   TV Chat (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   The Disappearance of Madeleine McCann - March 15 on Netflix (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=355028)

Saph 24-03-2019 10:55 AM

tbf I always blamed the parents and thought they'd been involved, but like most other people after watching it I kinda believe they had nothing to do with it now..

Vicky. 24-03-2019 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 10485756)
“The McCann case I don't know that muich about”

-proceeds to write a dissertation-

:fan:

I’d be interested to see if your opinion changes after watching it, either way

Fair point :joker:

Genuinely cannot see anything changing my mind, especially when it appears they left large inconsistencies out purposely. Really just sounds like more same old same old, 'loads of pedos in the area!' 'dogs can be wrong' 'bungling Portuguese police' etc :laugh:

Niamh. 24-03-2019 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 10485731)
This might have been answered but am just replying as I see posts tbh, should read thread first...

Gerrys explanation for the dogs indication in the hire car was that they had been transporting seabass and rotten nappies in the boot and thats what the dogs picked up :rolleyes:

Also I am sure at one stage it was that the handler was biased against them and made the dogs indicate..

No I know what Gerrys explanation was but I mean what the documentary used as an explanation. .



Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Vicky. 24-03-2019 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10485767)
No I know what Gerrys explanation was but I mean what the documentary used as an explanation. .

Oh right yeah..

Will likely end up watching it at some stage, but 8 hours of spin..doesn't really interest me. Have heard the excuses and totally mad theories a hundred times before.

For anyone who has watched it, was the Gaspar statement brought up..about basically Payne being a pedo himself? It seems this was designed to make people think the parents were innocent, so I will be very very shocked if this was included mind D:

Niamh. 24-03-2019 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 10485771)
Oh right yeah..



Will likely end up watching it at some stage, but 8 hours of spin..doesn't really interest me. Have heard the excuses and totally mad theories a hundred times before.



For anyone who has watched it, was the Gaspar statement brought up..about basically Payne being a pedo himself? It seems this was designed to make people think the parents were innocent, so I will be very very shocked if this was included mind D:

Netflix have a lot to answer for imo that ****ing Steve Avery ****e aswell. Poor old Goncalo is made out to be a villain aswell apparently

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Vicky. 24-03-2019 11:21 AM

Ah just seen a post by someone who watched it too..no mention of the blue holdall (that was large enough 'to hide a tennis racket' in apparently :umm2: ) going missing either.

Niamh. 24-03-2019 11:30 AM

This is a good article too

https://laidbareblog.blogspot.com/20...canns.html?m=1

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Vicky. 24-03-2019 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10485783)
This is a good article too

https://laidbareblog.blogspot.com/20...canns.html?m=1

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Quote:

Kate was worried enough to keep checking the kids, but not motivated enough to take them to hospital, raise the alarm, or ask any of her equally qualified colleagues to examine them.

From that, I conclude that they were drugged, but not by a stranger

Despite their claims, there is no record that they made an officer aware of their suspicions.

From that, I conclude that if they were drugged, it was not by a stranger.

No record exists of them telling the police in any interview about their suspicions.

From that, I conclude that they deliberately withheld this information. That does not indicate a stranger

No testing was done until such time had passed that no interpretation of the results could be precise. The motive for testing at all was to return a negative result for Kate.

In conclusion, I can find no earthly reason why any parent believing they have two infants who have been sedated by a stranger would fail to seek help, tell the police and have them tested.

I can find many reasons why they might fail to do the above if they were responsible for the sedating, though.
Spot on.

Smithy 24-03-2019 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 10485771)
Oh right yeah..

Will likely end up watching it at some stage, but 8 hours of spin..doesn't really interest me. Have heard the excuses and totally mad theories a hundred times before.

For anyone who has watched it, was the Gaspar statement brought up..about basically Payne being a pedo himself? It seems this was designed to make people think the parents were innocent, so I will be very very shocked if this was included mind D:

No it wasn’t

GoldHeart 24-03-2019 01:37 PM

I haven't watched the Netflix film , but on YouTube there was a very interesting video about Madeleine. And the more & more the pieces of puzzle are fit together the more guilty the parents seem.

Their behaviour is NOT normal ! :suspect: .

I'm guessing all the Netflix film can do is speculate while showing news footage of the case , we'll never find out what happened. But I think Madeline was possibly drugged or hit her head and it was covered up .


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.