His age is relevant to the point that a 90+ year old woman is hardly going to grab her 61 year old son by the scruff of the neck and drag him kicking and screaming in a car and take him to a police station...
The U.S say they have asked him to cooperate but it’s been denied by the Palace...he could I guess be sopaenad and if he does then we will be sure to know about it.

Money and favours will be exchanged, and it will be buried, it always is. It's how the upper class functions.

...my skin is the perfect thickness, Jet...your passive aggressiveness is not so perfect, though...as you can imagine if it were being aimed at you...I’d appreciate it if you don’t direct it to me at all, when it isn’t necessary or justified...

I agree.

Plus can anyone rational possibly really see if the USA demands his presence there.

The Queen and the government via the Home office and courts would have to agree to that.

Does anyone rational likely see any possibility of that happening.
Not a chance of it I'd say to that.

there will have to be some very serious allegation made against Andrew before he would face any criminal charges and even then i think they would claim diplomatic immunity as he was working for the government for much of the time in question. To sum up, Andrew knows he is unlikely to face any consequences so he won't cooperate with the investigation

...I would say that he was told to step back fro. Royal duties ...(...I don’t know actually if his mother asked him to or whether he made that decision himself...)...and keep a low profile ...it’s been said that he’s refused to answer questions and for a regular person, it would be a long process to extradite them to the USA...but for a a member of the royal family, I have no idea how long it would take, if it was possible at all...

Puts him on par with the American ‘Diplomats wife who used Diplomatic immunity after killing that young boy....it’s all wrong.

...I don’t know the legality but it was said at the time that he was strongly advised not to do the interview because in doing it, it would mean that he would no longer have his right to diplomatic immunity...

Can someone care to answer this please.

It often is by many, I don't complain every time though.
Can you explain to me what is passive aggressive about saying 'Come on Ammi'?
It was a reaction to how I felt about your words. Now I feel I need to tread carefully around you and react to you differently than to everyone else. Fine, If that's what you need.

I'm wondering the same thing tbh , but I guess because he's PRINCE Andrew he's untouchable.

*sigh*

Nobody is expecting the Queen to take him down to the local police station like a mum that's found out their kid robbed someone's garden gnome and wants to give him a scare.

The palace are blatantly protecting him though and lying, people have gone on TV multiple times to say that he was asked to help investigations and he still hasn't and most likely will never help until he is forced to do so.

You only have to post a link to Andrew's interview to see what everyone thought about him..

This is new..

You do know he knew meghan as well yeah.:shrug:

Can you point out to me where I said I believed him? Honestly, read what is actually said instead of making things up.

What are we supposed to be comparing amy jade?

Ah ok ..andrew v meghan and harry..

Andrew's an obvious creep, a paedo..one who harry looked up to and judging by the old photos we have seen off him out his tits, one probably influenced by his uncle.


He goes on to marry a ****e actress, one his senior, one married before.. one obviously given roles cause shes done the casting couch..

3 immoral waste of spaces in one way or another.