Crimson Dynamo |
29-10-2022 10:19 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
(Post 11222718)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
(Post 11222748)
SPARE. :laugh:
It’s £28 a copy to hear ‘Harry’s truth’. It’ll be all over the media anyway for free. If it’s anything like Meghan’s ‘truth’ it will be a load of codswallop.
Apparently he’s taken some bits out, following the Queen’s death, which is why it’s been delayed. He obviously didn’t care about the alive Queen’s reaction to it, but after the shock of seeing how popular the Monarchy are with how the public reacted to the Queen's death, he's running scared, poor thing.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
(Post 11222762)
They have departed company with their publicity team, Sunshine Sachs, who were hired to further their ambitions as a ‘dynamic duo’; the alternative and more popular Royals in the USA and make them loadsa money. After many headaches and getting back the millions the dynamic duo owed them, Sunshine Sachs are breathing a sigh of relief.
Now for the damage control. Their new team is pushing them as wholesome, regular Joe’s, misrepresented and misunderstood. Meghan, in her recent interview, said of their Netflix docuseries that the producers may not present it the way she and Harry would, distancing herself already, :laugh: and Harry has been begging for parts of his book to be axed, but the publishers may not have agreed with everything he wanted.
It will be the producers and the publishers fault if H&M’s own words and actions aren't well received, naturally. :laugh:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie
(Post 11222787)
The title pretty much confirms how narked he is at being the spare, thought he wanted out of all things Royal :hehe:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusticgal
(Post 11222841)
He used to tease William about not having the responsibilities that William was going to have….he needs to make up his mind :laugh:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arista
(Post 11222849)
Yes well Over Priced
Harry Got the 15Million Dollars
Only the Proceeds go to Charity
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smudgie
(Post 11222892)
Had an email from hmv that you can preorder for £14.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic Mock
(Post 11222899)
Horrible title, I agree.
Tbf he might've put in some negative stuff about Elizabeth in the Book that might be seen as in poor taste given that she's only just passed away.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
(Post 11222904)
But he wouldn't mind a frail old lady, his own grandmother, actually reading negative stuff he said about her?
He and Meghan trashed the institution the Queen had given her life to while her husband was on his deathbed.
No Mock, imo he's only worried about how himself and his ghastly wife will be perceived.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arista
(Post 11222916)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic Mock
(Post 11222918)
Well I don't know his relationship with some of his other family members, maybe he doesn't care about offending them.
But we all know that he had a good relationship with Elizabeth, he weren't gonna trash her in public when she's dead.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
(Post 11223036)
https://pagesix.com/2022/10/13/princ...adicts-memoir/
Harry & Meghan ‘contradict’ their own stories in his tell-all, Netflix docuseries
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s docu-series will debut on Netflix in early December, multiple sources told Page Six — but there are still lots of conflicts.
Sources said Netflix and the series’ filmmakers were confused by some of the comments that Harry makes in his upcoming book being at odds with what he and his wife said on camera.
“A lot in the show contradicted what Harry has written, so that was an issue,” a senior Netflix source revealed.
“Then Harry and Meghan made significant requests [to filmmakers] to walk back content they themselves have provided, for their own project,” the source added.
—-------------
That’s what happens when you don’t tell the truth. You forget what story you peddled on your last pity party.
The book should have a disclaimer attached like The Crown is now doing, so that the gullible won’t think it’s all real.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
(Post 11223050)
Harry in a 2020 speech to rich bankers JP Morgan.
“I was in therapy for 7 years to to help me deal with my mothers death”.
He said it was William who encouraged him to get it.
Harry last week at the Masters of Scale summit for BetterUp.
“In the Royal family I never heard the word therapy.” It wasn’t until I met Meghan and she encouraged me to get it….
Meghan in a recent podcast:
“I remember at my worst point, (when she said she was suicidal) being finally connected to someone that my husband had found, a referral for me to call.”
Harry on Oprah, when asked what he had done to help Meghan when she was suicidal said
“I didn’t help her, I was too embarrassed to ask for help”.
Confused? You should be. So is Netflix. :laugh:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
(Post 11223053)
Hoisted by their own petard
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
(Post 11223056)
The title of the book has sparked reactions from royal commentators.
Angela Levin, royal biographer, suggested the title is a "resentful" Harry
"trying to get his own back" for the cruel jibe separating him from brother
and future monarch William.
She said: "Spare, the title of Harry's book is desperately sad. Is that what he
still thinks of himself? After all the therapy, a wife he worships and freedom
he longed for, he is still full of resentment and out to get his own back. You
can see it in his eyes on the cover."
Journalist Meghan McCain wrote: "I’m not as plugged into this as Brits are
clearly - but the title seems like a troll… Is this your take?"
Another journalist Rupert Myers commented: “Is this the real cover and title?
Good grief.”
“The book is supposed to be about a journey to love and healing but
the title speaks about bitterness and jealousy,” Verdad penned.
https://www.geo.tv/latest/448964-pri...-meghan-markle
Going down a storm and not even out yet... https://content.invisioncic.com/Mran...ns/popcorn.gif
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zizu
(Post 11223077)
It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..
All that has happened is that everyone has been programmed by the media into believing he is now the son of the devil whilst the real ‘unpleasant’ people like Andrew , Charles and Chlamydia are suddenly appealing and popular .
I bet Di is squirming in her grave as we speak
Bewildering stuff
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
(Post 11223087)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swan
(Post 11223088)
Yeah it's been said many times before, i guess from a logical standpoint it's annoying for regular people struggling with everyday life, then you have these 2 whining and preaching about this and that. Often non issues, or issues most other people haven't got room in their heads to worry about as putting food on the table isn't always a guarantee.
They have wealth, and status in life that 99.9% of people will never duplicate, and can only ever dream of. Instead of enjoying it, all they do is complain about it. It's annoying.
I do agree with the "if you stop talking about them they will go away" theory, but it's difficult when they're all over the media. It's kinda like Trump now, people still talk about him in unhealthy doses. But then he is current i guess, whether you like him or not. And for better or worse, so are Harry and Meghan.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide
(Post 11223089)
the thing is, now the queen has gone, no-one gives a flying **** what he says about the other royals. That's the truth of the matter. Obsessed twats like Piers Morgan will always blow hot air, but the bottom line is ..... no one gives a damn
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
(Post 11223090)
It's been over 2 years since the world and its auntie loved Harry. The sad thing is, he HAS changed, enormously. His family, former friends and army mates are worried about him. He has cut himself off from almost all of them.
Denying the change in him without doing research to find out what most people see won't change that fact.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
(Post 11223102)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
(Post 11223104)
:joker:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic Mock
(Post 11223113)
Tbf nobody wants to have their behaviour being scrutinised in public.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
(Post 11223145)
The fact that Kate and William are so loved and popular is the real reason behind Harry and his wifes anger
its plain jealousy
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet
(Post 11223300)
There is no strong debate.
Those of us who don’t like H&M explain why, or post items to back up our thinking. Time after time, the same people come in and offer nothing in the way of giving reasons why they disagree, they just use one liners to mock and insult posters. Whatever happened to the rule ‘talk about the topic, not other posters’.
Here are examples of those one liners from this thread - and there were more along the same lines which were removed:
Can’t stand them but obsessively talk about them at the first opportunity. If you can’t stand them stop talking about them
I’m sure you’ll all let everyone know what’s inside
It’s amazing how triggered y’all are
The only wobbles come from the fanatic mob
We're not interested in this, claim the most interested group of people on the planet
It’s a pity you don’t follow your own advice when it comes to tabloids
Some people have convinced themselves through the lack of their own life's that they know someone else's inside out.
Someone already made this joke yesterday. Do you ever have a thought that's your own
……………………
Where is the debate? Where are the posts in favour of H&M from these usual suspects to balance out the negative views? They are rare. Eventually, the thread descents into chaos, and is closed. They do it time after time.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic Mock
(Post 11223302)
Thanks for the compliment.:blush:
Personally I don't understand the full on dislike of H&M, but it's good to hear why other people do.
Honest advice I can give to people that don't like H&M is to focus on Celebrities that you do like, I've fallen into a similar trap myself with Cheryl Cole years ago, and I ended up driving myself crazy.
I honestly don't mean it as an attack.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper
(Post 11223363)
Meanwhile, the levels of debate or reasoned argument:
I don't know if you seriously think that this is an intellectual debate that's being had, and maybe it was at the beginning, but these are just joke threads these days, and that's not because of any mythical "4 posters", but because of what your side is offering.
|
actual content above your post
and look who are missing...
|