Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11242616)

And when all those things happened, there were threads on here and on social media, newspaper comments sections, articles etc etc slating them for their actions.

Just because they have done questionable things does not mean that people can not be quite rightyly disgusted when this article was published but Meghans main detractors are.all saying "yeah but they have done this..." There shoukd be no "yeah buts" when it is a perceived threat of violence toward another human.

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11242616)

And when all those things happened, there were threads on here and on social media, newspaper comments sections, articles etc etc slating them for their actions.

Just because they have done questionable things does not mean that people can not be quite rightyly disgusted when this article was published but Meghans main detractors are.all saying "yeah but they have done this..." There shoukd be no "yeah buts" when it is a perceived threat of violence toward another human.

Originally Posted by Kevin the Carrot (Post 11242617)

"when it is a perceived threat of violence toward another human"

did you post this when jo brand had her little moment

no

why

?

:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11242616)

And when all those things happened, there were threads on here and on social media, newspaper comments sections, articles etc etc slating them for their actions.

Just because they have done questionable things does not mean that people can not be quite rightyly disgusted when this article was published but Meghans main detractors are.all saying "yeah but they have done this..." There shoukd be no "yeah buts" when it is a perceived threat of violence toward another human.

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11242623)

Did I take part in a thread? Was there a thread? Do you know what my thoughts were? Nope, I didn't think so.....but continue deflecting mr LT :bored:

Edit......I've just checked that thread from June 2019 and I did not post at all in it....could it be that I didn't see it and I was busy? Could it be I had nothing to add as it was fairly well condemned or maybe I wasn't here at all?? Am I not allowed an opinion on this thread because I didn't post in that thread 3 years ago?

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11242625)

NOT from their supporters on here....and I didn't say 'but', I said I can think of worse things, which is perfectly true, wouldn't you agree?
The distress and sadness they brought to the Queen is not 'questionable things', it was downright cruelty of a dying woman. Horrendous. Unforgivable.
Her Lady in Waiting and others were devastated at the effect it had on her Majesty.
I have already condenmed Clarkson here for his stupid comment, unfortunately it doesn't work both ways.

Originally Posted by Kevin the Carrot (Post 11242626)

precisely..

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11242634)

Clarkson has apologised.

Lady Susan has apologised.

Have Meghan and Harry apologised yet?

NO.

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11242486)

You really went there :joker:

Comparing your hatred of Meghan to Hitler :joker: :joker:

And you’re not irrational? :joker: :joker: :joker:

Originally Posted by Christmas Neeve (Post 11242637)

For what?

Originally Posted by Christmas Neeve (Post 11242637)

For what?

Originally Posted by Kevin the Carrot (Post 11242563)

Im afraid the issue is firmly with the Editor who would have seen this piece and passed it instead of politely saying that "sorry Jez but that is too much in light of recent very public attacks on young women - I get your column is all tongue in cheek and that its refers to a GOT famous moment and that Markle is a narcissistic passive-aggressive annoyance but that is too far and will create a sh1tstorm"

That is her job and she did not do it.

Originally Posted by Christmas Neeve (Post 11242637)

For what?

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11242648)

I’ll treat that disingenuous enquiry with the contempt it deserves.

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy (Post 11242554)

It's his "opinion" to state that he wants to see her stripped naked and paraded through town having **** thrown at her?

That's not really an opinion, is it? I know he was exaggerating and that he thought he was being funny (he wasn't "joking", but he did think he was being funny) but I don't think the suggestion of gangs of ruddy faced blokes stripping and humiliating women "for their wrongs" in expressions of their sad, impotent rage should really fall in the realms of "just an opinion".

Drunkenly burped out in a pub it should get an eye-roll and ignored. Published in a national newspaper that's read by the exact sort of people who ould - unironically, and genuinely - like to see the people mentioned tarred and feathered ... it's just horrific.

As a "joke" it works better as a satire of the people who do genuinely get themselves emotional and upset thinking about a random celebrity and a family of dough-faced aristocrats.

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11242659)

Post some daily Mail articles to put her straight!!

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11242611)

I rest my case.

Originally Posted by Kevin the Carrot (Post 11242646)

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy (Post 11242671)

The title of this reads like a parody of what an AI would generate if you asked it to create a YouTube video for gammon to wank over.

Originally Posted by Kevin the Carrot (Post 11242563)

Im afraid the issue is firmly with the Editor who would have seen this piece and passed it instead of politely saying that "sorry Jez but that is too much in light of recent very public attacks on young women - I get your column is all tongue in cheek and that its refers to a GOT famous moment and that Markle is a narcissistic passive-aggressive annoyance but that is too far and will create a sh1tstorm"

That is her job and she did not do it.