As regards DW


A few interesting snippets…https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...689e755e87.png
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...6e0c4b4e4e.png
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...52e9689282.png
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...5a3eec2182.png
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...0af0a78e33.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It's definitely sketchy, but 17 is legal age in the UK.

I feel like the Media keep trying to find their next Meghan Markle when it comes to witch hunts with these Schofield, Edwards & Wootton probes, and look if any of them are guilty then fair enough, but I will try to assess them as innocent until proven guilty until there is 100% proof that one of them is guilty.

17 is not legal when it comes to explicit pictures. Look at any porn site on the internet and they say that all are over 18. That's why pervs get a kick out of getting pictures that are under 18, and why people like Huw pay such large sums of money

Fair enough.

I just thought that Porn sites put that up for American productions because the legal age over there is 18, fair enough if I'm wrong about that.

Either way on the legality front it's definitely odd that a guy in his 60's would want a 17 year old's nude pictures.

it's about power and exploitation. Rich pervs will pay serious cash to get their hands on porn that that isn't available through other means and 17 is the ideal age because its still wrong but they can try to use the plausible deniability defence

Fair point.

it all blew up when Traci Lords, an american porn star, appeared in hundreds of hardcore porn movies aged 15. The western world went crazy, the internet porn industry at that time was basically closed down. It was really crazy, there was a site called babylon that had completely cornered the market and were absolutely raking it in, but they hosted illegal stuff and that was the end of them

Jc! That's terrible.

Basically CP was hitting the mainstream (by Porn standards anyway) I'm honestly amazed that the industry managed to bounce back from that.

It also makes you wonder if similar dodgy practices have happened on other occasions, but have just never been caught.

All that in an attempt to protect Dan Wootton? Seem's unlikely, but who knows.

Have you never heard of the old blood on the windscreen threat?





me neither

Slick Liam

Can you please tell me why there is No Police
looking into this?

Wootton is being investigated by the police, you’ve already been told this multiple times

Strange
not seen it on any main news


with respect

Now that is something we agree on, it is strange that the majority of msm is completely silent on this story, especially considering how rabid they were about Schofield and Edwards, it would be very easy to assume that due to the allegations already made, he has something on very important people that as a result, do not want to get involved

No I mean
it should be every hour on Sky News and BBC News

And ITV, Ch4 Ch5

Yes you’re right, it should be, but it’s not and we can only assume or ask why

It is the only way
to get the Story Straight,

You need to take into account that Dan Wootton isn't anywhere near the level or Schofield and Edwards when it comes to popularity and being a household name. It'll never be top story news.

No it is not that


If the Police are looking into a Rape on another lad
it must go on Every News

Maybe this is stopping anyone being interested.....

A RENT boy who accused Dan Wootton of sexual assault in a viral Twitter post
was jailed for four years after he blackmailed four men in a ‘sex line sting’ and
has been described as a manipulative abuser and a “serial fantasist” who has
“never even met” the GB News presenter


:think:

"was jailed for four years after he blackmailed four men"


Sure LT
but Ch4HDnews for example
would mention the bad side of this fella
accusing DW.

they cant report on every chancer they have to stick to news and facts

By now, the Police must have something?