ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   BBC bans Michael Jackson music amidst child abuse claims (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=354764)

Alf 06-03-2019 06:35 PM

He's Bad

Marsh. 06-03-2019 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10467154)
Come on Marsh. .

There are loads of levels of pedophillia some like forcing etc...but Michael was like the football coaches..get a load of kids together and get them competing for your affection and praise..then see how they are with you showing them affection...

You forget the devious mind of a pedo, the thrill is almost as exciting if not more than the end result.


So if your target seems ammiacable enough for your jollies then fine..if not then someone else becomes a target. .and lets face facts here, the amount of worldwide kids dressing up as Michael sending letters to him and photos of them dressed up as him.....come on....the ****ers had all day to pick and chose.

So he's guilty because he had kids as fans all over the world?

Ariana Grande is fooked.

Beso 06-03-2019 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10467169)
So he's guilty because he had kids as fans all over the world?

Ariana Grande is fooked.

No...he's guilty because he took advantage of those kids and abused them.

Marsh. 06-03-2019 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10467171)
No...he's guilty because he took advantage of those kids and abused them.

Were you there?

Kazanne 06-03-2019 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10466970)
Did anyone watch the doc last night ( not flicking back through all pages ) ? IF I didnt think he was a guilty, dirty nonce before watching it ,I would sure be convinced he was after watching .........He bought his way out of jail as he had mega $$$ If a man on a normal wage was arrested for EXACTLY the same reasons as MJ,he would still be in prison today ....Money talks and buys freedom

Sorry Chuff I don't agree If I thought anyone had done that to my child no amount of money would suffice I would want justice, the documentary is supposed to make you believe the two guys, I'm not buying it from two proven liars and some
things I have read about them

Beso 06-03-2019 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10467177)
Were you there?

Where?

user104658 06-03-2019 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nancy. (Post 10467702)
The director of this documentary is a real piece of work.

In what sense? I watched it. I can see that he's getting frustrated but I also think it's fairly obvious that he wholeheartedly believes that the content of his documentary is the truth. I honestly can't see what in this clip results in him being branded "a piece of work" (other than that you clearly strongly believe in Michael Jackson's innocence and are thus incredulous about all of it).

Crimson Dynamo 06-03-2019 08:28 PM

Are we watching?

Marsh. 06-03-2019 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10467795)
In what sense? I watched it. I can see that he's getting frustrated but I also think it's fairly obvious that he wholeheartedly believes that the content of his documentary is the truth. I honestly can't see what in this clip results in him being branded "a piece of work" (other than that you clearly strongly believe in Michael Jackson's innocence and are thus incredulous about all of it).

Which is kind of dangerous when he skews everything just to fit what he thinks and disregards anything that doesn't suit the agenda.

But, you'll rarely, if ever, get a documentary like this that isn't in someway biased one way or the other. Even Making a Murderer left out huge swathes of information to paint the picture the director intended.

Marsh. 06-03-2019 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nancy. (Post 10467702)
The director of this documentary is a real piece of work. Watch this:


The random nonsensical Ted Bundy comparison. :joker:

bots 06-03-2019 08:39 PM

Taking an objective view, a statement made under oath takes precedence over one not under oath. There is no legal ramification for people lying their teeth off about events that happened years ago, when their subject is now dead.

That director is clearly not objective in his reasoning and that will have completely tainted his documentary. Does that mean Jackson is innocent? No it doesn't, but it doesnt mean he is guilty either

Kazanne 06-03-2019 08:40 PM

Bloody Hell Harrison Ford better be careful,he showed that kid how to use his bullwhip, this just seems to be the two guys reliving the fact they got to be with someone famous,the mother seems really enamoured by it all

Kazanne 06-03-2019 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10467912)
The random nonsensical Ted Bundy comparison. :joker:

And Piers didn't get very far when he was asking about the money factor of it all.

Niamh. 06-03-2019 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10467852)
Are we watching?

Yes grim

Crimson Dynamo 06-03-2019 08:55 PM

Ok so I kind of don't think he is lying

Marsh. 06-03-2019 08:57 PM

I kind of do think he is lying.

Kazanne 06-03-2019 08:58 PM

I think he is lying as he has form.

Crimson Dynamo 06-03-2019 09:01 PM

Is he gay?

Kazanne 06-03-2019 09:02 PM

I didn't really want to watch this at all as I didn't want to give creedence to that director as no doubt this will be a ratings smash and make him the money he knew it would,but if I want to make up my mind properly I have to watch it , but seen nothing yet as proof of what he is accused of.

Niamh. 06-03-2019 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10468048)
Ok so I kind of don't think he is lying

Me neither

Niamh. 06-03-2019 09:05 PM

I mean the relationships were weird as **** for an adult man to have with kids. How people can deny that is just odd

Twosugars 06-03-2019 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10467967)
Taking an objective view, a statement made under oath takes precedence over one not under oath. There is no legal ramification for people lying their teeth off about events that happened years ago, when their subject is now dead.

That director is clearly not objective in his reasoning and that will have completely tainted his documentary. Does that mean Jackson is innocent? No it doesn't, but it doesnt mean he is guilty either

Agree

Marsh. 06-03-2019 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10468089)
I mean the relationships were weird as **** for an adult man to have with kids. How people can deny that is just odd

Oh it was strange. Just not evidence of pedophilia.

Niamh. 06-03-2019 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10468115)
Oh it was strange. Just not evidence of pedophilia.

It's highly unlikely to be anything else though lbr

Crimson Dynamo 06-03-2019 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10468115)
Oh it was strange. Just not evidence of pedophilia.

Well a man saying he wanked him off as a child would be a start

Kazanne 06-03-2019 09:14 PM

Considering their ages at the time they have extraordinary memories. Blasey- Ford was mocked because she couldn't remember some details about her own sexual abuse when she was seventeen.

Kazanne 06-03-2019 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10468130)
Well a man saying he wanked him off as a child would be a start

A man who could also be lying

Niamh. 06-03-2019 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10468148)
A man who could also be lying

Even taking out everything they say, just what we could actually see is ****ed up

Kazanne 06-03-2019 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10468169)
Even taking out everything they say, just what we could actually see is ****ed up

What have you seen that has ****ed you up :shrug:

Niamh. 06-03-2019 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10468188)
What have you seen that has ****ed you up :shrug:

Oh Kazanne [emoji1787] like you would have left your kids sleep with a 30 odd year old "lonely" man and think nothing of it, come off the stage

AnnieK 06-03-2019 09:29 PM

Kaz, serious question....were/are you a massive MJ fan? I'm struggling a little to understand that you don't think its slightly weird that a grown man would think its ok to share a bed with a child....and you still defend it. I agree hugely with TS in that whether or not you think anything dodgy went on or not, you have to see that the way he swapped his "favourites" as they aged is not strange at best, cruel at worst? Even if the sexual abuse didn't happen, what he did is is abuse to a child that age, in their mind its tantamount to neglect and abandonment.

Vicky. 06-03-2019 09:29 PM

I need to watch this latest documentary I think. I do think its highly likely he was dodgy as ****. Yes I think its partly to do with his own life but, thats not really an excuse. I do suspect that some parents of the kids who were sent to stay at his were seeking compensation..because come on, everyone knew the rumours, which responsible parent would allow their kid to sleep in a bed with him? Really. This does not mean the kids were complicit in their own abuse mind, but I do think some of the parents are suspect.

And also, I love MJs music, a lot of it anyway. Its going to be a bit of a pain in the arse if it ends like Glitters, where I am not allowed to play it at work as a lot of his songs are instant dancefloor fillers!

Crimson Dynamo 06-03-2019 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10468148)
A man who could also be lying

I'm relatively old and Iv had a life. I've studied criminals at degree level, I'm not daft, Iv been to jail's, nothing Iv seen tonight says they are lying

Niamh. 06-03-2019 09:36 PM

I agree though the parents were totally irresponsible and failed to protect their children

Crimson Dynamo 06-03-2019 09:38 PM

Star struck

Kazanne 06-03-2019 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10468248)
Oh Kazanne [emoji1787] like you would have left your kids sleep with a 30 odd year old "lonely" man and think nothing of it, come off the stage

I would not ,but people are different and the ones mother said he was like a son so, she let him besides I doubt his bed or bedroom was a tiny little space like most are ,so even if they were in bed together I doubt they were side by side,and he did sleep on the floor a lot people always assume people cant sleep together without getting sexual,you can I've done it myself.I am not denying he was strange but I do not believe these two so far,and why if it was so awful has the one guy kept the jewellery MJ brought him,? give me facts and I will get off the stage.

Niamh. 06-03-2019 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10468282)
I would not ,but people are different and the ones mother said he was like a son so, she let him besides I doubt his bed or bedroom was a tiny little space like most are ,so even if they were in bed together I doubt they were side by side,and he did sleep on the floor a lot people always assume people cant sleep together without getting sexual,you can I've done it myself.I am not denying he was strange but I do not believe these two so far,and why if it was so awful has the one guy kept the jewellery MJ brought him,? give me facts and I will get off the stage.

I don't care if you change your mind or not, you already said enough by answering that question, no responsible parent would allow their 7 year old child share a bedroom with some 30 year old guy because it's dodgy as **** and he's dodgy as ****

Kazanne 06-03-2019 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10468273)
I'm relatively old and Iv had a life. I've studied criminals at degree level, I'm not daft, Iv been to jail's, nothing Iv seen tonight says they are lying

I'm not doubting that, The FBI secretly investigate Michael Jackson for four years - tracking his where abouts, his computers, phone calls, etc and release a 300 plus page file completely vindicating him, stating there was absolutely nothing to even remotely suggest he was an abuser, and the general public (and media) completely ignores it. Yet two admitted liars and perjurers (one of which who even refers to himself as a ‘master of deception’) can come out with a completely one sided, sensationalist story (yes story not documentary) which contains literally no evidence whatsoever (and is full of inconsistencies) and a large majority of the public doesn’t even question it.

The jurors who found Michael Jackson not guilty in his 2005 trial agree with the FBI. Juror Paulina Coccoz said: ‘It was pretty obvious there was no molestation done...it was pretty obvious that there were ulterior motives on behalf of the family. And the mother, she orchestrated the whole thing..there wasn’t a shred of evidence’.

Just because a story is graphic and disturbing doesn’t make it factual. Before you judge anything do your research. Facts don’t lie, people do.

The bottom line is..

If you want to view Michael Jackson as a pedophile, you will. It’s easy to do. He admitted to allowing children to sleep in his bedroom (which itself is the same size as a small two story house) and has been accused of child molestation more then once. He’s not the guy next door, was undeniably eccentric, and most certainly didn’t live a conventional life.

But to anyone who has bothered to look into the allegations against him - and I mean really look into them - there is more than enough evidence to demonstrate that he was a victim of extortion and of copycat false claims for the past twenty five years. Yet despite the Los Angeles Police Department stating that Jackson should be presumed to be innocent, despite a jury finding him not guilty on every single charge against him, despite the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services twice investigating and clearing him of wrongdoing, despite the FBI conducting a very thorough investigation in which no evidence of wrongdoing was found, and despite the cash grab lawsuits of his posthumous accusers being tossed out of court, the court of public opinion may sadly be what defines this saga and a large part of his legacy.

AnnieK 06-03-2019 09:45 PM

In all honesty kaz, I feel you are answering as a fan rather than a mum. Whether he slept on the floor, in a twin bed or strapped to the roof, he was a grown man wanting to sleep in the same room / area / bed as a kid that he wasn't related to. Any way I look at that, its wrong......from the parents view, wtf, anyone asked that to me with my son regardless of the status, riches or whatever, just no....but MJ was an adult....he was wrong. Then after doing whatever, dropping them for a younger midel is sick, cruel etc etc

Ill tell you what, had it been my kid he'd ****ed with, death would be preferable...sexual or emotional abuse

Kazanne 06-03-2019 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10468285)
I don't care if you change your mind or not, you already said enough by answering that question, no responsible parent would allow their 7 year old child share a bedroom with some 30 year old guy because it's dodgy as **** and he's dodgy as ****

You can swear as much as you like ,it doesn't make him guilty of being an abuser your opinion is valid to you ,as mine is to me, here we have two liars against a dead man.The parents were irresponsible but they got what they wanted out of it


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.