ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Anyone following the Amber and Johnny trial? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=380495)

bots 20-06-2022 10:58 AM

i said way back when Britney regained control that we hadn't heard the last from Jamie Spears, so I don't personally think his going to court was influenced by Depp

Liam- 20-06-2022 11:02 AM

All I got from that is that you believe he shouldn’t have been allowed to fully share his side of the story, effectively silencing him, which is funnily enough what you Amber stans are claiming is happening to her, it’s sad how much hostility and unfairness men are faced with today simply for being men, do better, he deserved his day in court to give his full version of events and he got it, the law was followed and he won.

If people believe that they have been defamed then they have the legal right to do something about it if they have the resources to do so, that’s the law, the law doesn’t stop working just because a woman is being accused of something, no matter how much you lot want that to be the case, sorry if that makes you sad.

Also, Brad Pitt isn’t suing for defamation, it’s a contract dispute, still Johnny’s fault though right? Cause **** men

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11179039)
i said way back when Britney regained control that we hadn't heard the last from Jamie Spears, so I don't personally think his going to court was influenced by Depp

Some Amber supporters will believe anything. I mean, they believe her.

Shock horror that a man might want to defend himself when accused of allegations. :conf:

Yet, if a woman claims certain allegations we are just meant to believe her because, what, she's a woman?... And women are abused more than men even though a lot of men don't come forward because it would make them less of man....

It's alright having all this feminism... I am on support of women's rights also, but I am equally in support of men's rights too. If women want equality then they should expect to be treated the same as men or have equal opportunities to them.... This doesn't happen in reality. Women's rights are pushed so far down our throats that men are often overlooked

Liam- 20-06-2022 11:05 AM

Quote:

MRA is your favourite subject. If I got a pound everytime you mentioned it I would be rich now.

I actually think if it gives a platform to others who have been abused to speak out then it's a good thing.

It's not the case with Jamie spears
It’s all they have, in their minds anybody that doesn’t automatically believe all women or don’t blindly support women in every instance ever, belongs to some online, woman hating cesspit, it’s laughable and completely demonstrates why the more extreme side of the feminist movement is often laughed at and not taken seriously

user104658 20-06-2022 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11179039)
i said way back when Britney regained control that we hadn't heard the last from Jamie Spears, so I don't personally think his going to court was influenced by Depp

I think you're right that there was no way he was going to let her go but the specifics of him suddenly deciding that a defamation case is the way to do that, and right now, is too much of a coincidence for me personally. Yes I think he's probably been trying to think of ways to return to court - but I think the Depp trial has probably served as kindling for the method. And that's what I'm talking about above, really. It's not that it's going to be prompting random men who were just going about their day into suddenly starting legal proceedings. It's just shone a light on a "possible path" to doing so.

"Hmmmm how can I get this back in court... how can I get this back in court... how can I still win this... hmmmmm"

*Depp vs Heard, Depp wins, everyone collectively cums their Jack Sparrow boxers*

"AHA! Defamation!!"


It sets precedent - not legal precedent as obviously precedent for libel already exists - but precedent in the immediate mindset of the public.

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11179043)
It’s all they have, in their minds anybody that doesn’t automatically believe all women or don’t blindly support women in every instance ever, belongs to some online, woman hating cesspit, it’s laughable and completely demonstrates why the more extreme side of the feminist movement is often laughed at and not taken seriously

Yep, I agree with a lot of what you say and the points you make in numerous cposts

user104658 20-06-2022 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11179041)
All I got from that is that you believe he shouldn’t have been allowed to fully share his side of the story, effectively silencing him, which is funnily enough what you Amber stans are claiming is happening to her, it’s sad how much hostility and unfairness men are faced with today simply for being men, do better, he deserved his day in court to give his full version of events and he got it, the law was followed and he won.

No no he should have every right in the world to talk about it and put his story into the public domain. He just shouldn't have been able to sue over it. As she also had every right to talk about it. It's not rocket science is it?

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11179044)
I think you're right that there was no way he was going to let her go but the specifics of him suddenly deciding that a defamation case is the way to do that, and right now, is too much of a coincidence for me personally. Yes I think he's probably been trying to think of ways to return to court - but I think the Depp trial has probably served as kindling for the method. And that's what I'm talking about above, really. It's not that it's going to be prompting random men who were just going about their day into suddenly starting legal proceedings. It's just shone a light on a "possible path" to doing so.

"Hmmmm how can I get this back in court... how can I get this back in court... how can I still win this... hmmmmm"

*Depp vs Heard, Depp wins, everyone collectively cums their Jack Sparrow boxers*

"AHA! Defamation!!"


It sets precedent - not legal precedent as obviously precedent for libel already exists - but precedent in the immediate mindset of the public.

Didnt even know who jack sparrow was until you have started going on about it.

You love to believe that those who don't believe her are massive jack sparrow/Johnny Depp fans and it's just not true. Some are, of course but it has attracted such a big audience that to suggest it's because he's this world godly loved character is the reason he's getting most of the support is just not true imo

user104658 20-06-2022 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11179043)
It’s all they have, in their minds anybody that doesn’t automatically believe all women or don’t blindly support women in every instance ever, belongs to some online, woman hating cesspit, it’s laughable and completely demonstrates why the more extreme side of the feminist movement is often laughed at and not taken seriously

Not "anybody" Liam, just you. When you start posting MRA stuff like "still Johnny’s fault though right? Cause **** men :bawling: :bawling:"

Although to be fair ThomasC has you well and truly trumped with;

Quote:

If women want equality then they should expect to be treated the same as men or have equal opportunities to them.... This doesn't happen in reality. Women's rights are pushed so far down our throats that men are often overlooked
If you want me to stop talking about MRA's, you'll need to stop spouting this sad, toxic butthurt MRA claptrap. Until then I will continue to call it what it is.

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11179046)
No no he should have every right in the world to talk about it and put his story into the public domain. He just shouldn't have been able to sue over it. As she also had every right to talk about it. It's not rocket science is it?

It's not rocket science either that if you defame someone you can also be sued

user104658 20-06-2022 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThomasC (Post 11179047)
to suggest it's because he's this world godly loved character is the reason he's getting most of the support is just not true imo

Of course it's at the very least partically true, another huge section of his support is the "Finally a spotlight has been shone on life's real victims; men :hee:" MRA crowd but I'm not allowed to talk about that :worry:.

You'll soon see this of course when Jamie Spears gets basically no public support because he isn't the cool sexy option. He'll still get plenty of that Men's Rights support though.

Liam- 20-06-2022 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThomasC (Post 11179050)
It's not rocket science either that if you defame someone you can also be sued

No that’s not how it works! Women are allowed to say whatever they want about men and face no consequences for it, even if they’re lying through their teeth and any attempt at consequences is sexist!

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11179048)
Not "anybody" Liam, just you. When you start posting MRA stuff like "still Johnny’s fault though right? Cause **** men :bawling: :bawling:"

Although to be fair ThomasC has you well and truly trumped with;



If you want me to stop talking about MRA's, you'll need to stop spouting this sad, toxic butthurt MRA claptrap. Until then I will continue to call it what it is.

Bull****. You're the one who has a massive thing about MRA and it being crap. Why are 77% of suicides men? Child custody rights, domestic violence, more higher risk jobs, more likely to be homeless, expected to fight for country, FGM and male corcumsticion, etc etc.

You keep calling it what YOU THINK it is.

If there is to be true equality then both men's and women's right need to be discussed.... Yet whenever someone comes up with something which favoures the man or on support off you scream MRA and try make out it doesn't exist and that it's crap.

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11179052)
Of course it's at the very least partically true, another huge section of his support is the "Finally a spotlight has been shone on life's real victims; men :hee:" MRA crowd but I'm not allowed to talk about that :worry:.

You'll soon see this of course when Jamie Spears gets basically no public support because he isn't the cool sexy option. He'll still get plenty of that Men's Rights support though.

I don't agree with that quote, but what I do agree with and think is right is that it opens the discussion to a very real problem. Men get abused too, not just women. Not allowed to talk about it? You mention it at any opportunity you can Hun.

Well if Jamie spears does sue then it will be down to a judge/jury.

Liam- 20-06-2022 11:38 AM

I love and respect women wholeheartedly, what I don’t love and respect is people who use their gender as a shield from accountability which is precisely what Amber Heard is doing, trying to make the conversation about a bigger issue, when it is purely about her own actions, to me, is a clear example of weaponising her gender, which should be indefensible, but clearly not for the radfems

user104658 20-06-2022 11:39 AM

I've a few reddit forums you guys might be interested in? Maybe a Jordan Peterson TikTok or three?

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:39 AM

As an example, all about women's personal spaces with trans using toilets.

Where's the discussion here on whether men feel comfortable with trans entering male toilets? Where's the media discussion?

There hasn't been one.

Equality has become so one sided and it's actually offensive to then say that men's activism or someone who also wants equality for men as well as women is just crap.

user104658 20-06-2022 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11179079)
I love and respect women wholeheartedly

You do not

Quote:

not for the radfems
Exhibit A. You like women who behave how you want them to behave. You hold those who don't in clear disregard, and sometimes contempt. This is clear in the Trans Rights threads, and it's clear in this one.

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11179080)
I've a few reddit forums you guys might be interested in? Maybe a Jordan Peterson TikTok or three?

Don't even use TikTok. Rarely use Facebook or Twitter and not one to watch love island either.

I'll let you continue to use Reddit as you obviously quite like it

user104658 20-06-2022 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThomasC (Post 11179081)
As an example, all about women's personal spaces with trans using toilets.

Where's the discussion here on whether men feel comfortable with trans entering male toilets? Where's the media discussion?

There hasn't been one.

Equality has become so one sided and it's actually offensive to then say that men's activism or someone who also wants equality for men as well as women is just crap.

A trans man entering a men's toilets is at FAR more risk than any of the men in that toilet.

The situation is not equal. You're pushing an argument that is practical nonsense.

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11179079)
I love and respect women wholeheartedly, what I don’t love and respect is people who use their gender as a shield from accountability which is precisely what Amber Heard is doing, trying to make the conversation about a bigger issue, when it is purely about her own actions, to me, is a clear example of weaponising her gender, which should be indefensible, but clearly not for the radfems

Good job that very few believe her really. Not all common sense is lost :joker:

user104658 20-06-2022 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThomasC (Post 11179083)
Don't even use TikTok. Rarely use Facebook or Twitter and not one to watch love island either.

I'll let you continue to use Reddit as you obviously quite like it

I didn't say you use it, I said you might like me to direct you to some of the Jordan Peterson whining on there because a lot of what you're saying is straight out of his "Waaaaah but men work in sewers and fight wars!" playbook.

Liam- 20-06-2022 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThomasC (Post 11179085)
Good job that very few believe her really. Not all common sense is lost :joker:

The only people who believe her at this point either didn’t watch the trial, or those that did watch the trial and just refuse to believe that a man can be telling the truth about a woman wronging him in the way that she did and will always believe women no matter the evidence, facts or reason, just because, no two ways about it in my eyes

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11179084)
A trans man entering a men's toilets is at FAR more risk than any of the men in that toilet.

The situation is not equal. You're pushing an argument that is practical nonsense.

I'm not pushing it, I just used it as an example, maybe not the best one. ...but you've missed my point on whether other men would feel comfortable with it which forms a basis over the big discussion that women have an issue with in trans using their spaces


Another example would be custodial rights which is way more favoured towards the woman.

ThomasC 20-06-2022 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11179086)
I didn't say you use it, I said you might like me to direct you to some of the Jordan Peterson whining on there because a lot of what you're saying is straight out of his "Waaaaah but men work in sewers and fight wars!" playbook.

Don't even know who Jordan Peterson is :conf:


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.