Originally Posted by InOne (Post 4028759)

See, that is why these papers are bollocks, just have these silly stories and no actual facts!!!

Originally Posted by arista (Post 4028147)

http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content...4/15875704.jpg

So CJ loves Death
scared the kids.

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4028776)

Thanks! :hug: to you too.

My real name is Pyramid* :hugesmile: !! Seeing as I'm older than the sands of time..... and certainly from what I see... a lot older than the majority on tibbs! Call me granny and the police will be looking for another homicidal maniac !!

Originally Posted by angus58 (Post 4028787)

This sort of smear campaign is outrageous and really should not be allowed - it's like a trial by newspaper. Whether he's guilty or not he's entitled to a fair and unbiased trial - what does it matter whether he's an eccentric, has blue hair, or is considered weird by some rather sheltered souls? When exactly was any of that a crime?

Personally, I still suspect he might be involved because of the circumstances, not because of how he looks or behaves, but until the police find some hard evidence he deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Originally Posted by InOne (Post 4028788)

Stop being so dramatic :tongue:

Originally Posted by mrscolumbo (Post 4028857)

Well I expect with little or no leads the police had to be seen to be doing something - Mr Jefferies a little too convenient as a suspect I fear - like saying the butler did it!

Originally Posted by angus58 (Post 4028787)

This sort of smear campaign is outrageous and really should not be allowed - it's like a trial by newspaper. Whether he's guilty or not he's entitled to a fair and unbiased trial - what does it matter whether he's an eccentric, has blue hair, or is considered weird by some rather sheltered souls? When exactly was any of that a crime?

Personally, I still suspect he might be involved because of the circumstances, not because of how he looks or behaves, but until the police find some hard evidence he deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Originally Posted by JobsForTheBoys (Post 4028846)

If he is released without charge will the newspapers still keep up with their character assasination of him or will they apologise to him?

Originally Posted by Novo (Post 4028922)

Obsessed with Death
Scared the Kids at the School
Peeping tom
eccentric meddler
Stalker
nutty professor


What is next to add to the list?

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4028920)

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...ays-woman.html

Have just read this.

What a load of baloney.

Let's start with the facts that put a whole different light on this woman's story.

She had been living in a refuge having left an abusive relationship - ie: she would have been in a very sensitive place emotionally and psychologically herself and would naturally be on the 'alert' - on the defensive due her own personal circumstances in having left an abusive relationship.

A man she clearly didn't like, began to pay her some attention. Hardly a crime. he and she happened to go to the same library, the same coffee shop, walk past the same bus stops: hardly unusual for 2 people in the same town to share the same haunts.

The paper reports that she 'confronted' him to say that she felt his behaviour wasn't normal and he replied with anger, "what do you think I am, some sort of pervert?". I'd say that any ordinary person, with very ordinary and normal intentions WOULD react like in that manner - if they were 'confronted' - especially if their intentions were innocent.

This man that she barely knew, she manages to pigeon hole as domineering, as a control freak and dominant towards women. How would she know this if she herself had not spent some time with him to determine this? Oh wait... she didn't ! On giving her 'story' her, it's claimed that she was weeping - what a load of utter piffle.

Another snippet in this story about former tenants who claimed he was a peeping tom type.



Which proves one thing about this couple: they were wrong.

Absolutely shocking that this type of reporting is allowed to continue, it really is. If he's found guilty, let this stuff come out: but it's completely inappropriate at this crucial stage.

Originally Posted by Novo (Post 4028929)

"I'm a natural blonde and he'd comment on how nice my hair was - he did like blondes. "


Numerous other articles have said that he has never shown interest towards Women or Men

Sounds like someone trying to sneak in their 5 minutes of fame

Originally Posted by Novo (Post 4028931)

Yesterday, as forensics officers continued to comb the Victorian building where Jefferies lives, a couple told how they nicknamed him "Hannibal Lecter" while living in one of his basement flats

^

Add Hannibal Lector to that list

Originally Posted by Zippy (Post 4029405)

I reckon he's guilty as hell. Sorry, I just do.

The police reckon she was abducted from the house without any break in(so it was somebody she knew probably) then taken 3 miles away and dumped. I reckon he strangled her in an arguement and then knew it would be best to make it look like it happened away from the house. Makes him less of a suspect.

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4029421)

Why are you sorry !!! You've got every right to think that if it's what you believe, I'm pretty sure you aren't alone either, there will be a lot who will think the same way.

Time will tell. In it's own very warped way, gruesome as it sounds, I do find a certain interest / slight fascination in these type of things - purely from the psychological interest / p.o.v. if he is charged and found to be guilty etc.