the truth |
19-03-2014 03:20 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by sassysocks
(Post 6761796)
So you would force women to have babies they may not want, for whatever reason, but you would take them away from them if they want custody. You don't want things all your way then - no control issues there.
|
no I never ever said that so your eust making it up, disgraceful
instead we have a system which offers very little often no support to mothers and fathers to be who are confused as to whether to proceed and have the baby. often rushed and given little options or advice they rush into abortion and kill healthy babies sometimes aged up to 22 weeks.....the parents often spend the rest of their lives regretting it and often complain they felt pressurised and rushed into making such a monumental decision. and were offered little or no alternatives nor advice. do the radical feminists even realise 51% of these are female babies who are given no rights to anything , not even life itself.
it seems the dumbo radicals in the femininazi war seem to think the only alternative to the idiots who banned all abortion is to have mass abortion of this gigantic scale....erm ever heard of common sense compromise, collaboration middle ground?
if only the radical feminists could see past their male hate and understand there is a better way than this and this is why were top of the european abortion league with 1 million babies killed every 6 years. most of which are healthy and NOT the result of abortion. still better to let a million good babies die than swallow our pride and converse with the enemy those evil men eh?
kill the babies and win the argument, good choice?
|