sorry....who said she hasnt? :shrug:

Did I say anyone had?... The fact is she has, and she is as free as anyone to excersise those rights.
Privacy is an important issue imo, fair play she should seek to maintain it.

Like I said before...No one has said otherwise..:laugh:

Let’s hope no one randomly takes photos of your kids without consent when you are out and about then. According to you there is no reason to be upset about that.




Never mind someone doing it on your own property.

Very Large Sunday Times

He supported William and Kate and expected the same in return. Shameful.

William has always seemed like a snotty prat, just like his dad.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...han-Harry.html

'We rolled out the red carpet for Meghan': Frustrated Kate Middleton and Prince William hit back at claims in devastating biography that Duchess and Harry felt shunned by the Royal Family and insist they welcomed her with open arms

Versed.

No article by a named royal correspondent this time - especially for you.
You're welcome!

A tabloid article... citing unnamed "sources". The same ones you cast aside when it doesn't fit your narrative?

Nope. The article isn't doing what you think it is doing.

Could you clarify what you are trying to say? :conf:

Tabloid. Gossip. Is. Not. Factual.

Books. Written. Based. On. Hearsay. Are. Just. That.

What are you on about?
I posted a DM item that wasn't written by a respected royal correspondent like those I usually post.
I said it was especially for you.
Your responses are making no sense.

Anyway....Back to Harry and Meghan...

https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/...n-markle-book/

The pre - orders have been disappointing....

I imagine they are. Nobody wants a book version of what was all over the news already months ago.

...I was watching the Princess Diana V the Media programme last night...and a Royal corespondent themselves said that, that title means they’ll always go with the most commercially profitable slant/story and other than that it doesn’t give any special insight over any other media...which makes complete sense obviously...

It's probably a "column a, column b" thing.

The royals were probably welcoming, and just expected Meghan to slot into the princess shaped slot and behave herself. But that's not who Meghan is, she's Hollywood and not aristocracy. So when she was showing glimmers of individuality, she got the frosty reception.

i can see them getting divorced soon and that being blamed on the public too

I don’t follow the Royals very much but early on they were interviewed together and dubbed the fab 4, they set up a charity together, Megs attended Wimbledon with Kate, there wasn’t any tense body language between the couples at all, fast forward to that final service they attended and it was clear there was tension, so I would say if there were tensions in the early days they were well hidden

You see Cherie for me..
I think the Royal life must be really weird.

To any outsider going into it, to have their natural personalities made more robotic.
I doubt anything before really becoming entrenched into the set up, in the ' firm ' as it was termed, that you could ever be prepared for the reality.

I think it's hard enough for those born into it.
I mean, Princess Margaret was quite rebellious as the Queen's Sister.
Princess Anne made many gaffes too although I really think she found the balance of being her own person while dutifully performing as a Royal too.

Diana and Sarah Ferguson threatened the ' Royal protocol set up ',they found themselves just about hounded out.

It must be really difficult pretending to like or get along with people you cannot.

So for me, while I think the Royal set up needs dragging into the 21st century, while I remain a Royalist certainly.

I can understand pressures, particularly on any outsider joining becoming just too intense.

It's why I choose not to.judge them too harshly.

As to these 2, well married couples make their beds and have to lie in them.
So again all I do is wish them well.
I totally support them both, protecting and looking out for their child against media or any unnecessary intrusion to their, as private as it can get, life.

Equally to the Cambridge's too.
They represent the dutiful side of the Royals..
However it doesn't have to be that Brothers and their wives have to get along.

Across the Country, there will be families with daughters in law not getting on with each other, uneasy truces between Brothers and the rest of the family.
Even Mother's and Father's not getting on with their in laws family.

The fact things gets so stifled in Royalty only likely adds to the pressure in my view

Of course they can choose to step back but I'd hate to live the Royal life.

Agree with all of that Joey

I can't stand the royal family. Meghan and Harry can do what they want as far as i'm concerned, providing i'm not paying for it. Those of them who are claiming a salary, I expect them to carry out the duties they are paid for, nothing more, nothing less