Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11012996)

She talking about something that happened to someone else ..she has no proof of it ever being said.

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11012996)

She talking about something that happened to someone else ..she has no proof of it ever being said.

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11012990)

You could say the same of Meghan detractors though. :shrug: she's lying and playing the victim whatever she says is the general consensus.

This interview was never going to change anyone's opinion of them. I'm bored of it already :laugh:

Its quite telling though if the story is true about the Kate / Meghan incident. I assume if Kate sent a note, that could be produced to prove it but for the Royals to have allowed the press to run with that story since the wedding without refuting it is pretty horrible. They could have issued a statement saying there was no truth to that rumour (without throwing Kate under the bus).

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11013002)

‘From the Mailonline lead article’

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11013005)

MailOnline is one of the world's largest English speaking newspaper websites with more than 252m global unique browsers. A trailblazing global phenomenon, MailOnline has 24.9m monthly unique visitors.


:thumbs:

only the best data for Tibb

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11013005)

MailOnline is one of the world's largest English speaking newspaper websites with more than 252m global unique browsers. A trailblazing global phenomenon, MailOnline has 24.9m monthly unique visitors.


:thumbs:

only the best data for Tibb

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11013000)

What a lovely thing to do - air family disagreements on international television.

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 11013009)

Bat out of Hell 2 sold 14 million copies, that does not make it a good album

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11013011)

I has been around for years that Meghan made Kate cry at a fitting for the bridesmaid dresses. That has never been refuted by Meghan or Harry in all this time and now, all of a sudden, its the other way round?
Saving it for the big Oprah interview, eh?
Not buying it.

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11013008)

Families take offence at each other all the time, someone says something, someone else takes it the wrong way, we didn't have 20 years of JK because families got along, the Royals are no different :laugh:

The narrative when they left was that it was due to the Toxic Media, even up to Harry on the bus...da media

somewhere along the line the narrative changed

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11013008)

Families take offence at each other all the time, someone says something, someone else takes it the wrong way, we didn't have 20 years of JK because families got along, the Royals are no different :laugh:

The narrative when they left was that it was due to the Toxic Media, even up to Harry on the bus...da media

somewhere along the line the narrative changed

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11013018)

Well it wouldn't have been a good look if he owned up to it all being about money.

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11013016)

so who was at the first wedding?

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11013022)

Just the two of them and the Archbishop I think (didn't mention witnesses so obviously wasnt a legal wedding)

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 11012894)

For two people supposedly suffer from mental health so bad they considered suicide they look like they have made a full recovery, I don’t believe a word they say.

A mile away from my house a 24 year old man hung himself in someone’s horse paddock last week.

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11013021)

Royal Family are toxic but do call us the Duke and Duchess :laugh: