![]() |
to be honest its like hearing one side of an arguiment from a collegue at work
you sit there saying "omg" "really?" "blimey, what did you say then?" but in the back of your mind you are thinking "aye right and if i spoke to the other person maybe id get a completely different story..." Airing your dirty laundry in public is demeaning and always makes things worse in the end |
tonight will be broadcast on all our dutch channels
|
Quote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...d-1299804.html I did think they might have wished Phillip well. |
11.3m watched this last night. Wonder how many of them claimed they wouldn’t be?
|
Quote:
:hee: |
..so many memes etc today as we can imagine...just a few of the more gentle ones with Diana, I’ll post...
https://static.boredpanda.com/blog/w...1-png__700.jpg https://static.boredpanda.com/blog/w...9-png__700.jpg |
Quote:
Literally we are all prisoners, Meg can relate and only 11m tuned in lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This was a long planned vehicle for them to tell their story. It wasn't a debate. She did push, she pushed to get to the root of the lack of support for their mental health issues She pushed to find out who made the racist comment.. To both Meghan and Prince Harry. Prince Harry himself who it was said to, refused to identify as did Meghan. If you were doing an interview, where you were presenting your side of an issue . Would you expect to be challenged by the person you'd agreed to tell it to. As for Prince Philip,Prince Harry indicated with James Corden, he still talked with him. When was this recorded, would they even have known Prince Philip was still in hospital. It wasn't a live interview. However, my point, if I'd agreed to tell my story of why I'd taken some move in my life and what were the things that shaped that move.. I wouldn't expect in that chat, to have challenges to it from someone who themselves had no real.knowkedge of the internal set up. Which both Prince Harry and Meghan certainly have. I've had the opposite to you, I've had people wishing they'd talked more and Oprah less. |
11 million is HUGE for a 9pm showing on a weeknight
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:whistle: |
I mean, yes it's one side of the story and everything they say could be truth or half truths or lies, we could sit here and argue all day about it however for me the proof of how shabbily Meghan was treated by the press is all there in black and white (pardon the pun) Did anyone ever come out and defend her when she's getting bullied to **** by the papers? That alone tells me her story holds some water :shrug:
|
Quote:
The most watched thing over Christmas was the Queen's broadcast, with less than that. Only around 8 million + I know of a lot of people who have recorded it to watch today or later in the week. I'm sure there's people who say they didn't or wouldn't watch it, that actually did. I myself wasn't sure I was going to a week or so ago, however I decided I would because I wanted to hear the whole content and context all was said. So I could comment with the fullest knowledge relating to it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and I doubt anyone in the Royal Household would have said "here, Megs did you see what they said in the SUn today about you?" The press thing is a scapegoat They get far, far worse on Twitter which is unregulated Im sure i get dragged very occasionally (and i mean very occasionally what with me being down with the kidz) on that discord thing but i never see it nor know how to look at it so i remain unbothered |
... Crikey, the makers of The Crown must be checking their bank accounts by the moment and already planning season #2647589....I should watch it some time...
|
Quote:
It was also the programme they agreed to in order to present their side of their decision and why they made it. It is clear on the vile headlines of the press and the comparisons of her with Kate. That their claims against the press are justified. As a court has just so ruled. Only they know the full Royal set up of the institution they highlighted and how bad it became for them. Of course the Palace won't accept that account, it's all shrouded in mystery. I was only 5 when Princess Diana died, however it seems to me, the same dark, sinister and cold institution it was when she was in the Royal machinery. Hasn't altered at all. Nothing changed, nothing learned or dealt with. So I too can support the view they were genuine in this interview. I see no reason for them not to be. After all they walked off once it reached for them a more dangerous level. Plus it was a fully born and bred Royal too who forcefully was presenting and confirming what Meghan had indicated. Namely Prince Harry himself. He lived through the trauma of his Mother's death as a child, he must feel traumatised that he was then witnessing his chosen wife, heading into danger as his Mother did. It's staggering to think the Palace wouldn't have made sure that could never have been the case. |
Quote:
It's actually pretty good and I wouldn't be one for following the Royals by a long way |
Quote:
...just touching on his mother’s death and his all time strained relationship with media, which is going off topic but your post made me think of it for some reason, Joey...I recall his words in an interview and felt his emotional pain so deeply when he spoke about photographers taking photographs of His mother while she was dying in the car...we just can’t imagine, can we..no matter what ‘privilege’ someone is perceived to have... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.