Also, Biden and Harris worked with dems and republicans to create one of the strongest bipartisan border bills in American history, which the dems conceded a lot to appease some of the more extreme parts of the Republicans and then the old felon demanded the republicans voted it down so he had someone to still run on for the election, they don’t give a toss about the border any more than they care about the thousands of kids slaughters in schools with weapons of war

Forgot about that. Very true. :clap1:

The bill was a brilliant bill for both sides and went a long way to stabilising the situation but it also meant Trump had less to complain about. Yep, no one can stop him from the GOP. I'm quite scared.

So if Trump wants to talk about what people have done for America gutting a perfectly good border bill is on his list.

As Liam has pointed out this is a rather silly point for any one to make. Once again LT, when you give us your opinions it doesn't end well for you. You were doing well for a while too.

Yes get her in a Live CNN HD
debate with Trump.


And an Audience

:clap1:

Elizabeth Warren confirms that Kamala Harris will grant citizenship TO ALL THE
million OF illegals she let in as Border Czar:

“She will work with Congress to get that done.”

Kamala is a Marxist who wants all of America to follow California’s disastrous
path.


CHILLING VIDEO HERE: https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1817582179691716891

I’m shocked LT lets Trump get away with being a rapist and felon but calls Harris a terrible candidate. It makes no sense

MSM Gaslighting - dont sip the KOOL AID
 

He’s the most disingenuous member on here

I see he ignores the truth to go into his false stories too

Interesting but silly video.

Look a few posts above and you will see that Trump help gut a good bill that would have been positive for the border.

Is the MSM lying? Probably, does it matter when Trump blocks perfectly good bills? :shrug:

There's gaslighting and then there's what you're doing.

Yep.

Glad to see other people finally clocking it

I think we should play a game, when the news is slow or just not interesting enough, where we find some way to connect the current thread or article to Meghan Markle.

In all seriousness, she's a social media expert. That just means she's into social engineering and has designed her image to act like a mind virus. So it really shouldn't be difficult to find some way to twist anything mundane into a for/against situation and connect her with even seemingly "out there" narratives. Other social media-styled celebrity personalities are designed the same and their images are hyper-fixated and fine-tuned to get get the max amount of people to argue/post about them either favorably or unfavorably. The more divided, the better, so it's all a trap to get people angry about about them (favorably or not) and posting regularly. Even the people who "slate" them online, they're fully in on the grift. It's not an accident her name got drug up here again. One can easily blame racism or whatever, but it's far more sinister than that. The racial eliminate is just a way to manipulate the audiences into clashing. Though I agree there's "similarities", if we are only were looking at their crafted image and their participation in the same craftiness behind said images (Kamala particularly, but she's a politician by trade)... Anyway, it's intentional that both are as opaque as possible so as to not reveal what we can't see behind the mask. Instead, we see a veneer designed to be as superficial as feasible, and that superficiality is tweaked to get as many people pissed off as possible... and makes it easier to gaslight others when they just want to talk policy. "You just have a bias because XYZ!". Consider if this if your own reaction to discussions around certain figures whether It's 100% intended that this will be a never ending culture war. No resolution, just argue about pretty faces and keep the media busy writing endless tabloid fodder about all of them... and thus people will vote for them for the symbolic purpose of fueling a lust for goading the other side edit: whether with views, impressions, cash, actual votes, etc...

It makes nothing but sense; LT's threads have been oozing misogyny since [a certain time when a certain thing changed but mods don't like us to talk about that and suddenly become very active].

This guy was also one time seen as a rapist and a felon. Whilst Jimmy Saville was living a life of luxury and seen has a great man.

There's a lesson there somewhere for you.

Donald Trump owns any problems at the border

Doesn’t mean trump is innocent. What’s your point?

I say he is innocent. That's my point.

I was taught the story of the boy who cried wolf. And they've cried wolf that many times against Trump that I don't believe them.

Nah I reckon pretty much everything said about Trump has been true, just without enough evidence to stick. In my opinion, of course.

woke AI lies about history

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTmZKS5X...jpg&name=small

The AI models only cover the time period up to the point they were created. If you ask it, what is the weather today in your location, its not able to give a response. Your example is no different to that

…yeah I totally understand what you’re saying…I’m not familiar enough with Kamala Harris to have seen those personality traits if they can be attributed but they are quite widely applied to many, I would say…and they are specifically things that we would attach to personality traits only, not to any heritage …so hmmmmm, why then those two being compared specifically….

Different people are named for each likeness. What ONE individual with all of those traits could replace Meghan in the article? I personally can’t think of any.
Apart from that:
Kamala is running for President, Meghan has apparently expressed a desire to one day run for President (haha), or at least become seriously involved in US politics.
They have expressed support for each other more than once in the past.

But no, the one and only link is their skin colour. Really? Why does the mind zoom in on race?