ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB17 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=696)
-   -   Andrew I very much doubt Andrew is a racist (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=302149)

MB. 11-06-2016 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8708983)
Why would I "give up" posting in a popular thread that I started, about an issue with a programme that I am interested in?:shrug:

Like I said, I waste time on forums but I draw the line at starting threads then abandoning them because someone has disagreed with me.

Mate this thread stopped being about Andrew nine pages ago

Denver 11-06-2016 12:12 AM

ThriceShy for ML2K16?

ThriceShy 11-06-2016 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 8709032)
If you're trying to keep the thread tidy, why do you call other members 'ignorant' and 'bigots' but then tell others to stick to discussing the housemates? Seems a bit hypocritical, no?

In actuality I never slate you first, I answer your questions, present you with facts and then you choose to ignore them and when you're pulled up for it, resort to telling me to 'stick to talking about the housemates'. This process usually goes on for pages and pages...so really it's you that's making your own threads untidy.

And I would love you to put me on ignore! Please do. It would probably be better for you too, because then you'd have a reason not to respond to my posts which disprove your arguments :hehe:

Begging to be put on ignore is not a good look.

I haven't called anyone here a bigot. People here suggested that Andrew, and in some cases myself, were bigots. I simply responded that Andrew's detractors were behaving more like bigots.

The revealing thing is that you have never objected at the bigot tag being bandied my way but you then get all uppity when I simply point out what a bigot really is.

Heaven = Winner 11-06-2016 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 8708980)
Does that include people from the Midlands?:hee:

http://i.giphy.com/l41m5DGp41aARKLIY.gif

LukeB 11-06-2016 12:16 AM

http://67.media.tumblr.com/776585082...hyP1racrjh.gif

Mystic Mock 11-06-2016 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilbro (Post 8709034)

Oh he wishes.

Mystic Mock 11-06-2016 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heaven = Winner (Post 8709074)

Be careful about those Black Country lot, they'll be asking "yam alrite yam ya?" And you'll be just as confused as I was when I first heard them say it.

And don't even get me started on how Brummies say toothbrush.:bawling::joker:

Marsh. 11-06-2016 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 8709014)
You spoke to someone from Birmingham?

Not LukeB getting involved.

LukeB 11-06-2016 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 8709014)
You spoke to someone from Birmingham?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8709106)
Not LukeB getting involved.

http://pa1.narvii.com/5775/eaa2dd34a...309d540_hq.gif

Jack_ 11-06-2016 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709070)
Begging to be put on ignore is not a good look.

Nor is claiming you always win online debates and then losing every one you're ever involved in.

And neither is being a hypocrite.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709070)
I haven't called anyone here a bigot

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8705995)
Please don't make me post the definition of bigot again.

He has said nothing bigoted. The bigots are the people who don't want him to express his opinion.

You can't be racist toward your own race. Simple as that. He is just a bit of a WUM on twitter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8706130)
You really seem confused about the word bigot. A bigot is not someone who discriminates. It is someone who thinks that their opinion is the only one that matters. That tag applies more to andrew's detractors than it does to andrew.

It just looks ignorant to keep using the wrong word.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8706162)
Nowhere has the future BB winner andrew said that other people's opinions don't matter. It is his detractors who have clearly stated on here that he should be ejected for his opinion. So it is they who are the bigots, not Andrew.

Sorry, you were saying?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709070)
The revealing thing is that you have never objected at the bigot tag being bandied my way but you then get all uppity when I simply point out what a bigot really is.

Actually that's not true either. I get all 'uppity' at you telling others not to discuss forum members and to stick to the housemates, all while you're calling said forum members 'bigots' and 'ignorant'. Much like the Danny issue, it's the hypocrisy I have a problem with :hehe:

Mystic Mock 11-06-2016 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8709106)
Not LukeB getting involved.

Have you got Toughache Marsh?

Marsh. 11-06-2016 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 8709119)
Have you got Toughache Marsh?

:joker:

Ant. 11-06-2016 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 8709116)
Nor is claiming you always win online debates and then losing every one you're ever involved in.

And neither is being a hypocrite.









Sorry, you were saying?



Actually that's not true either. I get all 'uppity' at you telling others not to discuss forum members and to stick to the housemates, all while you're calling said forum members 'bigots' and 'ignorant'. Much like the Danny issue, it's the hypocrisy I have a problem with :hehe:

Clock'd
ThriceShy you lost 5 pages back but this solidifies the fact you've lost
buh bye

Amy Jade 11-06-2016 12:28 AM

That Andrew's a right prick isn't he

MrWong 11-06-2016 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 8709116)
Nor is claiming you always win online debates and then losing every one you're ever involved in.

And neither is being a hypocrite.









Sorry, you were saying?



Actually that's not true either. I get all 'uppity' at you telling others not to discuss forum members and to stick to the housemates, all while you're calling said forum members 'bigots' and 'ignorant'. Much like the Danny issue, it's the hypocrisy I have a problem with :hehe:


http://mlbfancave.mlb.com/assets/ima...1_349fsfx7.gif

Mystic Mock 11-06-2016 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 8709143)
That Andrew's a right prick isn't he

Is he the prick in the wall?

Amy Jade 11-06-2016 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 8709149)
Is he the prick in the wall?

A prick in general I believe.

ThriceShy 11-06-2016 12:33 AM

So jack admits he has a problem with me. We got there in the end. I will pop him on ignore for both our sakes.

He quotes me saying that it is ignorant to use the wrong word but completely ignores the fact that the person I was responding to had repeatedly called me "dense."

The hypocrisy is Jack's.

Amy Jade 11-06-2016 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709168)
So jack admits he has a problem with me. We got there in the end. I will pop him on ignore for both our sakes.

You mean so you can avoid getting dragged by him.

Mystic Mock 11-06-2016 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 8709166)
A prick in general I believe.

:joker:

Teacher! Leave those black kids alone.:hehe:

In poor taste, but the thread is about Andrew tbf.:joker:

Jack_ 11-06-2016 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 8709179)
You mean so you can avoid getting dragged by him.

Pretty much

Oh well, all in a day's work everyone :hehe:

Amy Jade 11-06-2016 12:39 AM

Not Jack ignoring facts! Reminds me of someone that does http://r14.imgfast.net/users/1413/43...iles/32777.gif

Withano 11-06-2016 01:06 AM

annihilated worse than Back To Black after Beyonce and Andre 3000 covered it

ThriceShy 11-06-2016 01:14 AM

I can see a serious meltdown coming on here when andrew wins.

Marsh. 11-06-2016 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709305)
I can see a serious meltdown coming on here when andrew wins.

Helen Wood already set a precedent for horrid bigots winning anyway?

ThriceShy 11-06-2016 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8709307)
Helen Wood already set a precedent for horrid bigots winning anyway?

Helen was a bully not a bigot. People really do have a problem with that word:joker:

Andrew would be one of the greatest winners ever. I believe he can do it.

Ant. 11-06-2016 01:18 AM

so did thriceshy win this debate like he does with most debates or

Marsh. 11-06-2016 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709317)
Helen was a bully not a bigot.

It is possible to be both. :pat:

Ant. 11-06-2016 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709317)
Helen was a bully not a bigot. People really do have a problem with that word:joker:

Andrew would be one of the greatest winners ever. I believe he can do it.

uhm yknow bully and bigot arent mutually exclusive.. Helen can be a bully and a bigot...

u also believe he's not a bigot even though she is?

ThriceShy 11-06-2016 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8709321)
It is possible to be both. :pat:

It is but she wasn't both. She was just an out and out aggressive nasty bully. Bigot has a precise definition that doesn't apply to her or andrew.

Marsh. 11-06-2016 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709329)
It is but she wasn't both. She was just an out and out aggressive nasty bully. Bigot has a precise definition that doesn't apply to her or andrew.

In what way does it not apply to Helen? :joker: She was completely intolerant of others.

Ant. 11-06-2016 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709329)
It is but she wasn't both. She was just an out and out aggressive nasty bully. Bigot has a precise definition that doesn't apply to her or andrew.

But it applies to us? :umm2:

ThriceShy 11-06-2016 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8709333)
In what way does it not apply to Helen? :joker: She was completely intolerant of others.

Not really in terms of opinions though. She just has some sort of anti social personality disorder in my opinion. To call her a bigot is as pointless as calling Hitler an adulterer. It ain't his main drawback.

Marsh. 11-06-2016 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709339)
Not really in terms of opinions though. She just has some sort of anti social personality disorder in my opinion. To call her a bigot is as pointless as calling Hitler an adulterer. It ain't his main drawback.

Who said it was her "main" drawback? That's another discussion entirely.

The point was we already have a precedent for a bigot winning therefore if Andrew won it wouldn't make him not a bigot.

Very simple.

MB. 11-06-2016 01:29 AM

Go to bed the lot of you

Marsh. 11-06-2016 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MB. (Post 8709344)
Go to bed the lot of you

FIVE more minutes. :(

ThriceShy 11-06-2016 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8709342)
Who said it was her "main" drawback? That's another discussion entirely.

The point was we already have a precedent for a bigot winning therefore if Andrew won it wouldn't make him not a bigot.

Very simple.

But I don't think she was a bigot.

But you do have a point, if somebody like Helen can win then I don't see why andrew can't. Although it won't be as easy for him to get the chav vote,

Marsh. 11-06-2016 01:30 AM

But ThriceShy wins that one for mentioning Hitler. It only took 13 pages. :clap1:

wendywillow 11-06-2016 01:31 AM

4th day and we already have a 13 page "racism" thread.

Marsh. 11-06-2016 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8709347)
But I don't think she was a bigot.

You also don't think racist remarks are racist so we've come full circle. :smug:


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.