I hope she doesn't profit from this. That would be a ****ing disgrace.

Don't know if it's already posted but theres another

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ist-abuse.html

'tawk ma langwej'

stupid ****

I hope you are aware she was not Charged
kept at the police staion to keep her safe

The reports I had heard were that magistrates referred her to prison "for her own safety"

Using that excuse you could lock someone up indefinitely without trial

It's not often I actually have the urge to punch someone hard in the gob....but I find myself wanting to do it with this piece of trash.

I've never seen or heard someone been so racist in all my life.:devil:

Maybe they need a Mental Hospital

This woman is a disgrace, as everyone has said. However... not so long ago there was a thread on here about the idiot who made fake facebook accounts in order to taunt most cruelly the family of a dead teenager. There were more than a few posts on here claiming that he was treated harshly and suggesting that he was allowed to say pretty much what he wanted because we supposedly have "free speech" in this country. Have those posters changed their minds now?

you need to get out more

Stupid ****ing bitch.

Honestly the ignorance and rudeness of some people in this country astounds me. Does she have no shame? I hope she looks back at that and not only feels extremely embarrassed for her actions, but also sees what a vulgar person she truly is.

Excellent memory recall Livia.

Yes, I'd be interested to know if those same posters still have the same opinions that they were vehemently defending in that other thread.

In fact, i recall the names of some of them..... and I believe some may have posted on this very thread!

Name the posters


Is it Sticks?

Stick has made a good point, this kind of situation always gets used to take away yet more civil liberties that our grandparents fought two wars to protect in my opinion

I don't think that would be entirely fair. They know who they are themselves and if they wish to make themselves known & offer comment, that's their own decision.

I'm interested in how you come to this opinion and what exactly you mean by it?.

Sticks said that the woman had been detained 'for her own good'. In other words, she is being detained because people don't like her, not because she's been proven guilty of a crime.

That's called rule of the mob unless I'm very much mistaken.

Of Course Its Fair
They posted it

Show me a Example ?

this

Really...so the police arrest people just for the sheer hell of 'mob rule ?

There was me thinking that that was only part of the reason - given that she has in fact, actually committed a crime.
Nope....... that's for those concerned Arista to show their feelings on both sides of the coin.

well Sticks says the magistrate remanded her 'for her own safety' which is obviously not the same as a 'racial harassment charge'

Ah right. So as long as Sticks says something: to hell with the actual FACTS as laid down by the Laws of this land and those in charge of upholding such Laws.....

Maybe next time you might want to check up on the full state of play.



:joker:

actually you might want to check up first, as later in the article it says this:

:joker:

See the crucial part of reading posts Fruitcake: is to absorb what is written, rather than be very selective in what you wish to read. So if anyone wants to be checking things first, it is you, not I.

It makes life so much simpler - don't you think.

Actually, I believe you'll find Sticks was referring to the reason she was put in prison. NOT the reason she was arrested.

Get Off the Fence

Name Them

Or do not bother talking about them