Exactly. There is a MASSIVE difference between what Ashleigh said sat at a table in a mood and what Helen said during an aggressive rant. ANY judge on the planet would be able to see the clear difference between the 2 incidents.
Maybe Ashleigh and Chris should have got a warning for saying F you to each other too :rolleyes:

Get her out now, c'mon!

An aggressive rant? Whispering to Ash in the bathroom. :umm2: I thought she was going to kick a dog tbh. :idc:

They have a duty to make sure everyone taking part in a programme are safe

I'm not a fan of either of them but Helen really should have been ejected by now with a dirty great boot up her poop shoot !

:laugh: No they don't. That's the producers. That's not what Ofcom are there for.

They are there to ensure broadcasting rules are abided by.

Did you know she gives to animal charities?

LOL... poop shoot.

BB made the call and gave Helen a warning. They made another call and didn't give Ashleigh a warning. There will be reasons... I'm down with Helen being dragged in and reprimanded, her behaviour has been aggressive and abrasive from day one. Although I would be happier with what Hijaxers suggests.

Oh no, Ashleigh is visiting again
http://www.jacquipatersons.co.uk/wp-...11/10/Fear.jpg

Hmm, I did think hard before I made the response to your post but I see nowhere where you acknowledge the people who did say Helen was wrong,myself being one of them.

I am really glad to hear you forcefully now condemn Ashleigh too for her aggressive behaviour.

Hands up that I was not correct as to you generalising generally,however your start to your post states 'posts on here',it does not say 'some' posts on here.

However,while things are not obviously all about me as you say,when I say something it is only my view I am expressing,
You said, you thought my posts were fair, as I also believe others were too but that expression is nowhere in your post with the fullest and total respect.

This is by far the worst BB for you and I,I accept that as I hate one person constantly attacked all the time while another who has been far from perfect is presented as someone to look up to instead.

I look up to neither of them and find both offensive at times,one I find more entertaining than the other and one I dislike for a characteristic I really reject as to people.

My apologies for upsetting you, I do try to be fair,even when it is hard to be, I have seen others do so too.
To point out the negatives as to posting one way or the other is all fine but acknowledgement that not all do so, goes a long way too.

I think the best thing for you and I to do on this is to avoid responding to each other as to these 2 housemates as we will never agree.
Anyway, thank you for taking the time to respond in the way you did above, it sounds different broken down that way I admit.
I appreciate your enlightenment as to that.

All my best to you anyway.

It should be same rules for all the housemates and Ashleigh should also have received a warning for saying basically the same thing to Christopher. Just cos Helen said it to precious princess Ashleigh she is hauled to the dining room. By the way NONE of them should have said it so I am not condoning Helens actions but fair if fecking fair Big Brother. You cant pick and chose which housemates to warn when two of them have used aggressive words !!!!

Do we know for sure that Ashleigh wasn't also warned? No we don't.

Well surely IF she has,it should have been shown aswell in all fairness.

I find it strange that she got a warning for this comment but didn't get a warning for her comment about Danielle sh****** Jesus. (as far as i'm aware, she didn't get reprimanded for that comment at all) which was a lot worse than what she said in the heat of the moment about Ashleigh

To be honest, I don't care whether they warn Helen a hundred times or just let her fly. Come finals night when she's booed back to the Stone Age, that'll do nicely for me.

Warnings are like chocolate teapots, they're useless.

This one might stop them
http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Page...ic-chair-1.jpg:hehe:

Even by some strange set of events if an Ashleigh warning didn't make it on to the HL show, there is still twitter where the Helen warning was posted, yet no sign of a corresponding Ashleigh post.

So the evidence is mounting that Ashleigh didn't get a warning

Did you and the other people commenting actually see BOTH incidents or are you going on quotes?
Here is the difference. Ashleigh was sat at a table in a mood after having a brief tiff with Christopher. She said she felt like bashing his head on mirror. As in, she felt frustrated with him. She did not want to go into the bedroom and bash Christopher's brains in. It's like when you are trying to explain something to someone and they don't understand you can feel like you want to grab the head and knock sense into them so they understand.
With Helen is was completely different. She was pacing the bedroom and ranting about what she thought she heard Ashleigh and Chris saying. She was angry and said she felt like going in there and kicking her head in. If she wasn't on national TV there is the chance she WOULD have. The chance is very real because we know what kind of character Helen is. She is violent, aggressive and a bully. If people seriously think Ashleigh wanted to literally bang Christopher's head in the same way Helen wanted to then you are completely delusional and would make AWFUL judges in a court.

:hehe: Now that will teach them a lesson

Maybe the fact that Helen's been warned a gazillion times before prompted them to post it. I don't call a post on Twitter "mounting evidence". In any case, context and intent would have been taken into account when they made the decision to give warnings out and it's their call. Personally, I don't much care who got a warning because they're ultimately meaningless.

I am not delusional,I am also not besotted with Ashleigh ,she was equally as venomous as Helen,most people can see this,stop insulting people who dont agree with you,BOTH were nasty,BOTH should have had a warning.FACT.

With respect, I saw both incidents and Ashleigh was in a rage. So I do see the incidents as equal. Only my view of course, but I know what I saw.

You can say my opinion is biased because I am "besotted" with Ashleigh and I can return the lazy insult and say your opinion is biased because you hate Ashleigh. I know that I am not biased though, I am looking at it completely objectively and comparing the situation, the people involved and the context of everything.

There you go again,'presuming' that people hate Ashleigh because they dont like her,you really dont know everything do you? I have NEVER said I hate her,I dont like her,and there is the difference.