![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
SkyNewsHD
just said they get a free vote but his cabinet must not talk about it? |
Nothing contradictory at all, he has given a free vote, full credit to him for that and also the request for a the length of the debate on same too.
He is right, the Labour movement,Unions and membership are against action overall. Indeed so are the Parliamentary MPs, it is expected up to 80 'could', not 'will', vote for action that still leaves 150 Labour MPs opposed to action. How interesting it would be if Cameron now gave a free vote to his MPs,if he dared to that is. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
'A sample of this weekend’s consultation of Labour Party members, carried out in response to an email from Jeremy Corbyn' Hardly an independent poll is it? YouGov poll vs Corbyn e-mailing the people who elected him hmmm....:think: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He got a resounding no to action. Whoever said it was an independent poll,it was never to be intended as so, however I also know many,like myself,said it should be a free vote for Labour MPs which unlike the Conservative party he has listened to. |
Quote:
|
I think Corbyn had to make it a free vote or face mass resignations from his cabinet. While I applaud the free vote, I don't think he would have chosen that route unless forced to. It's not what he was intending a couple of days ago.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
labour voter does not have a one for one correspondence with labour party member/associate/helper/hanger on/person who lives next door and paid their 30 pence admittance fee.
|
Quote:
What he has done in the intervening days is gather the thoughts and opinions of the Labour movement at large. Which sent him a resounding no to action,from Labour activists ,members and the wider movement. As I said, many like myself.also said there should be a free vote for Labour MPs. Today he has done all that they presented to him and you are wrong with massive respect, he could have actually insisted as the likes of Diane Abbott and even the pundits were saying on the news today,that Labour follow his lead and the whip. As was suggested by the media, this could have meant that David Cameron would not in any way have even risked a vote at all probably if that had been the case. he had other choices and he had stated he would make his decision today which he has. Yesterday you were championing the Conservatives and David Cameron with his/their non existent free vote for Conservative MPs. Very sad indeed you cannot accept that this is the right move and for once now give the guy some credit for allowing his MPs at least the opportunity to vote with their consciences and not under party forced orders. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So, is he hedging his bets, give them a free vote at the same time letting them know they should vote no and hope for the best.:shrug:
Better outcome than whipping them and them not taking notice. Either way, I am glad he has given a free vote...saves the day for him a wee while longer. |
Can't do right for doing wrong springs to mind here :idc:
|
Quote:
I applauded the free vote decision. I think that is the correct move, even if he was pushed into it. |
Quote:
No free vote for the Conservative MPs from their leader and a free vote given by the leader for the Labour ones. Sometimes we have to give credit to anyone who does the right thing, no matter what we think of them personally. Clearly not your thing. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.