I did listen to that programme and it appears there's a lot of upset people. They say that there was no avoidance in the funds but then you have to ask,
why such lengths to be offshore? Of course there was avoidance.

You also have to ask why he very publicly condemned Jimmy Carr for doing exactly the same as what he was doing.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...61_308x441.jpg


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...0201368456.jpg
No Fellas Dave is staying to sort it all out

Jimmy Carr reduced his tax paid to 1%, we are not surely comparing him to the prime minister

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...0201882290.jpg

[The Prime Minister, pictured leaving
the conference today, admitted he
could have handled questions about
his tax affairs better]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz45KWwDcdc

New link to the protest.

What Jimmy Carr did was not illegal but it was morally wrong.
What David Cameron did was not illegal but it was morally wrong.

Nor did Jimmy lie he blabbed o TV and exposed himself, Cameron out and out lied.
I haven't benefitted.... Oh, wait yes I benefitted.

Morally wrong according to which measure?

If something is legal, its fine. No issue, end of story. You cannot be convicted of any crime based on some subjective moral measurement.

I think its morally wrong that people defend religion, but there is nothing i can do about it as its peoples right to do so

No Kizzy
he witheld that info,
Broke no Laws


Corbyn does not want him to resign
he wants Dave to sort it out
Ref: interview on SkyNewsHD live
from Scotland.

No Arista he lied, he stated he had not benefited and then days later admitted he had benefited, ergo...he lied.

Kizzy he sold them
before he was PM


Thats why its OK

Channel 4 News ‏@Channel4News 19h19 hours ago
Exclusive: @channel4news finds third off-shore investment fund linked to David Cameron’s father http://bit.ly/1SF7X63

https://twitter.com/Channel4News

He might have flogged them for a tidy profit, that's beside the point... He still lied about them in the first instance, you can get as bold as you like it won't change that fact.

Well then, the same could be said for Jimmy Carr couldn't it? but Cameron wanted us all to know he thought it was morally wrong.

I adamantly disagree with this loophole in the honey-pot law which allows the super rich to greatly benefit by opening offshore companies. I didn't agree to this law but Cameron did; that btw, doesn't make it alright.

30K

Before he was PM.


Thats why he gets away with it


No Bold up needed

From SkyNewsHD & BBCNewsHD
The PM will publish his Full Tax Returns
from 2010 onwards.


so Kizzy "the First for Ever Leader to do that."


Later tonight maybe
after the Sunday papers are out etc.

If he hadn't lied this might not have been necessary and 1000s of people wouldn't be baying for his resignation...

They can Stomp all they want
He Ain't leaving his Job.


He broke No Laws
That is a Fact

They're angry at the subterfuge I think.

Meh it's a total non-event anyway. If Cameron was to go, he'd just be replaced with some other identikit silver spoon **nthole :shrug:. If it's the tories, what does it matter if it's David Cameron or Plavid Plameron or whoever? Same pig ****er with a different face, tbh.

I was reading the paper today, and I think cameron, and russell brand are the same, because both have not paid one penny to the tax man in their lives, and one tried to keep it under the carpet, and another tried to make himself out as, the anti capitalist hero, these mps and celebrities demand the the british public accept refugees into the country, and would they have these people placed into their homes and mansions, no, cameron and brand have the same number of houses and mansions that have the same price of value,

I would love to see you produce a source that Russell Brand has not paid one penny in tax in his life but of course you wont supply one because it is utter bollocks.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_M4CfuCaw1f...0/3(Wonka).jpg

So now we have Camerons personal tax details but it appears this special form for MP's isn't complete https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...102mp-2016.pdf because there is no mention of 'gift aid'.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...ns-gift-mother

Full credit to the PM for issuing the info today as to his tax returns.

That is commendable, what isn't is the way he tried to avoid doing so earlier in the week with a series of sidestepping actions as to the issue.

He has proven his word that nothing untoward has occurred since he got rid of these funds just before he became PM.
Well that is fine and totally to his credit but the returns he has issued only go back to that time 6 years ago.
The main issues as to this appear to be in the time he had them before 2010.

Now let us have more of the at least leading lights in govt and indeed Opposition doing the same.
Has he cleared up the queries,yes as to his time since Prime Minister, before he became PM, that remains a possible grey area still unless he intends to issue more returns from first becoming leader of the Opposition.

He has done enough for now and quite frankly has enough to do at present too fighting for his political survival with the EU referendum, if that comes back to leave, he is for sure a goner,aided by any doubts and suspicions as to these funds before 2010 which he is hopefully still intending to address now.