Not C5 pretending Tila doesn't exist

Well Ill be, Hayden a girl, I never expected that.

:joker:

She was joking lmao

Chloe Wilburn robbed a family man while he tried to earn a living then put his livelihood and his reputation at risk by falsely accusing him of trying to abuse her so she cover up her own appalling behaviour ....wasn't rumour or just Twitter messages, her actual police record confirmed it...a lot of the people on here screaming for Andrews eviction are the same people who made her the winner of BB2015...

*Chloe WINburn*

My wrong spelling of her surname is the only thing that you can challenge because it's the only thing I didn't get quite correct ...if that's the best you got then best maybe not bother eh

That's an interesting concept ....maybe the dynamics between the two of them will prove or disprove all the theories being thrown about..

Good point.

Just because people assume the Twitter messages are genuine and def Andrews doesn't necessarily confirm they are...Lenny Henry was knighted by the Queen last year and the BBC used a video of Ainsley Harriot on news at ten

By that logic if you think Chloe didn't deserve to win then Andrew doesn't deserve to win either?

I love contextual comparisons

Yes, and the Ainsley Harriet thing was a really stupid mistake; but not vindictive. Not the same as insulting a whole community and being too dickish to understand that this stuff follows you around.

What logic ?...Chloe's crime was actual and directiy targeted a real life victim...it was also confirmed by her police record...Andrews accused of childish and bigotted tweets with a friend...most importantly it's not been proved and he's not had chance to defend himself....Chloe was proved and she had chance to defend herself but instead tried to ruin a guys life to cover her tracks ....
Innocent till proven guilty ....not guilty till proven innocent ....she was proven to be guilty he hasn't been

:joker:

So do channel 5 always have to put someone in the house on launch that they can boot out a few days later then pretend it wasn't to give the person more media attention?

It's getting old now.

The proof is all there for Andrew though? He tweeted those things, there's evidence, it's fact. No "accusations" whatsoever.

So, like I said, if you think Chloe did not deserve to win for her hate crimes then neither should Andrew.

No. He never made those comments as a housemate.

She didn't get booted out so he shouldn't get booted out...she got the majority vote and won....so by that logic.....so can he.....I recognise some of the Chloe fans on here that want him out... the hypocrisy is staggering

Tila got booted out - by your logic Andrew should be too :hee:

Great post.

Gina Rio ‏@iamGinaRio 2h2 hours ago
If @bbuk don't remove Andrew I'm never having anything to do with the show again #Troll #Racist #Prick

Andrew must be removed then, it's decided :clap1:

I love polls that don't go the way the OP wanted them to:laugh:

Sounds more of a reason to have him stay tbqh :fan: #TeamHazel