Until they decide to stop abiding the law.

This is literally the stupidest ****ing thing I've read on this site

You must have few people on ignore then.:joker:

You're the one defending the right for America to remain the bloodbath it's been for many years.

In comparison, I am positively angelic.

Again, no laws completely stop crime but they curb them. If we go by your incredibly flawed logic then there's no point in any laws because they aren't 100% effective.

Screaming

I knew Alex and Jackson were against gun control :inamood:

Bastards.

Gun laws will never stop terrorists. Apart from anything else, they don't even need guns. You can make a bomb from ingredients bought in a chemist.

The killers of Lee rigby used a car and a knife. We wont be banning those.

This isn't a gun issue. It's a muslim terrorist issue.

****ing hell. Sorry guys.

The first post I've read here so far that makes sense.

Yes, America doesn't need stricter gun control because it won't stop the occasional Islamic terrorist attack, who cares if it will help prevent domestic terrorist attacks that are carried out using legal fire arms?? They aren't usually committed by people with a different colour skin to you and follow a religion you're frightened of.

Honestly, at least TRY to think about what you're typing before you post it.

And we're back to Muslim hate speech.

You're honestly so comical.

The biggest prevention of change is the denial that there's a problem.

...sometimes this forum leaves you speechless for all of the wrong reasons...I can think of better alternative threads for the pack versus ThriceShy Part 2....

:conf:

I don't think the forum not really agreeing with racism makes them a "pack".

All my posts make sense.:laugh:

You gotta admit though, its funny watching the pack lose every time.

Aww, bless. The delusion is real.

Being in denial and not accepting being wrong doesn't make you a winner, it makes you ignorant

Islam is a race?:shrug:

What am I wrong about?

This was an Isis attack, as confirmed by everyone official and their dog. The only deniers are people saying that it wasnt.

ISIS have taken credit for it, that doesn't mean it was an ISIS organised attack. Only time will tell if he had direct contact with ISIS members or not.

[The Islamist terror group (ISIS) claims one of its "fighters" is responsible
for the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history.

Islamic State Claims Worst Shooting In US History]

http://news.sky.com/story/1710850/is...-in-us-history