His words are incredibly relevant, if he already believes his wealth and status enable him to get away with sexually assaulting women, God only knows what being the president of the United ****ing States will have him thinking :umm2:

Just think, if there's women who never spoke out about his 'groping' of them because of who he was, then what'll happen if he's the most powerful man on planet earth?

He was mic'd up for a tv show was he not? Like I said, he thought it was private but clearly it wasn't. It's irrelevant to the point anyway but of course you've ignored all the points I made relating to the actual issue.... for some reason

Hopefully the majority will follow suite

How it's being justified is actually beyond belief

The majority of American people see right through the Trump hate multi million pound Hillary Clinton campaign. Just like the British people did with the remoaner's stay campaign scare mongering nonsense about what will happen if we vote out of the EU and will vote for Donald the peoples champion. The people will get the result they want 100% :wavey:

Obviously the people will get the result they want, that is how democracy works :laugh:

lol at how Mark Burnett of all people has now been dragged into this election

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37617068

That's the risk some are willing to take to push for their version of change. We don't really know what he would do as president. He has no political record. His business record he could easily clear up by releasing a few years worth of tax returns, which he refuses to do.

All we have left to judge is his record on being a human being/reality star... and his words... words that aren't worth very much these days since it's plain and clear to anyone that he lies on a dime. That's the only evidence we have to decide if a man should be the president of the United States and subsequently take an influential power role in the world. It's not a strong showing imo, but for some people it's enough :shrug:

Some people are mentioning it's a cheap shot to go after his character. :joker: I beg to digger. Hillary has been through the wringer time and time again and even then, it's still happening. Trump is not exempt.

I can't wait for the post-election/post-office release of this documentary.

..there should never be any private in a conversation finding amusement in sexual assault with someone who is striving to be a world leader...it's of public interest because votes are made on character and integrity of a person as well as other reasons...with the starring role he's hoping to get, there comes responsibility of power but he talks about power/influence in a way that he abuses it, not a way that he lives up to it...his responsibility would be to respect all of his US citizens equally regardless of their gender...


..I was thinking yesterday of how we all have or have had people in our lives/males specifically...granddads/dads/uncles etc who would describe themselves as 'old fashioned' and a big part of that is respect in how they speak to or speak about females...because back in the day you know, that was us....no one of any character ever said the words that he did../would ever have found such the topic of amusement...at the very least and the very best, he's an extremely weak person in feeling he needed to 'impress the ladz' by laughing about sexual assault.../worrying either way tbh...and disrespectful to all genders if he feels that he's representative with his views of some sort of acceptable locker room banter...

"As a producer on seasons one and two I assure you: when it comes to the Trump tapes there are far worse."

But they're not 'able' to release them :think:

I think things like that should have to be released, in the interests of openness and the public being able to make an informed choice when voting. His character and the type of person he is is important imo. And isn't one of the appeals of Trump the idea that he'd be a 'change' to the usual political system? Beginning that change with cover-ups is a great start!

...could you imagine if there was a taped conversation in a school staffroom or something and teachers saying..oh, I just slap those children or whatever...the outrage and how worrying that would be../how rightfully worried parents would be who had their children at that school and also of general public concern as well if in thinking that may be representative of schools and their teaching staff/the carers of their children...and yet Trump is looking to be representative of the whole of the USA...of course, the man he is, is of huge importance...

I was thinking the same thing about my grandad when I was reading some comments the other day. He's in his 80's and he worships the ground my grandma walks on, he talks about her and treats her like she's the most wonderful person in the world and it's something that's always stuck with me and makes me smile when I think about them. It would be unimaginable that he'd ever think or say those kinds of things and he'd be repulsed by Trump's attitude. Honestly it annoys me when Trump's age is used as a defense for him. Things haven't always been great for women politically/socially etc and I think that's the reason age is a go-to excuse for stuff, and I think it's easy to disassociate yourself with a time period if you haven't lived it, but like you suggest, respect, love, decency, they aren't knew concepts that we've just invented, they're pretty basic human traits.

Yeah again I completely agree, I can't fathom the attitude of "he didn't mean for it to be public so just ignore it" at all.

Imagine a criminal defense in court "Well your honour, he burgled the house late at night, dressed in black, even wore a balaclava. He obviously didn't want to be seen so it's unfair to judge him, this is a private matter between him and his victim." :laugh:

I detest this type of thing. The; 'I just want to tell you Kirk that one of your close friends has told me you shag dead pigs, but I won't tell you who it is who said it" syndrome.

Either put up and PROVE what you are alleging, or fecking SHUT UP and say nothing in the first place.

It is wholly unfair to Trump - or any one else - for someone to come out with such statements that there is "much worse" to come, but then say that the 'proof' cannot ever be presented.

It is nothing more than indictment without a trial or evidence.

Unfair and frankly worthless.

It was Livia who told me :fan:

why do women laugh about mens penises being sliced off then on the likes of loose women? how is that ok? and that actually happened

It isn't ok and luckily whoever said that isn't running for President of any country

..it really isn't any source of amusement for any sexual assault or any violence no matter what the gender...

:laugh2: YOU are a scamp too Niamh. :hee: (Ammi will explain)

she suggested obama may be assaisanted? she voted gto illegally bomb 1 million innocent people? compared to that, trumps locker room comments are miniscule. why are we dwelling on such trivialities compared to 1 million dead innocents? shes a vile warmonger who is totally unfit for any office ever

that was attempted murder which actually happened, his was hypothetical trash talk, pretty sure you can see the difference...to put it bluntly , he didnt actually do what he suggested , whereas men have had their penises cut off and nealry bled to death and vast swatches of women have laughed and cheered across tv shows and those women received zero punishment for this massive discrimination and condoning of this horrific violence...

sexual assault is hardly trivial

...Loose Women isn't vast swatches, it's only representative of a few and I have no idea what has been said on there so can't comment...but the whole show has always seem scripted to me for controversial opinions...the same as Donald Trump and his amusement at sexual assault isn't representative of males either...

Just as a side issue here: did this incident prompt anyone else to Google whether on not it is physically possible for someone to be picked up by the vagina?

No just the weirdos :fan: