Okay, sure. But whatever the circumstances - if they were continuing to be Royals, if they were doing celebrity stuff, or if they wanted to live a private life - there's no justification for drones to take creepshots of their child. The gutter press gets away with **** like that far too much.

It's no better than an old perv hiding in the bushes with a camera at the play park.

Massive Karen energy.

Really good points there.

I’d have more sympathy for Meghan if her past wasn’t littered with people she ruthlessly dropped like a hot potato when they didn’t please her or stopped being of use to her. The Royal family are just the latest. I just hope Harry isn’t next down the line, I don’t think he is mentally strong enough to cope.

To be fair though Jet, most people by the age Meghan met Harry would have a past and sone baggage. People have to be ruthless at times to get ahead. I'm sure there are people who we all were very close with at points of our lives who feel dumped or discarded when our lives move on.

...the only slant we know about Meghan’s past is that which the media has given us and it’s our own choice what we believe ...

Of course, but why be ruthless and cruel about it?

As an example her husband found out their marriage was over when she sent her wedding ring back to him in the post.
He (a film producer) had helped her get the part in Suits. After which she had no more use for him. By all accounts he was a wonderful husband. He has never spoken about his hurt publicly or said anything about Meghan but their mutual friends and his family were outraged on his behalf.

"Hollywood actress uses personal connection to get big role", let's run the headlines!!

:joker: :joker:

Harry knew exactly what Meghan was getting into, in his mid 30s he should have had the foresight to steer them away right from the off and that’s why they ended up in this mess, if they had withdrawn from Royal life from day dot things might be different

...an ex husband/wife wouldn’t be someone that would often be thought to have ‘impartiality’ ...but again it’s a choice of believing what is essentially gossip...

You have no idea whether any of that is true, or how much is embellished. Let's be honest, you wouldn't have any more sympathy for her, which is why you're using gossip as nothing more than another stick to beat her with in a thread that isn't about her first marriage.

How on Earth could you possibly know he was a "wonderful" husband? What an odd statement

...her past hasn’t changed from when it’s frequently been said that the dislike of her has come through the course of the Royal marriage..

yep, some valid points here

...it was interesting watching the Princess Diana V The Media programme last night and comparing it to the relationship with the two Royal wives now...Kate may be the ‘media darling’, which she is in how they report her..?...but Meghan is the one they report the most because she’s the commercially profitable one....how they hate that she’s never been grateful for that, how very dare she ..:laugh:..

She was spoilt rotten by her family, her father, mother and step brother all doted on her. She wanted for nothing. She had a loving family, (did anyone see the C5 documentary about this?) yet she told Harry a different story when they met to get his sympathy and inspire feelings of protection towards her.
Remember Harry telling the radio host just after their engagement that the Royal family ‘was the family she never had’?
Thats what started the whole family feud off, with the step sister, step brother and her Dad.
No wonder she didn’t bring Harry to meet her father before the wedding, he would have painted a different family picture and her sob story would have been exposed for the pack of lies that it was.

nice bit of bias what you see from that, how you can see they suck up to Kate as little miss perfect, fits so well in with royal family

and brand Meghan as some sort of villain


*pretendstobeshockedgif*

I couldn't, I said 'by all accounts'. I'm relating what their close mutual friends said. I have not heard of any reason to disbelieve them so far. :shrug:

Im not surprised...people are getting a bit tired of their self centred self pity story.

...nothing of what has been reported about any family relationships is anything other than gossip and hearsay, if it wasn’t then different versions of things wouldn’t exist but there is always more than one truth ...the only thing that we decide is which truth we’ll believe based on our own feelings toward someone...and it’s fine to not like someone with no reason at all, that’s our prerogative too...

This thread isn't about the royal ladies clothes choices either....

Impossible to comment on someone's marriage. It could look perfect to friends and family but behind closed doors its a very different story.