Jamie89 |
28-03-2017 09:25 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason.
(Post 9264146)
Marco was a sleazy attention seeker if anything. I'm really glad he was evicted first because I do genuinely think he would've been a Marc/Bear type character had he stayed in any longer.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by y.winter
(Post 9264334)
I agree + his eviction saved Laura from herself and gave her a decent storyline.
Had he stayed, BB17 would have been tragically sleazy like CBB18. :yuk:
|
Yeah I agree that Marco left at the right time, I don't think he should have stayed any longer, but I think that him being there for just a short time improves him when thinking about his stint, because he was awful and messy etc but he wasn't there long enough to ruin the series, like at the time I think a lot of people thought he would ruin it and that's where a lot of the hate came from, but I think he can be appreciated more in retrospect because of his early exit (not necessarily as a person but as a housemate and his role in the series), if that makes sense? Like he did have a positive impact in a lot of ways, his impact on Laura's arc, him breaking the female first evictee curse (and acting as a shield to Emma in that first eviction <3)... and as much as he was sleazy and attention seeking, I don't think he was actually a bad person from what I remember, like he wasn't cruel or nasty to people and he generally seemed fairly nice/friendly underneath all of his other faults.
|