No gays, no bi's, no gobshytes, no weirdos
 

I hope we have all regular people for the last series. No extremes, no promises of "telling people what they think to their faces:sleep:". No one who is defined by their sexual prefs.

just people. people are everybit as interesting than fake extreme people.

here's hoping...

So gay and bi people are extremes and aren't regular people?

statistically that is correct

both are under 5% of the population total of the UK

This tread is stupid ,
straight people can just be as extreme as gay/bi people
charlie , told people what she though of them to her face , shes not gay or bi
Stupid thread !

Asking for no gays is like asking for no fake boobs. In 2010, it's not happening. I'm crossing my fingers for no charity cases though...even if they deserve to win it seems unfair.

Well i'm sure a lot of people fall into a minority group so by your thinking the range of potential housemates would vastly decrease. Are people who aren't white not regular people? Are people with disabilities not regular? Are people with a certain eye colour not regular?
People should be put in the house on their personality alone, of course that doesn't happen for example we have to have a few good looking guys to keep the teenage girls watching. I think its really wrong to ask for certain people not to be in. We should judge housemates on their personality, nothing else.

i should have included no women with bags of saline solution sewn into their chests either. damn

no

the gays just fall into type and hang around with the women pretending to be women and thus act as ugly women.

this then reduces the number of guys in the house

people who define their person by their sexuality tend to be dull so lets not have them

So we won't have any straight males or females who are likely to hook up & form a couple?

Shall we also count out Glamour models, anyone with any sort of disability/health condition & certain ethnic minorities too?

Ridiculous, Big Brother's popular BECAUSE of it's versatile housemates.

LeatherTrumpet, you're an idiot. :) My reasons are obvious.

I didn't know someones sex was determined by who they hung around with
I think we should look at people as individuals rather that as part of groups according to their sexuality. It's very old fashioned to just stereotype a group and dislike them. There is a lot of diversity between gays like there is between straight people.

Nazi!

correct. no Nazis either, or anyone from the Hull area due to the accent.

I am afraid that is not how peeps are chosen for BB

I have no problems with the disabled, but in a popularity contest for money they basically have immunity and that's boring.

Gay is 100% fine, but I'd rather not see anything like this:
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/a...80_501789a.jpg
ever. again.

If you'd written this post on Digital Spy, not only would you have been banned for life, but they would probably have also reported you to the police.:nono:

But I agree to a large extent to what you said.:joker: :D

Digital Spy is run by a gay mafia and do homosexuality no favours

:joker:

Dennis was vile, What kinda person spits in someones face! D:

No liverpudlians! Accentt goes right through me!!!

They're run by some extreme politically correct organisation that doesn't live in the real world. :)

http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/bb.../marco_lge.jpg

the worst offender

He has thick hair now. You wouldn't recognise him.

LT reported to the Police
now that would be fun.

I loved Marco!
He was a fun character with a good heart :)

ahhh i know! he's really good looking now!!

Brian BB2? Dan BB5? Derek BB6? Michael BB7? and to some extent, Richard BB7?

They were all great BB contestants &weren't particularly defined by their sexuality.