Why shouldn't Dave win? Even if he is a con artist!
 

It's hilarious watching all the posters on the forum getting their knickers in a twist over Dave, because *in their opinion* he is a bad person, con artist, fake whatever, blah, blah. But isn't it funny how those same posters don't want to hold their fave HMs up to the same scrutiny as Dave - it's almost as if they are just bias and trying to find any reasons to get votes against Dave to save their own fave HM (but that couldn't be their motive could it :shocked: LOL.)

Give it up. Dave deserves votes for what he has done in the house and not what he has or has not done out of the house. It is game show!!! Not judgement day!!!

You're only going on about Dave to save your own HM, enough with YOUR fake *moral high ground*.

Obviously BB checked his background and they are fine with it, so he is OK, if he wasn't OK BB would not have put him in the house.

He gets my vote to go on Friday, based on his personality in the house. Obnoxious twit that he is.:hugesmile:

I like Dave. Hope he makes the final!

I do not have any favourite, and St. Dave is nothing but a charlatan who conned BB into INVITING him in, they probably thought it would be hilarious to have him lurching around in a "drunken stupor" for weeks!

I'm not voting for any favourite - but I object to the principle of BB inviting him on to BB because of his 'cult' and I object to his sumbliminal evangelizing on our screens! And no, I am not religious, I just have respect for those that are and the 'Joe Bloggs' average decent human being!

Wahey! Gwan Abhorsen!

Each and every one of the housemates in that house has been called out as fake on some aspect of their personality, so it's a good point, arent they conmen too? If what they are portraying is not what they really are?

FWIW I only support housemates regarding their time in the house and not out of it aswell, and I'd be happy for a Dave or Josie win :D

It's also hilarious watching the Dave fans try to discredit others that dislike Dave... making assumptions that it must be down to tactics to save their faves.

I'm sure alot of people just dislike Dave because of certain traits in his personality that are not very likeable.

I have no faves in the house btw.

I'm not bothered whether Rasputin is a con-man or not!!
I just cannot stand the 'two-faced back-stabbing Judas' for what he did to Ben!!
I was over the moon when 'Snakeymario' gave him some of his own medicine in the S+R!!...Best thing that the 'little Viper' has done since he took the mole outfit off!! :devil:

I don't doubt that a lot of forummers would applaud and support Osama bin Laden if he was in the house! On the premise that, who cares what he does on the outside, he makes me laugh!

Note : There's a little underhanded attempt by our mate fingers to compare Dave to Osama Bin Laden.

Seriously, if fingers & some of the other anti-Dave posse...(who, monotonously for most of the last 10 weeks have filled this forum with hate threads and posts), if they could of channeled some of that energy into positivity, the world would be a slightly better place! :)

AS usual you get the twisting of words to suit an agenda, where did I compare St. Dave to Osama bin Laden?? unlike one of of your mates on DS who compared him to Jesus Christ.

See, there you are getting another lil dig at him. Breathe deeply and relax, BB will be all over in 9 days....

When your mate St. Dave breathes deeply it is a sign that he is lying.

I'm sorry, but you're going to have to explain that. Do all the other housemates run organizations that I don't know about that exploit and lie to some of the most vulnerable members of society?

Posted on DSpy by Blissed_off:

Oh yes, that bloody wheelchair video.
Right, for those that were questioning why Dave was filmed in a wheelchair, here goes.
For years the church has placed so much importance on our efforts, on what we as people do, not on what Jesus Christ has already done on the cross.
Dave was immobilzed by the presence of God, completely blotto. He wanted to show that you don't even need to walk to carry the presence of Jesus and manifest the finished work of the cross, our effort is not required, Jesus did it all! It's awesome.
Dave was aware that it was a controversial thing to do, Jesus often did controversial things. Yes what he did is open to misinterpretation and misunderstanding but he did it anyway as he had a point to prove.

He was not pretending to be disabled to fleece money out of people as people have intimated.

As far as I'm aware none of the other housemates have fleeced cancer victims out of money on the outside & told them they can cure them for £30... But if they did I would hate them just as much as I hate Dave... :xyxwave:

I dont like Dave

I always thought dave WAS your favourite fingers:conf:

You spend so much of your time on here talking about him:joker:

Excuse me ? have you lost someone with cancer ? have you ever had cancer yourself ? if you answer yes to either of these question wyou would KNOW without asking why this lowlife conman shouldnt even be in the BB house ,never mind win it,

Vindication of our posts will come on Friday when the Charlatan gets his marching orders and can bugger off back to Wales and his stupid Cult.

What a great name fo a Film or his Epitaph! "Back to Oblivion"

chuff get off your high horse please.

As someone that has lost both my father and mother to cancer I have no problemn with Dave, even if he is "selling" hope to some fellow believers, or his fellow believers saying what they actually believe even if I disagree with it.

this is just another anti dave stick that is being USED to beat him with and something I find as equally repulsive as you seem to take the claims he, and fellow believers, make about faith healing:nono:

Shame on you

there have been other con artist winners but they had much more game. dave has no game whatsoflipping ever.

Dave can cure cancer with the lord - he should win :thumbs:

You think that brainwashing and taking advantage of cancer patients has no bearing on somebody's character? That there is nothing insidious or exploitative in what he does? And more to the point, are you really so flippant that you can say somebody's comments on an internet forum are 'equally repulsive'?