Would you feel comfortable being voted for in Controversy II?
 

I'll use this as a gauge of who does and who doesn't want to be voted for. It's a public poll since I obviously need to see who doesn't want to be included. If it is to go ahead then I think this is the only viable method.

With this, however, permabanned and currently-banned members cannot take part... I'm just wondering whether we should include them or not.

Again if you're not sure - by clicking "yes" you're consenting to other TiBB users to vote, anonymously, you and to give reasons that are critical and sometimes nasty about you. It's not a free-for-all, however: I do not allow death threats, racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic or extremely personal (ie. stuff to do with family, sensitive topics) attacks. By clicking "No" you will not be able to be voted for. Only those who click "yes" would be able.

Idgaf what people say. Bring on the hate. :love:

''karl is a 4 eyed wanker''
:bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:

Yes, I am completely comfortable with any abuse...

Yeah.


Could be fun tbh :joker:

Yes,im interested at how many insults and Jedward puns are gonna be given lol.

I'm not sure what Controversy is exactly but yes, I don't mind having my irritations pointed out, there's no point in just having the good stuff in 'Most Loved' and not balancing it out....I am flawed

Yes. Let's see if someone can top calling me a stylish butt plug to Stacey.

I would love to read my hate comments :worship:

No surprise at who isn't comfortable and hearing the truth :idc:

Nope. Not that I am uncomfortable with it: but I don't see why I and others get infracted throughout the rest of the time on Tibb for the same type of comments - that will inevitable be put up on that type of thread.

Will have to think of someone to take Pyras place on my list now

I really don't give a damn what you think Smithy.

bottom line is: we get infracted at any other stage for this type of thing - I don't see why there should be some amnesty for being allowed to do that hidden under the cloak of "Most contraversial".

:laugh3:

I just realised that all the people that are taking part with me,I dont even hate them.

no digs at those who vote 'no', people. *facepalms*

There's a point to it really. It allows the release of tension without any ramifications, and with anonymity. Its a chance to get all your feelings out and its oddly calming once you do imo. :joker:

But if you don't agree than thats perfectly fine I suppose. :)

You clearly missed my point. Let's not kid on about anonymity either since we all know who'd be pming each other with who said what about who, and who can get away with saying the worst.

It is perfectly fine for me to disagree, no suppose about it. :)

Yes but wouldn't you agree that its better for everyone to let it out once/twice a year without knowing who said what, rather than constant arguments and insults throughout the year?

I expect a few cutting comments from The Grots to come my way, and probably quite a few others. Like I said, it's good to know your flaws so you can work on them. :hugesmile:


Although I would struggle this year as I don't hate nowhere near as many as last year. Last year had some very annoying members.

If I did agree with it, I would have not voted or have said what I have already.

Okay. I was just saying y'know.

If it stays the way it is,im interested to see how far in front I can go of the rest.:devil:

:laugh3:


I forgot somebody said that. We need the thread undeleted.

I think the front runners for this years award would be myself, Scott & Pyramid. I can't actually think who else annoys a lot of people. Oh, maybe Beastie.