gay couples to adopt is a form of child abuse, says UKIP election candidate
 

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...66_306x423.jpg
"Allowing gay couples to adopt is a form of child abuse, says UKIP election candidate
Winston McKenzie is standing in this week's Croydon North by-election
Former boxer says letting same sex couples adopt is a violation of children's human rights
He also accuses gay celebrities of coming out 'as a fashion'"



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2DRpWLlko

What a Fool
He could have won that Election.

Haha, He also looks like a complete *****

He shot himself in the foot

I'm pleased this biggoted 'party' are outing themselves as totally backwards, any credibility they had is gone...

I bet he secretly loves the willy

Boom

The Highest rated comment on there surprised me

****ing hell I despair for the people who wrote those top comments.

Daily Mail readers in acting like ******** shocker?

Welcome to the BNP Lite party and the paper of the reactionary right.

some of the comments on there are just horrendous

Everyone its daily ****ing fail, what do you expect :conf:

Them not be like that

No way.

The underclass have the BNP
everyone else has UKIP
ignorance packaged and presented with a more socially acceptable bow...

Bit lazy to compare them to the BNP, they're not really similar at all

But yeah it's a pretty dumb comment, will erase a lot of the sympathy Ukip have received over the foster parents thing

Although what he said is more than awful, I'm glad that it's been exposed. UKIP getting any power in this country is an appalling thing. They're nothing but a backwards and destructive lot.

I think it's also disgusting that he's suggested that gay celebrities coming out of the woodwork is nothing more than a fashion. Nothing makes my blood boil more than when someone suggests being gay is a matter of choice or lifestyle.

I'm no supporter of UKIP, but a lot of their policies are what people have been screaming for... no cuts to front line police, scrap tuition fees and reintroduce the student grant, raise pensions... unfortunately some of their other policies are archaic and bigoted. That said, I'm sure that the comments made by the idiot referred to in the original post won't be appearing in the UKIP manifesto anytime soon.

What a twat :bored:

I think the Child abuse that is mentioned in the opening post refers to the years of playground abuse name calling and bullying the poor unsuspecting child will have to endure after he or she inadvertently lets it slip that he/she has two daddies and no mummy and that his/her two daddies sleep together in a big bed.

Children can be particularly cruel....!!!!

I cannot believe there is support for this behaviour....
Are we not living in an elightened age where intolerance is frowned upon?
I worry, we appear to be stuck firmly in reverse here ...If we allow the dark ages of forbidden love and dirty family secrets to be the way to live for same sex couples!
Children up and down the UK are crying out for loving families, how draconian to suggest that cannot nurture or provide the stability and guidence kids need!
I do not find it 'lazy' to compare them to the BNP either, this kind of influence that demonises people because of their sexual preference, is not a million miles from their views of foreigners to me.
What is happening to equality?
Has anyone actually asked the children in these cases their view?
No... It seems it is the blinkered, new right attitudes that in my opinion have no place in modern day society.

children can taunt each other over mobile phone brands, I don't think we should ban them because of it. Thankfully most outgrow such childish behaviour.

The words of moronic bigots mean very little to me.

Gender and sexuality doesn't matter when it comes to good parenting, I bet most children in the system just want a loving home and wouldn't care if their parents were gay or not. A good home is a good home and they are in short supply these days so there's no point in limiting them even further.

That's not what it's referring to, from the article:

Oh yeah sure, let's just prevent gay couples from adopting then for the reasons you suggested and continue to portray the message that it is indeed wrong to children. Have you ever thought that perhaps by putting the wheels in motion for reform you might in time end up where something is regarded as normal? If there's more of it, it's less 'deviant' and is less susceptible to questioning and indeed abuse. But nah...***** it, let's just pander to the problem.

That just makes me cringe. Not the fact that it's homophobic, just because it's such a cringeworthy thing to say. 'Two men who kiss regularly'...who the hell talks like that?