ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   government puts porn block on EVERY home (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=231232)

Fetch The Bolt Cutters 22-07-2013 09:08 AM

government puts porn block on EVERY home
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-opt-rule.html

:mad:

Jake. 22-07-2013 09:13 AM

Cameron acting like he's never had a tactical :bored:

Jordan. 22-07-2013 09:17 AM

Another reason to hate kids

Jack_ 22-07-2013 09:18 AM

'Victory for the Mail' how nauseating

They'll publish this article and then next on the sidebar will be 'leggy 14 year old looks good in dress as she steps out with her celebrity mum'

****ing ******s

swinearefine 22-07-2013 09:18 AM

they're so off the mark, porn made my childhood 10x better

Fetch The Bolt Cutters 22-07-2013 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6195781)
Another reason to hate kids

Quote:

Originally Posted by swinearefine (Post 6195784)
they're so off the mark, porn made my childhood 10x better

:worship:

Jack_ 22-07-2013 09:23 AM

Quote:

'The Daily Mail has campaigned hard to make internet search engine filters “default on”. Today they can declare that campaign a success'

David Cameron, Prime Minister
I feel seriously ill. Seriously, who listens and panders to the Daily ****ing Mail of all people?

Perhaps if they actually bothered to make sex ed better instead of the prudish tame mess it is now kids wouldn't be so inclined to turn to watching porn and think that it represents real life.

Oh...and another thing, if a parent doesn't want their child watching porn...then do something about it and protect your own bloody child and monitor their internet access. Better parenting and less government interference kthxbai

Marc 22-07-2013 09:24 AM

I'll just have to go back to masturbating on the bus

Ryan57 22-07-2013 09:25 AM

Parents can block this if need be. Making it out to be a big thing is pathetic.

Victory for The Mail also, eh? How fantastic. Maybe the next step can be to exposing the Royals and what our government really get up to? Or maybe exposing the plans for a New World Order? Y'know, something that needs to be done?

Vicky. 22-07-2013 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 6195796)
I feel seriously ill. Seriously, who listens and panders to the Daily ****ing Mail of all people?

Perhaps if they actually bothered to make sex ed better instead of the prudish tame mess it is now kids wouldn't be so inclined to turn to watching porn and think that it represents real life.

Oh...and another thing, if a parent doesn't want their child watching porn...then do something about it and protect your own bloody child and monitor their internet access. Better parenting and less government interference kthxbai

The daily mail help the current government whip up hatred of poor people in order to have less resistance to cruel cuts and such. Cameron is in their pocket because of this. IMO.

Ryan57 22-07-2013 09:29 AM

Whatever next I wonder? Websites citing the truth about higher authorities banned?

Jack_ 22-07-2013 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 6195783)
'Victory for the Mail' how nauseating

They'll publish this article and then next on the sidebar will be 'leggy 14 year old looks good in dress as she steps out with her celebrity mum'

****ing ******s

Just as I thought

They run a campaign like this and then publish articles as vile and as objectifying as this

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...on-stroll.html

'The cropped vest top was just short enough to expose the upper region of her toned stomach'

SHE'S 15 FFS STOP TAKING PICTURES LIKE THIS AND WRITING ARTICLES ABOUT IT

Glenn. 22-07-2013 09:48 AM

I'm packing myself off to an nunnery then.

Tom4784 22-07-2013 09:48 AM

It's pretty ridiculous and unneeded, there's ways to prevent kids from searching for porn that doesn't restrict millions of people's rights to view it.

arista 22-07-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott (Post 6195766)



Scott we are talking about illegal porn only


" Statement, Google said: ‘We have a zero tolerance attitude
to child sexual abuse imagery. Whenever we discover it,
we respond quickly to remove and report it."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2ZlbDaLaO

Ryan. 22-07-2013 09:54 AM

Disgusting victory for draconian censorship and fans of Orwellian nanny-states if this goes ahead. This isn't about being a dirty man on the internet, its about drawing the line between the government and people's personal lives. The onus should be on good parenting, good sex education and building healthy relationships with both sex and pornography. A wide-flying net like this is a horrible slippery slope.

Today its porn, tomorrow its websites that disagree with the government and their beliefs. Before you know it, its Police and Army raiding your house, burning your books and threatening action on your 'anti-establishment lifestyle'. This is by any measure an attack on civil liberties.

I have no doubt the women's rights campaigners, fussy parents and feminists will paint me as a pervert, paedophile, rape apologist or all the other horrible things under the sun. But this is how it starts people. We are sleepwalking into 1984. The scary thing is that people seem to be calling for it.

/rant over

Vicky. 22-07-2013 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 6195884)
Scott we are talking about illegal porn only

No, its not only illegal porn.

arista 22-07-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 6195887)
No, its not only illegal porn.




Yes it is.


Porn is not effected

Lee. 22-07-2013 09:57 AM

Would this stop them from being able to see it on their phones, iPods, tablets etc?

arista 22-07-2013 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc (Post 6195798)
I'll just have to go back to masturbating on the bus


Make sure Scott is on Bus

arista 22-07-2013 09:59 AM

direct.tv have a adult section you pay once (small fee)only then its Free.
For Example.

Ryan. 22-07-2013 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee. (Post 6195894)
Would this stop them from being able to see it on their phones, iPods, tablets etc?

Yes. The default filters are applied at the ISP level, so any device connected to your Wi-Fi would be blocked. I don't understand why millions of normal, unmarried people without kids are being forced to ring up and say 'Hey I wanna jerk off to Big Bitches 7, unlock it please'

Opt-out of porn is so much easier, and actually understandable. All this does is demonise sexual thoughts of any type. Its typical Daily-Mail headline winning nanny-state fodder.

Vicky. 22-07-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 6195892)
Yes it is.


Porn is not effected

Quote:

By the end of next year, all 19million UK homes currently connected to the net will be contacted by service providers and told they must say whether family-friendly filters that block all porn sites should be switched on or off.


I know you are desperate to defend the government in everything they do arista, but no need to twist the story :whistle:

arista 22-07-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee. (Post 6195894)
Would this stop them from being able to see it on their phones, iPods, tablets etc?


Only when in Cafe
starbucks or Cafe nero etc

arista 22-07-2013 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 6195899)
I know you are desperate to defend the government in everything they do arista, but no need to twist the story :whistle:


No I am not.


This is not blocking current users (they just click Yes to Legal porn)
its new computers

I have No Family Filter


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.