If that happened to a man, would anyone have been expelled?
 

double standards

point is .. it didn't happen to a man..

It did happen to a man in BB14. Hazel pulled down Daley's boxer shorts. She was warned, but not removed.

That said, I think the context matters. If it happened to a man and he was seriously upset / uncomfortable by it, perhaps the woman would be removed. I'd hope so, anyway.

No because men are not aloud to be exploited

It's not double standards because that hasn't happened.

Are you mystic meg?

If Chloe had been a man and had walked into the toilet uninvited as she did, she would have been removed

oops heh glad I missed that :D small furry objects scare me :joker:

Nope.

If Jeremy ran out crying because Chloe grabbed his penis no one would react. Chloe would just get a warning for it.

Although it's impossible for us to judge a double standard as this hasn't happened. On paper it's unlikely the same cause of events would happen though and the woman would just get a strong warning at most.

Was she asked to sleep in another room like Jeremy was?

No she/he wouldn't have :unsure:

No

No, thy probably thought she'd had enough punishment after Daley half choked her

:clap1:

Daley had just chocked the women, of course she wasn't told to sit in another room.

The **** people spout in here makes me sick.

I didn't know about the full details about the incident with Daley.

Although I can say for sure that if a woman had done to a man what Jeremy done to Chloe she would not have been expelled.

am I the only one who noticed cami alluding to domestic violence? In I think the second episode somebody asked her if kirk norcross had cheated on her, and she said no because if he had she would be in prison... what

Its a joke...surely Jeremy will be back...Chloe can not be real

It depends how the man reacted.

But what did happen? We're banned from seeing the video. :conf2:

I don't think you can compare this happening to a man as the same thing. If it happens to a man its not threatening but to a woman it is. That's not a double standard it's just how it is.

I'm pretty sure she was alluding to her chopping off a certain vital male limb :hehe:

No, that actually is a double standard. Surely, it's inappropriate to expose someone else, period?

What a sick thing to say

so a man cant be a victim of sexual or physical abuse

you need to look it up

It is inappropriate of course but I don't think it's threatening in the same way.

Woman exposes man = inappropriate

Man exposes man = inappropriate

Man exposes woman = inappropriate + threatening

Woman exposes woman = inappropriate

She's wrong about one thing. She wouldn't be in prison. The cops will laugh at him for complaining about being hit by a woman and at most she will get is a restraining order.
However if he tried to defend himself when she was attacking him and he pushed her to the floor, he's spend at least a night in jail possibly more.

Gender equality in 2015!