'Anonymous' Hackers To Expose Child Sex Abusers
 

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-762x428.jpg

Activist network Anonymous is planning a day of action to expose establishment child abuse and cover ups.


The group, best known for high-profile computer hacks, has codenamed its latest task 'Operation Death Eaters' and is demanding an end to secrecy around abuse networks.

It says it will collect and then publish mass information on abuse scandals in the UK and around the world in the hope of ensuring people are fully aware of "paedo-sadist" abuse.

A London-based activist, who uses the pseudonym Jake Davis, told Sky News: "This isn't a situation where we are looking to create mayhem. It's about giving the public information so we can confront these problems that go back decades.

"The stories that are coming out are the torture and murder of children with our trusted politicians and that is unacceptable.

More at the link

http://news.sky.com/story/1426605/an...ld-sex-abusers

Good on them

Give Us the names then
Fella with mask

:clap1:

Soon.

I can't wait. How about starting a predictions thread?

Supporting them when they do something illegal that we approve of makes it harder to disapprove when they do something illegal we don't like.

Such as?...

Well done to them.

I take it you're asking me...

These people break the law. Just because they're doing something we approve of by exposing paedophiles doesn't make them right legally. What if they decide they're going to expose something that threatens our national security, or threatens the safety of operatives working for national security? Lawlessness is not an answer.

If if's and but's were candy and nuts.... they aren't threatening national security are they, they're cracking peadophile rings within the establishment that's what we're discussing here.
It's an ethical no brainer and morally when you weigh up the pros and cons of using the technology we have to expose child abusers it's a civic duty to act.... especially when it's those who are making the laws that are breaking them.

I was up for this Livia at first, but actually thinking about it after reading your post, I have changed my mind.

You are right, you are absolutely right. The Law is the Law. It should be rigid and equitable and either apply to all, or be changed by due process.

As you say; it is wrong to approve breaking the law because of a 'the end justifies the means' mentality, and this 'Hacking' action is fraught with very real dangers - both to our individual liberties and our national security.

I was so eager to learn which political figures were on the list that I did not think it through.

Anybody that places "the law" above ethics and morality will most likely be old and behind the times anyway.

I really care more about truth and exposing immorality and corruption that is rife amongst government and law makers.
Anybody protecting kiddy fiddlers because "its the law" or because that's how they make their money are irresponsible or greedy.

As a freeman i have the right to know what the people are elected to lead this country are doing.
I applaud anybody that tells the truth even if it isnt what we want to hear.

Wow, they might actually do something good

Awesome

Uh, no. Laws are what keep society from crumbling. If you don't like a law, work to change it.

They've done good before. Don't mess with cats!

Uh, no.I think you must have imagined a bit where i said no laws :laugh:
Oh dear. Placing ethics and personal morality above the the law is what gets laws changed you must of misunderstood.

Wow this should be interesting...bet some are ****ting themselves :laugh:

It's strange that drug laws are so easily flouted and many are happy to turn a blind eye to this and maybe even partake themselves a little... but when it comes to breaking the law to benefit children there's a sudden need to stringently uphold the law.
Baffling.

Agree...... a bit like vigilantism we like it when known thieves and muggers are brought down, but when innocent people are attacked by these groups in error then we realise it is a double edged sword.






.

I think even they will struggle to unmask the people who are part of these types of groups. They tend to inhabit the Dark web and use very well encrypted serch engines which leave no trace of their IP addresses.





.

That logic is not really applicable in this case is it?

A person cannot accidentally be part of a peadophile ring.

Yeah.....weak analogy, but you get the jist......:laugh:






.

No I don't, If there is a way to expose these monsters then I believe there should be support for them. I would of course prefer it if it was the establishment weeding out their own deviants but this will do for me.