ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums - Megan allowed to leave the house for a photoshoot? (Denied by Channel 5 so no)

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)

- CBB17 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=683)

- - Megan allowed to leave the house for a photoshoot? (Denied by Channel 5 so no) (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=294828)

Megan allowed to leave the house for a photoshoot? (Denied by Channel 5 so no)

At least they didn't call it "CELEB B BRO"... But yeah, another nail in the formats coffin.

Not another one allowed out

Again, why not use the Task Room for the photoshoot? They could fit whatever props and extras they need in there...

Here's the article:

Quote:

CELEBRITY Big Brother descended into farce last night after it emerged that model Megan McKenna will be allowed to leave the house to do a photo-shoot.

And the show was plunged into further controversy when fans claim they spotted Kim Kardashian’s pal Jonathan Cheban holding a mobile phone.

A source said: “These things are totally against the rules but it shows how much power these celebrities have to do what they want. It makes a mockery of the show.”

Big Brother has always billed itself as a “social experiment-cum-game show”.

Viewers are led to believe that housemates are locked up for the duration of the series without any home comforts.

They are not permitted gadgets such as phones, iPads or TVs.

“It makes a mockery of the show”
Source
And they are not allowed to leave the house or have any contact with the outside world except for medical or family emergencies.

But we can reveal that on Monday, Channel 5 bosses are allowing Ex On The Beach beauty Megan, 23, to leave the house in Borehamwood, Herts, for a glamour shoot.

It is believed this will take place in London and is a prior commitment before she signed for CBB.

Bosses told Megan she can go ahead and it means she will rake in more cash on top of her rumoured £30,000 appearance fee.

In another controversy, eagle-eyed fans claim they saw US reality star Jonathan, 41, with a smartphone.

During a short burst of live footage from the house screened on the 5* side channel, Kim Kardashian’s pal was seen with a device in his hand.

But it was later revealed that it is in fact a LuMee – a new illuminated phone case which he has helped to promote in the US.

A source said: “He hates being parted from his phone, so this case is like a security blanket for him.”

Meanwhile, Megan incurred the wrath of Nancy Dell’Olio in a spat over a bottle of wine.

Megan thought the Italian diva had stolen a bottle of red for herself so she snatched it back.

But Nancy explained that she kept the wine back so everyone could toast Kristina Rihanoff’s baby news.

Nancy, 54, hissed at Megan: “You’re a little child. Never go in my space!”

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...n-Cheban-phone

Disappointed isn't even the word - first John's allowed out for rehearsals and now this. Is there no integrity left in this show?

I would believe this considering how lenient they are with crap like this but yesterday the DS claimed that CBB was on the brink of being axed over 100-odd complaints... so erm, yeah? Nah?

Especially given that the two are owned by different people now

Quote:

He hates being parted from his phone, so this case is like a security blanket for him

http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/up...-real-life.jpg

What kind of excuse is that for Jonathan??? A phone case being a security blanket lmao :joker:

Contact with the outside world yay :love:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 8405901)

What kind of excuse is that for Jonathan??? A phone case being a security blanket lmao :joker:

To be fair taking in a phone case isn't the most stupid of ideas, it probably helps him out a bit

Jonathan did actually say that on live feed too welp

Quote:

Big Brother has always billed itself as a “social experiment-cum-game show”.

Lol

Megan need not have gone and calmly apologised to Nancy and show true remorse that they took the wine thinking she was hiding it. In all fairness wine and other things have been found hidden in housemates lockers and under beds in the past. Nancy should (as suggested on BBBOTS tonight) have said I will keep aside a bottle to toast Christinas baby and then put it under her bed. Why didn't she tell the others? Nobody knows for sure why it was there. But I thought it was 'big' of Megan to apologise and tell her that she was sorry they took the wine. Nancy needs to grow up. She has gone down in my estimations and by the looks of twitter she is STILL talking about it

'
“It makes a mockery of the show”
Source
And they are not allowed to leave the house or have any contact with the outside world except for medical or family emergencies.'

Erm...not been like that for years. And not even just the celeb one :joker:

hmmmmm, i wonder. nah surely not.

a free 2 week gym pass?

Quote:

Originally Posted by rionablue (Post 8405927)

Let's be honest Megan shouldn't have been looking through Nancy's space or touching anything there. She should have asked her about the wine not gone and taken it. It doesn't matter why Nancy put it there, no one should have been in Nancy's personal space.

As to going out, none of them should be going out but I guess if she was already contracted to do it if they signed her late, what can they do?

Obviously she has been told on the outside that she is being viewed as irrelevant and this latest outburst is a direct result of that outside contact.

Her make up is as thick as she is, truly ugly.

Think she should be leaving to see a psychologist tbh, rather than for a photoshoot :whistle:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 8425825)

Think she should be leaving to see a psychologist tbh, rather than for a photoshoot :whistle:

This indeed

Would love to hear the shows response tbh.See how they explain it.As sampvt said she will 100% here info on how she is viewed and change her behaviour accordingly.It is a mockery of what the show is supposed to be about.