ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Church of England Troll Pro Dawkins (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=297962)

Crimson Dynamo 15-02-2016 08:24 AM

Church of England Troll Pro Dawkins
 
https://static-secure.guim.co.uk/sys...awkins-010.jpg


Church of England defends prayer tweet for Richard Dawkins after stroke


Twitter users accuse church of ‘trolling’ the famous atheist, but it insists it was wholly genuine in its concern for Dawkins’ health

http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...wkins-well.jpg

The Church’s post was retweeted more than 1000 times, with many people speculating that the concern was less than sincere.

Some commenters accused the Church of “trolling” Dawkins and suggested praying for someone who was not religious was disrespectful.

(he is ok and will make a full recovery)


______________________


shade?

Marsh. 15-02-2016 08:28 AM

May God bless him in this difficult time. :love:

Lee. 15-02-2016 08:28 AM

Don't think it's disrespectful at all! When Samuel was ill quite a few folk asked if I would mind prayers being said for him during church services.. Although I'm not a believer, I was grateful that they would think of doing it at all .

Crimson Dynamo 15-02-2016 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8516934)
May God bless him in this difficult time. :love:

which one?

:suspect:

Marsh. 15-02-2016 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8516938)
which one?

:suspect:

Mine! :fist:

Ammi 15-02-2016 08:34 AM

..it's just wishing positive thoughts really...

Kizzy 15-02-2016 08:39 AM

Saw this yesterday, on the surface it seems reasonable but is it usual? Do the CofE as a collective usually tweet these kind of messages, if not I can see why it would be seen as insincere.

Crimson Dynamo 15-02-2016 08:47 AM

well I hope David Bowie got prayers and Lemmy

Crimson Dynamo 15-02-2016 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8516944)
Mine! :fist:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbLKIEpWwAAI4Cg.jpg:large

joeysteele 15-02-2016 09:24 AM

[QUOTE=Lee.;8516937]Don't think it's disrespectful at all! When Samuel was ill quite a few folk asked if I would mind prayers being said for him during church services.. Although I'm not a believer, I was grateful that they would think of doing it at all .[/QUOTE]

A really good statement, by the way great to have you back on here Lee.

Lee. 15-02-2016 09:26 AM

Thank you Joey :)

Kazanne 15-02-2016 09:40 AM

I'm sure some people just want something to moan about,i see no harm in that, nice they even thought of him

Niamh. 15-02-2016 09:40 AM

Oh he had a stroke? I hadn't heard, hope he makes a full recovery

bots 15-02-2016 09:43 AM

I see nothing wrong with it at all :shrug:

user104658 15-02-2016 09:49 AM

Agree with the Kizzmeister - all you have to do is see whether or not they do this for a lot of celebrities. If it's pretty common for them to tweet "pray for..." messages when someone in the public eye is unwell, then I'd be inclined to accept that it's genuine well wishing.

If they DON'T do it very often and have specifically done it for Mr Dawkins... Then it seems a little bit suspect, doesn't it.

Note: I personally am not going to trawl through the CofE's twitter to find out but would be interested in the results if someone else wants to...

Kizzy 15-02-2016 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 8517030)
Agree with the Kizzmeister - all you have to do is see whether or not they do this for a lot of celebrities. If it's pretty common for them to tweet "pray for..." messages when someone in the public eye is unwell, then I'd be inclined to accept that it's genuine well wishing.

If they DON'T do it very often and have specifically done it for Mr Dawkins... Then it seems a little bit suspect, doesn't it.

Note: I personally am not going to trawl through the CofE's twitter to find out but would be interested in the results if someone else wants to...

Go on, you know you want to you cynical heathen!
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1wyvpQuG01qfouyi.gif

user104658 15-02-2016 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 8517042)
Go on, you know you want to you cynical heathen!
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1wyvpQuG01qfouyi.gif

I just can't. My dislike of religion actually pales in comparison to my hatred of Twitter :joker:

DemolitionRed 15-02-2016 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 8517049)
I just can't. My dislike of religion actually pales in comparison to my hatred of Twitter :joker:

:hehe:

Crimson Dynamo 15-02-2016 10:58 AM

The story is about twitter


Now if a tweet has perhaps say 20 negative replies a poorly paid 20 something tabloid journo can run the headline

xxxx causes outrage

or xxxx causes twitter storm


when really its just 20 people talking



"who was outraged and who are they" seems to be the easiest way to cut to the actual

Kizzy 15-02-2016 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8517111)
The story is about twitter


Now if a tweet has perhaps say 20 negative replies a poorly paid 20 something tabloid journo can run the headline

xxxx causes outrage

or xxxx causes twitter storm


when really its just 20 people talking



"who was outraged and who are they" seems to be the easiest way to cut to the actual

Are you arguing against your own point?...

Crimson Dynamo 15-02-2016 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 8517236)
Are you arguing against your own point?...

no

i did not proffer an opinion in the op, merely asked the question:smug:

Niamh. 15-02-2016 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8516930)
https://static-secure.guim.co.uk/sys...awkins-010.jpg


Church of England defends prayer tweet for Richard Dawkins after stroke


Twitter users accuse church of ‘trolling’ the famous atheist, but it insists it was wholly genuine in its concern for Dawkins’ health

http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...wkins-well.jpg

The Church’s post was retweeted more than 1000 times, with many people speculating that the concern was less than sincere.

Some commenters accused the Church of “trolling” Dawkins and suggested praying for someone who was not religious was disrespectful.

(he is ok and will make a full recovery)


______________________


shade?

Because of the retweeted prayer? :fan:

Livia 15-02-2016 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee. (Post 8516937)
Don't think it's disrespectful at all! When Samuel was ill quite a few folk asked if I would mind prayers being said for him during church services.. Although I'm not a believer, I was grateful that they would think of doing it at all .

This post says it all.

Beso 15-02-2016 06:50 PM

Bloody daft.

Pray in private, gods no got the internet ya stupid arseholes.

DemolitionRed 15-02-2016 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 8517976)
Bloody daft.

Pray in private, gods no got the internet ya stupid arseholes.

And you know this?


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.