ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums - Leaked details from May's disastrous brexit dinner with Juncker

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)

- Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)

- - Leaked details from May's disastrous brexit dinner with Juncker (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=318637)

Leaked details from May's disastrous brexit dinner with Juncker

Quote:

Leaked details from May's disastrous dinner with Juncker suggest Brexit could be far worse than anyone imagines

All of the facts have been available to British journalists writing on Brexit for months. Nothing is new. But with one or two exceptions the entire UK coverage of Brexit is written entirely from a UK-UK point of view

Europe is waking up on May Day to the most devastating document published so far on Brexit. In what appears to be an almost verbatim account of the Downing Street dinner last Wednesday in which Theresa May and David Davis broke bread with Jean-Claude Juncker and Michel Barnier, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Sunday edition details the sheer astonishment of the EU negotiators at May's position.

There is a semantic dispute on whether Brussels or Berlin planted the story but since there is zero difference between Angela Merkel (or Martin Schulz) and the Juncker-Tusk-Barnier troika, it hardly matters. London political journalists who deal daily in cynically planted leaks are hardly in a position to protest at German journalists happy to publish an account that is extremely damaging to the British Prime Minister.

The details, however, are a shock. May told Juncker that Britain did not have to pay any of the UK's outstanding bills or liabilities. She insisted all negotiations should be kept secret and was surprised when Juncker said there would have to be reports to national parliaments. If the UK left the single market and the customs union Britain would have a lower status as a "third country" than Turkey, Juncker told the Prime Minister.

May was reminded that the EU is a legal construction, not a golf club, and she was told that given the length of time it took negotiating a deal with Canada or Croatia it would be years of talks to finalise an UK-UK trade agreement.
She said that the issue of EU citizens in the UK could be settled by June. It was pointed out that this involved health care, social security issues and these were national government competences. Moreover, the UK has no list of EU citizens in Britain.

She referred to the meaningless temporary opt-outs she negotiated from EU Justice and Home Affairs measures and suggested this could be a model for Brexit with the UK opting back in on a cherry-picking basis to bits of the single market she liked.

The EU team left Downing Street in a state of shock. Juncker placed a late-night call to Angela Merkel to convey his pessimism about the lack of knowledge or understanding in Downing Street about the Brexit policy of the EU27 governments - every bit as sovereign and accountable to their voters as May is in Britain.
The next day Merkel told the Bundestag that Britain suffered from "illusions" over Brexit which produced the predictable insults from anti-EU Tories and London's mono-lingual journalists writing for the offshore press.

What is surprising is that anyone is surprised. The dominant centre-right confederation of EU conservative parties, the European People's Party, published a full page advert in the current Politico setting out Brexit negotiating priorities. These include: "EU citizens will not pay the bill for the British. EU citizens will not accept British blockades. The right order of the negotiations has to be respected" and other demands.

In visits to seven EU capitals so far this year, I have heard all of these points from senior ministers and officials responsible for Brexit talks. In Berlin I was told that the German government has been asking London for months for a list of EU citizens in the UK. There has been no reply. In Warsaw I was told that Britain had to meet its financial obligations to the EU before any exit deal could be agreed. In Lisbon I was told that despite friendship with England going back to a 14th century treaty between the two countries, Lisbon now thought in terms of the EU27 and would stay loyal to its EU partners. In Paris, I was told that the frontier would move to British territory and that customs clearing centres would be set up in all French ports to control British lorries and car and that there was no question that the $120trn City money-making machine of trading and clearing euros could stay in a non-EU or EEA country.

In Dublin the deep fear is that if the UK leaves the customs' union, there would have to be border crossing checks between Northern Ireland and Ireland with cars, vans and lorries checked for any goods that had not paid duty.

In one major EU capital, the chief Foreign Ministry Brexit negotiator told me: "We know the UK ambassador sends accurate reports of our Brexit policy to London but does anyone read them?"
All of these facts have been available to British journalists writing on Brexit for months. Nothing is new. But with one or two exceptions the entire UK coverage of Brexit is written entirely from a UK-UK point of view with the routine clichés thrown in of insulting Jean-Claude Juncker.
One cannot blame Theresa May and her mono-lingual No 10 team. Not since its 1930s coverage of Germany has the majority of the British media, including the BBC, been so poor in covering the main challenge to Britain's future in half a century.
If British citizens, businesses, inward investors and even MPs are not told any of the core publicly available facts about the position all 27 EU sovereign governments are taking on Brexit then the final outcome may be far worse than anyone imagines.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...-a7711526.html

Looks like our strong and powerful leader is out of her depth.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Leon (Post 9295513)

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...-a7711526.html

Looks like our strong and powerful leader is out of her depth.

Ah the very biased Independent. Think I will take that with a pinch of salt. :joker:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9295525)

Ah the very biased Independent. Think I will take that with a pinch of salt. :joker:

"An almost verbatim account"

wouldn't overdo it, your reaction seems salty enough as it is

The scandal! Jezza would never do such criminal activity

This is nothing new, a lot of the challenges of Brexit were made apparent before the vote but people brought into the lie that we don't need the EU but the EU needs us. People who voted with that mindset are in for a vicious wake up call.

I say bring it on, hopefully people will learn from the carnage to make informed decisions in future.

Funny how it was reported to have gone alright.
Couldn't be fake news then could it...or has been said, gossip.:joker:

It's got her rather rattled.
She wants things kept quiet and done behind closed doors probably.
The EU may have other ideas.

She terms it gossip but often gossip contains truth.
She'd rather likely keep voters in the dark as to the way things really are going or are likely to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 9295572)

Talk about counting your chickens. The outcome is two years' away - a lot can happen in that time.

Nothing wrong with the mindset of those that voted out. Time will tell about your predicted wake-up call - having to eat one's words is never very appetising. :laugh:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9295601)

http://new1.fjcdn.com/comments/Theyc...cc2930c8ec.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9295601)

Be careful, you don't want to get sand in your ears.

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 9295589)

Funny how it was reported to have gone alright.
Couldn't be fake news then could it...or has been said, gossip.:joker:

Why do you think she went back on her word and what she's being saying all along and suddenly called a snap election? She's deserpate for any form of leverage as she's obviously struggling with negotiations. Not hard to read between the lines here..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 9295572)

I wouldn't count on people learning lessons from it they'll just find a scapegoat and pass the blame onto something else, couldn't possibly be that they voted against the country's interests.

Oh look the EU are playing political games in the press. What a shock.

Hark at all the clairvoyants on here who think they can predict the future this early in the game. All these wise souls who think they are so much better informed they anyone else. There is a Long way to go yet - a lot can and will happen. Jumping on one newspaper article as though it's words are a foregone conclusion is utter hysterical nonsence. It is definitely not a foregone conclusion, just another good dose of wishful thinking and scare tactics. The remoaners repeating their never ending words of woe at every opportunity! It is a desperate attempt to unnerve those hovering and to 'encourage' them to change their vote if and when there is a referendum on the terms of the deal. Constant scare tactics from scared and angry people

Did anyone really expect it was going to be easy, that the EU were going to just roll over. They don't want Brexit and are going to do everything they can to make it difficult. They are throwing a strop and stamping their feet in protest - as was expected.

Most predictions by those doom and gloom merchants of an immediate negative effect of our economy did not materialise and our economy is still strong. I for one am not going to buy into all this negative hype from those with a clear agenda. To do so would be foolish at this stage and playing into the hands of the Remoaners. Like the rest of us you remoaners are amateurs not economists and your opinions are no more knowledgable or better informed.

Opinions, however dressed up, are opinions, nothing more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9295718)

And what makes you so optimistic, what have you heard that is so encouraging?...Or is it just your blind faith in this warmongering, corrupt shambolic govt?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chewy (Post 9295709)

I wouldn't count on people learning lessons from it they'll just find a scapegoat and pass the blame onto something else, couldn't possibly be that they voted against the country's interests.

I'd say you are absolutely right in all you say in your post.

A one sided propaganda story from a left wing remain UK rag quoting or paraphrasing from an EU rag :laugh2:

Using words like "disastrous" and "devastating":eek: :laugh:

Disastrous and devastating for the people who read the Indy and Guardian.Remainers who want either soft Brexit or no Brexit.

Talk about project fear.No wonder a section of remainers are all paranoid and anxiety filled reading stuff like that.

It basically told us absolutely nothing.It's straight up scaremongering.
It told us that the EU are going in with their starting position and so are we.It's in both sides interest to give and take and meet in the middle somewhere and both sides know this.It will be "devastating" or "disastrous" for the EU if we just tell them to feck off and leave.They want a good deal with us as much as we do.

This report was clearly leaked for a reason but its still a concern. Regardless of how we voted, we need to get to the bare bones of what’s going on.

What’s clear in May's general election campaign is, her promises are misguided and she’s a stubborn woman with little compromise. The claims she’s making in both her election campaign and Brexit are being heavily criticised by independent experts.

This is a PM who refuses debate with anyone who opposes her. At PM question time she’s seen to be contemptuous and show destain towards anyone who questions her and I think that’s a worry because it makes this report more believable.

Is the woman who isn’t willing to compromise the right person to take us forward with Brexit and is she being poorly briefed?

Lets try and look beyond "your side" "my side" squabbling because this sort of unhealthy competition just goes round in circles and gets us nowhere. We, regardless of where we sit with Brexit, want the best outcome possible and so questioning this report and questioning her capabilities is crucial, even if you are a Tory supporter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 9295756)

The thing is.....
Who would be a good leader to go into the Brexit negotiations?
Corbyn?
Farron?

As much as i don't like the Tories.Who else is there?
It needs to be someone strong and stable who can take a strong hand into the negotiations.Who can offer that from the three main parties?

Tbh i'd rather have farage go in there than any of them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 9295758)

Farage for me too. He is a great orator and not easily phased or intimidated. A confident and capable man.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9295764)

Farage for me too. He is a great orator and not easily phased or intimidated. A confident and capable man.

he comes across as arrogant and not very diplomatic to me. He's not very likeable. Doesn't seem like a good choice for someone who's trying to arrange a deal with the EU, especially after the way he carried on after the result of the vote but it's nothing to do with me :laugh:

Farage mocks and is despised by European politicians - and Brexiteers think he's the man to handle the sensitive diplomacy of setting up trade deals with those same people. ****ing bizarre. But fairly typical of the "we are big and tough and have the upper hand tee hee silly little Europe!" attitude that in fests Brexit mentality, I guess.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 9295768)

Well that's it really, if you do actually want to work with Europe and come to an agreement and get a good deal then 100% he's the wrong man for the job. If you want to go there and say "**** you Europe, you give us what ever we want or piss off, Rule Britannia" then I'm sure Farage would be perfect :laugh:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 9295771)

I have to agree.
He is the last person we need to do any negotiating, you need respect on both sides, I am afraid where he is concerned there is no love lost, never mind any respect.