Sexism in the establishment
 

Does the acceptance of sexism within the establishment filter down into society.is this why crimes against women such as rape and domestic violence are not treated with the gravitas they deserve?

There has for years been a cover up in the highest echelons of power enabling men to mistreat female employees and escape justice.

Is the 'old boys' network dead?

' Theresa May will sack Cabinet ministers if they are proven to be sex pests, the Telegraph understands, as a rapidly growing list of MPs accused of harassment circulated in Westminster.

The Prime Minister wrote to Commons Speaker John Bercow yesterday demanding tough new rules to govern MPs’ behaviour, saying the problem “cannot be tolerated any longer”.

It was claimed Conservative party staff have complied a list of 36 current Tory MPs against whom allegations of inappropriate behaviour have been made, including having affairs with junior colleagues, being "handsy" with women and using prostitutes.

Mrs May also asked the Cabinet Office to investigate the conduct of international trade minister Mark Garnier, who admitted calling his secretary “sugar t**s” and sending her to buy sex toys for him.'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...-pests-13-mps/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a8031311.html

Why do you only express enough interest in sexist attitudes when it involves the Tory government. You seem quite happy to brush aside or conveniently ignore appalling sexist attitudes by minority groups but suddenly get all fired up when it involves the Tories.

Sounds more like a Political interest and an attempt to attack May and her government than a genuine concern regarding sexist attitudes. Serious as all sexism is it seems to me that the sexism you are talking about doesn’t have as severe an impact on womens’ lives as such attitudes from certain religious groups do.

It has only come to light now... I had no part in that I asked for the opinions of others not for my opinion to be analysed as usual.
If you don't wish to comment on the thread and it's content don't.

Not sure about the affairs part of it.
If consenting adults are of legal age then it is up to them if they have affairs or not, the age difference shouldn't be an issue.

Yeah, I agree with smudgie that I don't see how "affairs" are included, as they are surely willingly partaken in by consenting adults. :shrug:

Even if it was against a policy or rule for people to engage in personal relationships with colleagues, it still isn't harassment.

Makes you laugh when some poor old sod is getting more news segments for daring to touch a womans knee while talking to her 10 odd years ago, than bex bailys rape at a labour conference and the threats of losing her job by the senior labour member she turned to if she reported it is.

"Look at all these threads about race, no one cares about sexism or attacks on women!"

*Someone makes a thread about women being harassed in the workplace*

"No no no, that's the wrong KIND of thread about women, it has to be about them being attacked by Evil Muslims blehhh or Evil Labour. I can't believe you don't care about attacks on women by minorities and labour members, disgusting."

Id like the perspective of The Truth here

but I have been denied that right by a feminatzi misogynistic conspiracy that has pervaded Tibb like a spiders web in honey

in Honey I tells ya

:fist::fist::fist:

He's here in spirit.

:fan:

In a nutshell Parmy,:smug:That says all that is wrong with society.

Bloody hell if I reported everytime a bloke put his arm around me or touched me,I would be constantly perched in a police station not forgetting all the sexual banter, as adults surely we can understand the difference between joking and real threats a lot of this is just playful and harmless,they need to concentrate on the bigger picture and the actual victims who HAVE been traumatised (like the lady who was actually raped)by real sexual harrassment,same with Hollywood,some of these people were happy to take the jobs made available by these 'sexual fiends'

Yes. That. That is "all" that is wrong with society. I'm glad to see that someone has their finger on the pulse.

Its not just about threats, though, and you're sort of highlighting the problem yourself? That people constantly put their arm round you or touch you uninvited. And I assume we're not talking about friends / family here as that's not what any of this is about... No one is saying friends can't put their arm round someone.

But anyway; you're saying that it happens a lot, and it doesn't bother you. Which is fine, everyone is different. But some people are not comfortable at all being touched by strangers or having an arm put round them? I mean... I personally don't like it at all, and I'm a 6'2 200lb+ man. It's not about feeling "threatened" - I just plain don't like it - and people should have enough respect for others to not feel entitled to start touching strangers in a familiar way without permission.

There are certain guys out there who believe that they are entitled to, that is is "normal" to, put their arm around whoever they want / touch a leg / whatever... But it really isn't?

I was reffering to Parmys post about the lack of news about something far more important and sinister than someone touching a leg.Society needs to wake up and deal with the important things in life.obviously there are plenty of other things wrong in the world,I was answering what Parmy touched on.

But are fellow employees strangers?

There are also women who do this?

If i get banned for touching:fist:

:joker: I was going to add how very dare you,but thought,better not :laugh:

Id like to see what evidence is brought forward

It is a strange one though cause obviously if a stranger walks up and puts an arm round you your going to worry as a woman and check your wallet as a man.

But i see my work colleagues as mates, we socialise and laugh and joke together. Maybe im lucky, but if i put my arm round one of the girls they would know i was reasuring them.

Bbc news did pick up on that last night on the ten o clock..something about tm seeing fresh evidence.

Like you suspect though, there is nothing like a cabinet reshuffle to grab the headlines.:hee:

It’s a culture in the house and elsewhere Brillo but because its in the house it can’t and shouldn’t be trivialized. I’m sure this goes on across all parties but those parties aren’t in power, the Tories are. I think May is doing her damage limitation by having these accusations properly aired and dealt with. Unfortunately, though, I think the only thing that will be remembered is the ‘sex toy’ scandal.

Its all about charm and looks. If an attractive charming colleague touches your leg or puts arm around its ok , if the creepy guy with oily hair does it its not

No but they're also not necessarily "friends", and I think most people have a good sense of who they have an actual friendship with, and who they only know in a work capacity.

Its pretty much general knowledge that it's not appropriate to be over-familiar with work colleagues, especially subordinates, who are not also an out-of-work friend surely? And it's that way for a good reason, e.g. People will play along or pretend not to be uncomfortable with something if it's a superior, out of fear of losing their job or being otherwise penalised in some way (e.g. Being given a tonne of extra work, or all of the crappy menial tasks) which does also happen.

I have zero sympathy for anyone who breaks this "rule"... Like I said, it's standard workplace etiquette? If they choose to ignore it and lose their job... That's their own choice? If they start claiming that they "didn't know it was inappropriate" then they should probably lose their job anyway, because they are stupid, incompetent, and not suitable to be in charge of employees.