Lord Levy in the Clear
 

Lord Levy zionist-jew got away with paying tony blair for favours.

HOW COULD HE HAVE GOT AWAY WITH IT? he got caught and now hes in the clear?????

*democracy for civilians is a technique to hide what goes on every where else.

Who knows Rex, I htink that whenever politicians are involved they tend to get away with their corrupt behaviour which seems so unfair as we you can be sure would have faced the full wrath of the law.

yeah but this shouldn't be the case of "oh its the weasely politicians again", i mean does any body know what favours they could have been.

for example:

Lord Levy was Blairs man for the Middle east, Levy is a zionist-Jew, could he have paid Tony Blair party to go to war with Iraq to stop Saddam from Waging war against the zionist regime of Israel.

The fact that he is Jewish is not relevant to the Cash-for-honours affair.

zionist-jew is considered as one word, i did not say Jewish

Still not relevant to the Cash-for-honours business.

*huff* he was Blairs envoy to the middle east and Israel is in the middle east.

There is a relevance that he is a Zionist (Pro-Israel) where biasm within Blairs policy towards the ME, would be caused becuase someone was paying him to be...............................................

maybe if i said blairs envoy was a Palestinian, then that wouldn't be so insensative.

Everyone involved in the Cash-for-honours scandal got away with it, no surprise there then.

He got away with it because the political elite in this country closed ranks, and covered up the whole disgraceful and shameful mess.

Not because he was a jew or a zionist or anything else you want to call him, except "connected".

Corrupution in this country is endemic, we live in a country where it is a simple truth and a plain fact of life that some people are above the law and treat differently from Joe Public.


No, just equally as wrong as your reasoning why Levy got away with it

why do you think he got away then?????????????

he was caught red handed?

He didn't get away with it persay, as we all know it happened. However, it was clearly a government cover-up to stop further investigations into more claims and presenting the government as the big mess it is.

They were all caught red-handed and thats why he got away with it, not because he is jewish.

We have a ruling elite in this country who are above the law, there are intertwined links between our "rulers" and one or two media owners who essentially control this country's news and are able to manipulate the plebs [you, me and joe public].

There are a few bastions of a free press, but marginalised and scattered.

With all due respect this zionist conspiracy malarkey is just another form of control, to let people go off on wild tangets and then they can be easily made to look foolish.

The real power lies in a few families, their cronies and enforcers, and major corporations.

Fear is the key, keep the populace frightened, the boogey
man won't work, so we have things like the zionist conspiracy, "the war on terror", all replacing "reds under the beds". One way or another for the comtrol to work we have to be frightened

Am I saying a "zionist conspiracy" doesn't exist - no, I am saying the actual movement is tiny - but has been allowed to gain a massive, almost mythic status because of a series of false flag ops.

Black Ops and false flags are now endemic, creations of our "leaders" to frighten the population into meek subjugation, like a scolding parent "Only we can protect you"

We have a new McCarthyism, designed to instill fear in us.

That the only important factor is the money to be made, that the likes of you and I are expected to die for, and that they never ever get caught out.

those that speak out and look like they will be listened to, ALL go the same way. JFK, RFK, MLK, the list goes on.

Forget the zionist conspiracy, forget religion and look the major corporations and ties to our "leaders" for the real power brokers and criminals.

They and their sons don't fight in wars - they start them and they profit from them, and only in exceptional circumetances are any of them sacrificed on the alter of law, when they do something so breathtakingly crass - it can't be brushed away - and if its really really bad - well, people die everyday, and in circumstances such as those exceptional ones, usually just before they go to prison.

Keith Vaz has been getting away with it for years. Is he a Zionist Jew too?

getting away with incouraging war? incouraging sales of weapons and guns in the ME?

So as long as it does not involve the middle east then they can get away with stuff and not be Zionist Jews?

WTF! for 1 minute stop thinking of the concept of BIASM, kieth vaz isnt involved in thousands DIEING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Neither is Levy - unless you are attempting to claim that ALL jews have blood on their hands

LOL! Surely there must've been a synopsis of a Jeffrey Archer novel that's set in England you could've cut & pasted instead?

LOL! Surely theres something original you could have cut and pasted instead ?

You question originality when the majority of your own post ranges from 40+ to almost 60 years out of date? :joker:

Would you care to expand your reasoning, care to explain your comment, care to state your position - or should we just put it down to another ad hominem flame ?

The 'reasoning' is blatantly obvious. The position is that the post in question is a mishmash of tired conspiracy theories and archaic US political issues, severely lacking direction. And in the context of this thread, completely irrelevant.

DID I SAY ALL JEWS? NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post edited - Please don't insult other users it is against the TiBB rules - Red

Do ALL ZIONIST Jews have blood on their hands?

is this anything like your claim that

Easily provable to be false, yet initially you based your zionist jew theory on that [false] claim, you quickly dropped it of course when the truth was pointed out to you.

So, are you now talking in the kind of absolutes you were when you made the claim of the majority of the the worlds jews living in Isreal as proof for your zionist theories, or will you again drop the subject when facts get in the way of your argument ?