Why are everyone ganging up on siavash WTF?
 

does charlie really think this is going to help him win the final? and rodrigo what a two faced p****

Rodrigo has always been part of Lisas group :mad:

I think Siavash hasnt nominated and got them all up for eviction again LOL

:joker:

Charlie to go :elephant:

i dnt like charlie but i agree with him siavash is trying to save his own skin

I knew theyd make Siavash the scapegoat. I could see it coming.


vvankers.

They can't all be up this week, didn't you see the twist BB made ...

And Charlie is not up this week. Siav/Marcus/David are in the mix, that's it.

No Siavash makes himself the scapegoat by not nominating normally every week. That's his own fault. He's the one tampering with stuff each week.

It's Charlie.

He's bringing up **** like Siavash being a horrible person because he went with Noirin when he knew that Marcus liked her and **** like that.

He's in his elelment because he's never liked Siavash and now has the chance to fully do a hatchet job on him, and he's going round dragging it all up with the other HM's.

Sophie to give her some credit, isn't having any of it, so she obviously has SOME loyalty to her friends.

Looks like as i predicted 2 weeks ago Marcus v's Siavash, vash hasn't nominated, so he has put himself up....Marcus 5 votes so thats a defo..Siavash 4.... David 3 i think... so by not Nominating David Siavash has shot himself & Marcus in the foot.....fu@**ng game player. Vote Siavash out.:cloud:

I think that's exactly what happened, 5, 4 and 3. Siavash shot himself in the foot by not nominating David. Now he's upset and arguing with Charlie.

Siavash would only argue if the noms didn't go his way. :rolleyes:

it was sophie that brought up the noirin thing. charlie said marcus has sussed him and sophie said he's only saying that coz of noirin. rodrigo and charlie disagreed with her

Charlie is the messenger. All that whispering.

If anyone refuses to give a nomination, Sophie and Charlie get a nomination.

If anyone refuses to give a nomination, Sophie and Charlie get a nomination. [/quote]
Yes and it seems that Siavash has shot himself in the foot by not nominating David (or anyone). It seems like Marcus = 5, Vash = 4, David = 3.

Funny how all his silly games backfired, and now he's crying in the bedroom, ROFL. :spin2:

agree if thats they way it plays out sia deserves to go

Lisa must be glad at the moment if all this is true.

Because of Siavash everything went as she planned and even her henceman survived. Jesus!

:shocked:

You're right... its Si, Marcus and David... Siavash just said it :sad:

Worst case scenario for me... my two faves up :(

marcus breaking rules at any given moment is fine yet siavash makes a decision to not nominate and people have an issue? he has every right to nominate or not nominate,no one minded when marcus said the same thing last week or have we forgotten that?marcus saying he might not nominate and i dont remember charlie kicking up a fuss then...

siavash is being made a scapegoat because they not he cant defend himself aswell as marcus could,imagine charlie having a go at marcus last week?he'd have been man handled and he knows it.. it was good to see sophie backing siavash even when rodney was trying to guilt trip her..

there is a list

Maybe not even David, that's just Vash's opinion. He doesn't know who Rodrigo voted for.

It might just be Vash vs Marcus.

Well said :thumbs:

Siavash is the one stirring things up. He has messed up .

Pretty damn obvious to anyone not clouded by immense bias. Sadly a minority on here.

Siavash just hasnt the balls to go up one on one with another hm.His obsessive fans need to wake up.

This. This thread is a joke. ROFL @ ganging up, this whole ordeal = Siavash's obsession.

:thumbs:

forgive me,but lets just say he has the balls and wants to go up against another H.M because he thinks he could survive,would that not be seen as tactical voting and game playing?all he has said is he did not want to vote,why is this such an issue for people?

he is not the first house mate to ever decide to not nominate,yet he is the one getting singled out..strange that.. and those saying siavash just talks about nominations and what not all the time,do they not remember when lisa would sit around with karly and anyone who would listen,and poison people against each other?also did freddie and marcus not do much the same when they had their little clique?yet siavash is in the wrong for breaking one measely rule..

For breaking one measely rule about four times! If he gave a reason for not doing it people might understand but nominating is the fundamental rule in big brother, everybody has had to do it except this douche apparently.

I think siavash defended himself pretty well, marcus was made a scapegoat 2 weeks ago when everyone was up.

:bored:
And you jealous haters need to change the record

I've given up trying to give my opinion on the reasons why Siavash is doing what he's doing, because people don't listen.
If they would actually listen to what he's saying, they might get it, but they won't so I can't be bothered explaining either.

I think I should just give up too.
The funny thing is some FMs are making it out like Siavash is so sh*t scared of being up for eviction, but you see him on live feed and he's just cool about it all- hes like 'whatever happens happens, I did what I thought was right'

Doesnt look like someone scared to me

siavash has been scared to death to be up with just one person and thats why he has for 3 weeks cocked up the noms for his own benefit..he has wanted everyone up so he has a better chance of staying..he states he doesnt want a free ride...well hell all he has had to do was tell the housemates to put him up and he wouldnt get a free ride...the man has no balls..i just hope its him and marcus this week...i want to see him tremble,pray and shake like he does every week when noms are read out and when the name of the evictee is read out.

Siavash......not playing the game, taking himself outta the game = no £100k then...simple as.

hes a grown man,why should he need to give a full and frank reason for anything?marcus vandalised the diary room,he broke rules every minute,people on here go "oh that marcus,hes so boystrous hes a legend" yet siavash decides to not nominate (for his own reasons) and people seem to want to pick a fight with him..

fundamental rules are broken all the time on big brother,if they were always adhered to i dont think this show would be half as amusing,my point is,siavash is doing what he feels is right,marcus/sophie had made much the same point to not nominate last week.. so why is this an issue?

if it was about breaking rules constantly then i dont see why marcus is held in such high regard when he has broken way more rules then siavash ever has,if its about game playing then i still dont see why marcus is held in such high regard when he says "the only reason i do some things,is i want to be seen as the housemate who's done it all" is that not a game plan?

further more when charlie wrote on the fridge was that not a breach of the rules?they all do it,so siavash should be left to make his own decisions and not be chastised for doing so,just like every other housemate in there..

well no charlie didnt kick up a fuss with marcus then did he?he just accepted it and went about his business..its a shame he did not give siavash the same treatment this time round..

If he were a grown man he would grow a pair and just vote, I'm not condoning Marcus but you seem to just side with whoever is getting slated on here just to be different? Oh and nobody felt the need to talk about Charlie writing on the fridge as we all know he's a tool anyway.

THE VASH TO WIN. :thumbs:

:hug: :thumbs:

what you see as being diffrent is nothing more then me thinking logically and not jumping on foolish bandwagons to stay with the "in" crowd on a forum..

if i thought siavash was wrong i wouldv'e said so,you think to be a grown man means to just vote,while i think to be a grown man is to think for himself and stand up for what he feels is right,and not just follow the crowd so yeah thats where we differ,had he just caved in because he was being singled out then i think one could say siavash should indeed "grow a pair" however,hes standing firm and hopefully this week,it will become clear if siavash stays,that he should not be victimised and targeted in such a way,for excercising his right to not vote..

i doubt id be seeing posts from you about marcus needing to "grow a pair" had he chosen not to vote,infact im sure he would be regarded as even more of a legend for disobeying rules like the badass he is..