BBC reporter Ray Gosling told viewers how he killed his Ill Gay Lover
 

It first went out
on BBC Inside Out regional North West.
Then he went on BBC Breakfast National news.


He put a pillow over his lover who was in hospital in pain with Aids.


He is a fool
now talking Live on SkyNews,
from a Nottingham Pub , outside it.

Kay Burley told him
he has broken the law.


The BBC need to sack him.
The Police are now looking into this.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/...23_233x423.jpg
He is 70years old now
this was in 2002.
No Idea if he killed that cat.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...gay-lover.html

The BBC Clip is on this link .

Sounds like something done out of compassion - not malice! Maybe he was begged by his partner to do so - although how anyone could ask a loved one to do that - knowing the potential consequences for them is beyond me!

Yes sounds like it.
But the BBC bosses had no Idea he was going to leak this.


This reflects on the BBC
Stuff a Pillow on your lovers face -as told on BBC Inside Out.

Shown at 7:30PM.

He is not of a Sound Mind
talking on BBC Breakfast and SkyNews.

killing is killing. he has No right to be God.

But someone has the right to decide if they want to end their own life - and if they ask someone to end it for them, because they can't - that is their choice! It could be argued that those that carry out such a request, do so at great risk to themselves - and therefore show enormous compassion and selflessness!

:joker::joker::joker::joker: epic


on the serious note its the whole debate of Euthanasia again which im on the fence when it comes to it......

...this is how it started with

abortion

divorce



and look where we are now

He says in Heaven his Lover is looking down on him
on SkyNews.


He is Not of a Sound Mind.
Now in a Pub on BBC Public pay.

No it is against Our Laws.

Laws aren't always right - and can be changed!

he is not looking down on anyone.

only in the last day, when Jesus returns to earth will the physical bodies of believers be raised to heaven according to the Bible

Its non-biblical nonsense

best to avoid murder until that time

He is Funded with BBC Public Money.


The Bloated BBC has lost all its standards
this is proof.
No Executive at the BBC
was aware he was going to tell about this Murder he did.
They would have edited it out.

This one Law in the UK
will never change.

:shocked:

Sweet jesus....

Compassion 'mercy killing' they say?
Well I wonder what the murder victim has to say about that?
Oh right.. he killed him.

One of the reasons we have murder trials is to try and determine these things. You don't get to commit homicide and later tell people it doesn't need to be investigated.. after all you are a reporter so... just believe me.

My guess is.. he was getting older and really wanted to sodomize as many young men as possible. Get high and slutty in the gay clubs or whatever the scene.
This guy was holding him back.
Sure.. he was getting almost saint-like glorious status from 'helping his dying lover' and got a lot out of that,
but,
All that back patting, high status, praises was also why he could not do other guys.
He wanted his partner dead.
Collect on it.
Get it over with.
Then get to those drug parties and reckless sex.

Maybe?
Cops have these 'instincts' right off the top. a 'hunch'. the gut feeling.

Hope your not on the jury then - talk about preconceptions! :shocked:

this is what the cops have to think however

Tell the Bloated BBC that
we are paying for this bloke
to get drunk in the Pub he is in.

This was the Fool Live on SkyNews
not long ago.

Click Play.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...r_Who_Had_Aids

He calls the lad he killed his Bit On The Side.
This edit is 45seconds long.

You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.

I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?

I don't think that - but I think that everything points to it being a mercy killing. Of course it would have to be investigated - but I think my view is far more likely than yours!

"he was not my partner he was my bit on the side"

wtf

"he was in terrible pain"

is this guy a doctor?

this beggars belief

But you are Not Permitted to Use the Bloated BBC
for this Death Platform.


This Reflects on the BBC.

He is Live on Ch4 News now

He is Not of a Sound Mind at all.
he just said we have Laws of The Heart up here in Nottingham.

He is a Nutter
just because he thinks he did the best thing
does not make This Legal.
He does not want the Law Changed,
he just wants to get away with his own Murder.

The BBC need to sack him fast.

You have to look at it this way - he is seen as a real authentic advocate for gay rights and this 'young man' who he was with (and may have given AIDS?) is dying slowly.
Maybe TOO slowly for Goslings liking.
Gosling simply cannot leave him. It would ruin his reputation and career.
How long might this young man have lived?
Possibly another year or more?
This is a full year where Gosling is, in effect, not allowed any more young 'bottoms', absolutely no orgies or 'glory holes' as the gays say it.
MAYBE he can have anonymous gay sex in some public park toilets.. but even that is risky and would look worse if caught cheating that way.
So?
Snuff the life out of this young man, collect all the praises and get massive credibility for gay rights, AIDS orgs and of course for 'staying by his side to the end',
and,
a few weeks later its back to the coke-filled toilet sex with new non-infected young men.

The cops better get on this now and start asking some tough questions.
I assume that Gosling will immediately cry 'Gay-bashing' at being questioned and quickly try and turn this around as himself being 'victimized by homophobics',
but,
the cops simply have to ignore that and investigate and question him no differently than if he was a skinhead or upper class mother or uni student.. all the same and no different.

This is the problem with this insidious new liberal craze

He has now Been Arrested by Police.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ring-Aids.html


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/...52_468x346.jpg
The BBC North Inside Out docu'
and he broke BBC rules.

Some have him hung, drawn and quatered without even knowing all the facts! Innocent until proven guilty - is that an expression that some on here are not at all familiar with!

The BBC need to Sack him now.

this guy is a murderer.

Your probably right our MP's are more interested in passing laws to slaughter the unborn than passing laws to save from suffering.......

I have a lot of sympathy for those that might assist a willing person who has had enough and wants to end it.......

This radio guy however refers to him as a bit on the side.......No proof that the victim wanted his life ended........

Under such circumstances he has laid himself wide open to be charged with murder and to serve a long jail sentence........

Latest news this morning is that he has been arrested.........

Just Reported on Ch4 News Live

The Bloated BBC that made that Docu'
has not handed the Police the Video of him saying how he killed
his (Bit On The Side) younger lover.

The Poxy BBC say the Police must get a Court Order.


The BBC Executive of this show
should be removed
for not knowing what was going to be shown.

Wow. I agree with WOMBAI.

No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.

So are you against healthcare as a whole? After all, isn't that playing God too?

BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!