99% of Modern Art and Poetry is crap
 

or would you put the percentage higher?

Lower lower.











Just remember you dont get anything for a pair, not in this game.

The bih hoo haa at the Tate this Month!
 

http://www.askart.com/AskART/photos/...16_3813/49.jpg

http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/GorkyMoth.jpg

If you don't enjoy it then have a nice gander at a boring painting of a bowl of fruit then.

If you enjoy the bore-fest that is Lost I am sorry but cannot take your suggestion seriously regarding still life alternatives.

Gorky's Mother by Arshile Gorky innit, painted in the 1930's, an Iconic armenian artist.


If it aint to your taste dont buy it leather.

art is what you make it.

can you explain what you mean?

a Greek man pissing on a fig roll is not art is it?

Nice that you have to pick at something else completley irrelevant to try put me down. Brilliant.

I passed on the Emperors new trousers too. sorry you lost out.

I try to please.


and Lost is still crap.

that is your opinoin on a piece of art you have made that yourself.

I didnt say I liked it, thing is art is in the eye of the beholder. If you dont like it dont buy into it. There are good works of art and there are some dross. For example didnt buy into Emin's or a lot off Hirsts stuff. Sometimes its to make an underlying point or statement as opposed to being pleasing to the eye.

By that definition then anything is art and thus art ceases to be something or anything?

Depends who is Doing it.

The guy needed a leak and i had the biscuit, what can you do. Its art innit?

You owe me £10

you owe me time you dick it's like typing to a wall with learning problems.****.

roflmao

Hey, Art is subjective and while I find certain new exhibits distasteful I still enjoy viewing them and exploring the emotional and intellectual reactions they elicit from me. Art at it's best should stimulate you in many different ways depending on the piece in question.

Do I think some are crap? Yes. Do I still think there's value in them? Absolutely. Creativity is an essential component of human nature and we learn so much about ourselves from viewing works from our past and present.

http://lesspainbetterlife.com/blog/u...ammer_nail.jpg

PING. We have a winner.

Bankys Film
in his own Warren Type Cinema set up in London.
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/...sy-fil-001.jpg

is correct

99% crap

1% beautiful

"hammer and nail"

at the tate Modern

programmes £15

£20 to get in

I never said that and trust you to reduce my comments to a rallying call for your own sentiments. You're quite boring at times LT.

luckily less times than you are sanctimonious eh?

Forget it LT. Seriously, you're not worth it.

that is not art that is just a fun idea and actually quite difficult to park on

see^^

:joker:

at least this is free

It is to me. What is your definition of art?

You're trying to incite me into a reaction here and it's simply not going to work. Continue posting inane little comments if you want but I stupidly enough thought there may have been an opportunity to engage in some interesting discourse here: unfortunately for me I didn't look to see who had opened the thread at the time.

What do you consider to be good art, then?

and still you continue..

it is almost a form of art


and btw "interesting discourse"?

its not my birthday is it?

I find it all attractive to look at.

"Art is a collaboration between God an the artist, and the less the artist does the better. "

Andre Gide

Nah, the final curtain would have been drawn long ago on your little act if it were art.

Interesting discourse might happen when you hit 12. Not there yet.

That's not your definition, it's a generic quote containing an entirely abstract definition that was made more to sound nice than offer up a technical definition of what art is. But whatever, I'll play you at your own game :

So on what grounds is the picture in question not art then? Was there no collaboration between god and the artist on that one? How do you know this?