Lesbian couple kicked out of a Chruch shocker
 

They were kicked out for looking like stereotypical lesbians, the ones that folks tell you dont exist. That and being f'ing annoying.

read more.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ands-pews.html

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH omg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/...60_468x311.jpg

your avatar looks like their lovechild!

Give them a break so what they held hands.

the woman is married and has a family

had it been with a man the congregation would have felt the same

but she's going through a divorce, however long it takes is out of her hands in some respect. people get new partners while going through divorce all the time she's not marrying this woman so there's no need for a fuss.

She separated from her husband last September and is now going through a divorce.

She began a relationship with Miss Lawrence , 31, last November

- she is NOW going through a divorce

she is at it.

maybe they had an argument because one of them took the other one up the aisle.

:hugesmile:

Neither of them were willing to get on their knees.

I think it's pretty pathetic that people are even laughing at this. I agree totally with Ross.

How "Christian"

The woman is going through a divorce! I wonder if her ex-husband's relationships are scrutinised in the same way!

I was thinking the same thing when reading it, i doubt it very much:mad::rolleyes:

How dare they. Evil homos.

True this :hugesmile:

Firstly i'm shocked that the Daily Mail and their readers comments seem to be positive towards this couple. I've noticed the Daily Mail have been losing their touch the last week or so
Secondly this is why I hate religion so much. The church thinks it can tell people how to act well it should piss off because in our society the individual comes above this outdated organisation which is built upon a foundation of lies.
They should join the catholic church, I hear you can hold hands with anyone there, even children..

Stupid lesbians.

38 and 31? They look well into their 40s :shocked:

Lesbianism ages you.

Relationships age you fullstop! Being single and pleasing yourself has a lot going for it!

No life ages you, while masturbation has a lot going for it, it really is not the answer.

Is it only me that thinks this sounds very dirty?! :p

But yeah...thats very true...relationships are ridiculously stressful :S



And as for the OP...ridiculous. But typical of religious nuts.

Vicky you really have a dirty filthy mind!!!!

OMG - I shall have to re-phrase - I didn't mean it that way! You have one dirty mind there girl!

:o

I would say life, relationships and masturbation age you! :hugesmile:

True but while a celibate life with no one in it to share the joys and the woes may not exactly help you live forever, it will certainly seem it.

Swings and roundabouts I guess - but I seem to remember some studies that concluded that married men were less stressed than single ones - but the opposite applied for women! I can see why!

Yeah true, but then again there are other studies that conclude the exact opposite often borne out by the fact married men die earlier than married women or single men.

Is it even worth posting?

The latest in a series of LT's 'look!, homos aint perfect!'.

People seem to forget that Churches are their own 'private' organisations. They can make their own rules and decide what they want happening or don't want.
Annoying lesbians trying to make some kind of 'stand' against the Church is really... well annoying.
So I can understand why the Church asked them to leave.

I'm not sure it's 'overtly sexual' but then again as lesbians their hands would be their version of penises. So in that sense it was like they were rubbing their wieners together.

What stand are the women actually making, oh yes thats right the right to worship the god they believe in, in a church they find convenient or like.

Yeah it must be so sickening to see two women holding hands, which are substitiute penises eh?

Doesnt the same absurd argument hold when in a heterosexual relationship if for example maybe the man cant get an erection or the woman finds intercourse painful.

Maybe they should just ban everyone in the congregation from holding hands, in fact whhy stop there why not ban any form of human contact during the services , you never know what sort of venal thoughts skin to skin contact can bring on in some sinners.

Ask yourself how the local Gay nightclub would react to a couple of Christians singing some hymns at the bar each week?

these 2 silly women were making a fool of themselves and deserve to be chucked out.

I feel very sorry for her children

They would probably just ignore them or laugh at them, gays tend to be a lot more tolerant of people than the average christian community.

Yes so surely a quiet word asking them to refrain from all the lovey dovey stuff in church as it may offend others probably would have been the best course of action. The at least that church could have defended itself by saying they had followed every conceivable option that allowed them to stay as members.

Yeah any publicity that opens children up to be picked on is quite bad, maybe all parties concerned should have thought about the ramifications of their actions before deciding on their particular course of action.

No they do not have this right. The Church has the right to accept or reject members.
They are private orgs.

I don't get to join the Montreal Canadians ice hockey team and then decide I like to shoot on my own teams net or remove my helmet and they must accept it.
Thats a private club with their own rules. They can make me leave.

Not sickening but just awkward and unappealing. I have seen Japanese girls rubbing their boobs together and thought it had a certain artistic beauty in its own way.

No. Using your comparison we would suppose the lesbians were still touching their (version or equivalent) of penises. If they got hand arthritis (or some hand impairment) and had to play 'footsies' - then that would be like the husbands hand.
Obviously.
Uh no.
No need to do that. You allow hand shakes. Some allow hugging (the side-hug being a sort of christian specialty),
and,
they may allow married couples to hold hands.
They just 'ban' gay contact.
A lot of Churches would not allow any gays together in their Church regardless of any touching.
It's their right and its because they consider it against their religion.

The problem is they are not without contradiction. You say they have a right to allow or reject who they want, right, but what about 'Judge Not'?

Just not very Christian, IMO.

So just to be clear here - you think there is a Christian 'rule' and it says 'Judge Not'?

And how would that work anyways? Like if a bunch of scallies were throwing brick through the windows the Christians may WISH to say something about it but you come along and AHA.. hhaah... 'Judge not!'.

How would anyone even live?
If a contractor over-charged them 2 billion pounds they would 'judge not'?
I take money from the collection plate but before they can say anything aha... 'Judge not'.

Or is it possible you don't know what your talking about?
I think that would be the better explanation for your 'contradiction'.
Yes, I am pretty sure they DONT work that way or have that rule.

Well I mean it's not like they're born again Christians, they've been attending mass their whole life, they know how the Catholic church feels about gays, they knew what to expect and they still decided to risk it.

Yeah I seem to recall a tale from the good book where Jesus stepped in on a stepping and said something along the lines of "Let he is without sin cast the first stone". John chap 8:7 Its generally taken to mean Judge not lest you be judged on your own failings. Unless of course you know better than a whole ****load of theologians

(What the NT didnt tell us was that jesus got twatted in the head by a stone then looked up and said Mother you *******ing bitch!)