Govan's out and you were surprised??
 

If it took you this long to be 'outraged' that Govan was evicted, then shame on you.

Anyone with half a brain would have realised just how stupid the voters were after Victor left during BB 2004. Before him, there weren't any truly iconic housemates, and contestants of his calibre fell down the same slope he did: as the voters didn't (and don't) appreciate good housemates.

When Science lost out to the public vote against Orlaith, that should have made the BB production team wise up and they should have eradicated the eviction process.

The fact they didn't is pitiful.

And anyone here who is truly 'outraged' that Govan has gone hasn't done their homework nor understands human psychology. Pathetic.

Btw, here's the solution to this problem. Easy to implement and would have saved the show if utilised back in 2004: http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=143250

Not at all he deserved to go.

Another stupid, ill thought out answer. Yawn.

Reply again when you've woken up and actually read this OP. :nono:

This thread is so important and yet no one even reads it. Disgusting.

your just attention seeking now, you have made 3 threads on the same subject, and you need to face facts, i dont give a **** how 'entertaining' he is (hes not btw), he is a horrible person and deserved to be evicted

god your really getting on my nerves 'this thread is so important' :joker::joker:

Stupid in your opinion because you're been stubborn that a HM you liked has gone. :sleep:

Like I told the other moron in the other thread, this is bigger than just Govan leaving. The fact you can't understand that is shameful.

It's a bigger concept than that mcmoron.

i dont want to punch you in the face and scratch your eyes out (its opposite day btw)

why dont you explain then instead of just coming back with lame insults, Govan went because he was an idiot and obviously 72% of the public didnt want him in there. Get over it.

:joker::joker:

Its what most of the people are doing tonight now that govans gone and can't come back with a good arguement, just adding the odd 'sheep' or 'idiot' or 'fool' comment lol

I did explain, both in this OP and here: http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=143250

**** me dont ask it to explain further we'll end up with another 7 threads on the same subject

I'm waiting for an intelligent reply. Yours is pitiful and you are a disgrace to TiBB. You should put a dunce image in your avatar and quit making posts in recognition of this fact.

i dont need to make an intelligent reply, im better than you thats all you need to know

Indeed. But let's not blame the morons entirely, this is also the fault of the BB production team, who have ZERO knowledge of human psychology and how idiots vote.

Yes you do. Your posts are cringeworthy to read and bring down the tone of the forum.

Then you haven't been reading my OP's (before I got into arguments).

Also, look at the replies to my OP's: they are dimwitted. The fact you aren't siding with me (yet give the impression of someone who has some degree of intelligence) is shameful imo.

I'm pretty sure an 'intelligent' reply would go straight over his head anyway. As you correctly stated, hes gone, because he was horrible. He might not be a horrible person, but he certainly came across as one in the house.. hence why 72% of people voted for him.

Theoretically, for every 7 of us normal people who think people like Govan (who are only entertaining due to the fact they are so mean to/about others) should be evicted, there are going to be 3 other morons (like the person who started this thread) trying to defend him.

Its nice that you think so highly of yourself, dont come onto a forum voice your opinions and then when people disagree act like you know best and where the idiots.

You fail to see the bigger picture, which has already been explain in this OP and over here: http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=143250

This is pitiful and you should be ashamed.

My proposal would have ensured BB stayed entertaining. I'd even go as far to say if the production team had utilised it back in 2004, BB would still be comissioned for more shows. The fact it is being cancelled is disgraceful and shows a complete lack of knowledge on the production team's behalf.

But your idea of no evictions is crap.

1. The show would never end
2. People would never change
3. Friendship groups will never/rarely change
4. Less interaction between different housemates

Personally I like seeing controversial characters evicted, since it is fun to watch 'friends' of evictees try to socialise with people who they constantly bitched about etc. Do you not think it would be more interesting to watch someone like Keeva (for example) trying to mingle with the; Sunshine, JJ, Mario, Dave, Ben group, than it would be to watch the same people, bitching about the same people, over and over and over and.....

Victor deserved his eviction in week 8, despite being an influential housemate. He behaved incredibly out of order that week and bitched about Shell for ages in the hope that it would make her snap. Lets put it this way, he couldn't even survive against Jason in that eviction.

It would. It would come to a natural end about 10 weeks in, which would leave about 2 weeks for evictions (but with vote to save to give the entertaining ones half a chance).

You don't know that since there hasn't been a whole series dedicated to what I'm proposing.


See 2.

Unfounded.

A stupid analysis.

If you give the HM's punishments on Friday, the BB production team could conjure up all sorts of nasty ways to get the housemates arguing/falling out. The possibilities would be endless and the entertainment value x10 better.

patty nobody agrees with you

You thought Victor should have been evicted? Yet he was the best housemate in there and arguably the best of all time?? Shameful!

See your other thread, in posted in that. What YOU want out of BB, differs to what the MAJORITY wants. 70% of people do not want to see bitching and arguing. 30% do.

70% of people might vote for BNP, it doesn't make you wrong for disliking them, nor does it make you wrong for complaining about them, but that is how democracy works. Its about trying to please the majority. Look at it from BB's point of view - 5,000,000 viewers.. would they rather please 3,500,000 of them, or 1,500,000.

What a stupid analogy lol :joker:

My proposal wasn't even voted on, so comparing it to tonights eviction is nonesense!

As for the BNP, how can you even imply the majority would vote them in any real numbers considering they don't even come close to even the Lib Dems (who are seen as a joke by most lol).

I didn't want to say Conservs, Libdem or Lab because I didn't want to start a politics war over '70% of people would never vote labour' or something like that. :joker: .

It is meant generally - 70% of people may vote for 'x' (I used BNP just to make things seem more logical, but feel free to use whatever you like).. it doesn't mean you are wrong about 'x', its doesn't neccesarily mean 'x' is best or even right, but it was a majority decision. Govan was a front runner for the 'bitching party' in the eviction 'election' and he didn't win.

No1curs

i gotta quit goin on this board during eviction night. completely spoiledddd :(

This thread isn't important in the slightest. It will fall down like any other thread, and get forgotten like any other thread.

No not surprised at all.

Wow, Patty178 is a complete tool!

I should be careful if I were you. Insulting other Forum members is against the rules. Continue like this and I will report you