ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB11 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=551)
-   -   What is John James' issue with Rachael? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157030)

eye sea 20-08-2010 10:35 AM

What is John James' issue with Rachael?
 
I thought his behaviour towards Rachael was disgusting.

I think she did well to stop herself from spitting on John James' back, never mind massage it.

I think the truth is he really wanted her, but he feared she'd knock him back. That's why the hate.

karezza 20-08-2010 10:37 AM

Rachel is an idiot. Her romance with Nathan is fake. She was horrible to Sunshine.

Jordan. 20-08-2010 10:39 AM

He thinks she was only on the show for the fame yet he is the one who flew right over here just to be on and then says he doesnt give a **** about the show, makes you question what he wants out of it then....

Sunday 20-08-2010 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eye sea (Post 3687772)
I thought his behaviour towards Rachael was disgusting.

I think she did well to stop herself from spitting on John James' back, never mind massage it.

I think the truth is he really wanted her, but he feared she'd knock him back. That's why the hate.


He doesnt like girls that are up their own backside and she kept giving him that snarly look.:hugesmile:

CaudleHalbard 20-08-2010 10:47 AM

John James has a problem with non-white females, methinks. Well all females really ;) - but particularly those who are not of the same ethnicity as him.

Not to excuse that, but it is part of his Aussie background - the "Abos", as they call their indigenous people, have not been well-treated, historically.

For an Aussie man to have a non-white g/f is probably social death. Perhaps any Aussies on here would like to confirm this (or not).

Lister of Smeg 20-08-2010 10:47 AM

who cares Rachels pathetic she latched on to Nathan so she can get a bit of publicity thats all and there talk in the task room last night was so edited cuting and pasting words and sentances together the person who got off lightly the other day was Josie she spent the entire day nearly ranting about John and Sam and BB decided they only had to show 5 minutes of it (Suprise Suprise) .

Adamw92 20-08-2010 10:48 AM

His issue with her is that she's better looking than him :joker:

Claymores 20-08-2010 10:49 AM

Racheal is a horrible asshole - skippy called it correct How much beef has she put on lately apart from unibrow?????

Lister of Smeg 20-08-2010 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3687835)
John James has a problem with non-white females, methinks. Well all females really ;) - but particularly those who are not of the same ethnicity as him.

Not to excuse that, but it is part of his Aussie background - the "Abos", as they call their indigenous people, have not been well-treated, historically.

For an Aussie man to have a non-white g/f is probably social death. Perhaps any Aussies on here would like to confirm this (or not).

do us all a favour and keep your thoughts to yourself calling someone a racist is a very serious thing to which you have no proof .

CaudleHalbard 20-08-2010 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lister of Smeg (Post 3687851)
do us all a favour and keep your thoughts to yourself calling someone a racist is a very serious thing to which you have no proof .

I have not called him a racist. I am saying his cultural background shapes his thoughts and actions -just as our own cultural backgorunds shape ours.

You can't get away from that.

John James is not an overt racist, but he can't help being influenced by the society of which he is a part.

BBAroudtheGlobe 20-08-2010 11:02 AM

She's way out of his league and he is uncomfortable with that.

He's like a young boy who picks on girls and pulls their hair in class when he likes them.

Plus, he's simply a misogynist, who clearly doesn't know how to interact well with the opposite sex.

Sunday 20-08-2010 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3687835)
John James has a problem with non-white females, methinks. Well all females really ;) - but particularly those who are not of the same ethnicity as him.

Not to excuse that, but it is part of his Aussie background - the "Abos", as they call their indigenous people, have not been well-treated, historically.

For an Aussie man to have a non-white g/f is probably social death. Perhaps any Aussies on here would like to confirm this (or not).



Why is it when a person of ethnic background is not liked by someone, people think its a racism thing???

You know, not many people liked her and thats why she got evicted. Did you see her video she sent in to get into the house?? so bigheaded and up herself.

chuff me dizzy 20-08-2010 11:04 AM

He just doesnt like her ... nothing sinister ,nobody likes everyone they meet ,why should he be different ? I can dislike people for no apparnat reason ,its life

Sunday 20-08-2010 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3687868)
I have not called him a racist. I am saying his cultural background shapes his thoughts and actions -just as our own cultural backgorunds shape ours.

You can't get away from that.

John James is not an overt racist, but he can't help being influenced by the society of which he is a part.


It sounded like a racism comment, you just went round the houses.

Lister of Smeg 20-08-2010 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBAroudtheGlobe (Post 3687876)
She's way out of his league and he is uncomfortable with that.

He's like a young boy who picks on girls and pulls their hair in class when he likes them.

Plus, he's simply a misogynist, who clearly doesn't know how to interact well with the opposite sex.

doubt that i bet if he clicked his fingers she would come running back to him it was her in the DR in week 1 crying asking why he didnt fancy her not him :joker: so id say she is not in his league :joker:.

CaudleHalbard 20-08-2010 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunday (Post 3687880)
Why is it when a person of ethnic background is not liked by someone, people think its a racism thing???

JJ1 had problems with Rachael and Rachel, as I recall.

It is highly unlikely he comes into contact with black girls (e.g. Aborigines) back in Australia.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunday (Post 3687887)
It sounded like a racism comment, you just went round the houses.

No - it was you who were determined to put on the "racism" tag. Burying our heads in the sands doesn't improve understanding between races.

Lister of Smeg 20-08-2010 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3687896)
JJ1 had problems with Rachael and Rachel, as I recall.

It is highly unlikely he comes into contact with black girls (e.g. Aborigines) back in Australia.

John dislikes Corin and Ben to and there the same colour as he is so your theory fails .

Lister of Smeg 20-08-2010 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3687896)
JJ1 had problems with Rachael and Rachel, as I recall.

It is highly unlikely he comes into contact with black girls (e.g. Aborigines) back in Australia.



No - it was you who were determined to put on the "racism" tag. Burying our heads in the sands doesn't improve understanding between races.

also he never said he hates Rachael 2 he simply said her voice was anoying .

Sunday 20-08-2010 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lister of Smeg (Post 3687903)
John dislikes Corin and Ben to and there the same colour as he is so your theory fails .

Exactly!!!

Sunday 20-08-2010 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3687896)
JJ1 had problems with Rachael and Rachel, as I recall.

It is highly unlikely he comes into contact with black girls (e.g. Aborigines) back in Australia.



No - it was you who were determined to put on the "racism" tag. Burying our heads in the sands doesn't improve understanding between races.



Er no, looking at your post and the one saying about the two Rachels says its deffo you .
And you know these bloody race post annoy the **** out of me. Because its a bit like cry wolf, when there is a race problem, people will start saying, oh that old chestnut!! And not take it seriously as it should be.

So stop stirring the crap when there is no proof!!

BBAroudtheGlobe 20-08-2010 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lister of Smeg (Post 3687888)
doubt that i bet if he clicked his fingers she would come running back to him it was her in the DR in week 1 crying asking why he didnt fancy her not him :joker: so id say she is not in his league :joker:.

Doubt that. He is clearly a momma's boy and Josie is the perfect matronly figure to coddle him.

Rachel has moved on to a man that clearly scares the bricks out of John and he doesn't even have to be speak to him to do it.... or even be in the same room with him for that matter.

walter 20-08-2010 11:30 AM

he never wanted her. He hates women who are up themselves and think they are the dogs bollox when they are not! I would be exactly the same and HATE her if i was there

fitz2k2 20-08-2010 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karezza (Post 3687781)
Rachel is an idiot. Her romance with Nathan is fake. She was horrible to Sunshine.

I guess you never seen the photos.omg rachel is fake because she looks like beyonce omg rachel is fake because she get money to show her boobs big whoop geez

bobsback 20-08-2010 12:17 PM

[QUOTE=Claymores;3687844]Racheal is a horrible asshole QUOTE]

Well said.

Livia 20-08-2010 12:22 PM

John James in deeply disrespectful. His mother should hang her head in shame. Even worse then the way he acted toward Rachael was the glee he showed when he returned that he'd almost made a girl cry. He's a drippy little dick and one day he's going to open his ignorant, smart mouth to someone who'll not be as restrained as Rachael was and he'll end up in an ambulance doing sixty. Now THAT I'd tune in to see.

Lister of Smeg 20-08-2010 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBAroudtheGlobe (Post 3687964)
Doubt that. He is clearly a momma's boy and Josie is the perfect matronly figure to coddle him.

Rachel has moved on to a man that clearly scares the bricks out of John and he doesn't even have to be speak to him to do it.... or even be in the same room with him for that matter.

lol if John put out to her her pants would be around her ankles within seconds seriously she even said that she chose to give him a massage because she didnt want to upset Nathan why dont you want to up set Nathan if you dont feel anything sexual for John ? sorry the truth is she fancy the pants off of John and he knocked her back so now shes had to settle for second best .

Lex 20-08-2010 12:55 PM

Rachael is no innocent little victim....That's for sure....it's just the role that she chose to play , and it backfired on her 'bigstyle'!
Having said that.....Crabby is a 24 year old 'insecure' little mummys-boy!, that would be far too scared of engaging in a showmance with someone who is on an 'equal-footing' in the relationship!(Prettyness-wise)
I doubt that he would ever be able to come to terms with 'equality' in any relationship, throughout the rest of his life!(Insecurity is an underestimated affliction!)
So this 'expected Showmance' was never going to happen!
And with 'our ozzy hero' being a coniseur of this particular gameshow, ...he quickly deduced that someone even better to look at than himself, was a threat to his dominance of the 'posing strategy'!..Specially if she were to pair up with someone,such as Nathan or whoever?
And I believe that it was this reasoning that lead directly to his persistant verbal tirade towards Rachael,....Which turned out to be a successful strategy, and lead directly to her eviction!!
It was then, that he started to ramp up his game , and chose Josie to be the 'lucky lady' , and recieve 'the players' false-attention!
After-all, she was safe!...A plain-jane who would be only too pleased to have 'such a super-hunks attention'!!....It was a perfect match!...God's gift to women, and a thoroughly nice, down to earth lad, that isnt interested in superficiality or fame and fortune!!
Little did he know....that he had just happened to pick this years 'smartest cookie' to execute his gameplan with!!.....She ate him up and spit him out!!
Not so smart now John James....are we?? :devil:

supergirthuk 20-08-2010 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunday (Post 3687817)
He doesnt like girls that are up their own backside and she kept giving him that snarly look.:hugesmile:

The snarly look?

What about the looks he gives people and the way he talks to people. He would seriously have trouble giving anyone any looks if I had been on the show co I would have been thrown out and he would have had his jaw broken and his ugly mug in a sling permanently.

The snarly look is a mild irritant but the over reaction along with the total game playing of the guy and his attempts to claim he doesnt care about being on the show whilst frantically back-pedelling if he feels he may have made a error of judgement in his gameplan.

As for not liking girls up their own backside I think you'll find he has a reasonable hatred of most of womankind actually.

JustKaz 20-08-2010 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 3688088)
John James in deeply disrespectful. His mother should hang her head in shame. Even worse then the way he acted toward Rachael was the glee he showed when he returned that he'd almost made a girl cry. He's a drippy little dick and one day he's going to open his ignorant, smart mouth to someone who'll not be as restrained as Rachael was and he'll end up in an ambulance doing sixty. Now THAT I'd tune in to see.


Yes John James seemed quite proud of what he had said to Racheal, repeating it to HM, it was not till later that he found out who the boyfriend was that he papped, When Corin calmly explaine how Nathan was not happy he harly said a word back. Though his attitude before knowing was he didnt give a F what he said, bet if Corin said something before hand he would have ripped into here.

He was a disgrace and NO woman deseved to be spoke about let alone too her face like he did.

Racheals VT was unfort her downfall, and thats why the public didnt even give her a chance in there. How many other HM have lived up to their VT's?

Keith_Can 20-08-2010 01:44 PM

I wouldn't call him racist but he clearly has some issues. I believe he seen Racheal who was the hottest female not fancying him and that didn't sit well with him. So he pulled a heavy,. got her butt outa the house,. the rest is history. Well not really,. because he pulled the same crap on Carin who stuck up for herself and put that auzzie tw*t in his place. It's all about the power struggle.

And it's blatently obvious he doesn't love Josie,. he's secretly way too hot in his own mind to be dating her. I do believe though he has a good heart,. The conflict between knowing in your heart something feels right,. and in your head where all the pre-conceived notions about your looks and how people perceive you exist can be huge life altering dilema,. I believe thats also why he wants to go hide somewhere,. put his head in the sand.

sosadbbend 20-08-2010 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eye sea (Post 3687772)
I thought his behaviour towards Rachael was disgusting.

I think she did well to stop herself from spitting on John James' back, never mind massage it.

I think the truth is he really wanted her, but he feared she'd knock him back. That's why the hate.

I think apart from the one comment he made to her that was a bit ott, he called it right and she gave back as good as she got. She was the one on the show that couldn't believe he didn't fancy her.

WOMBAI 20-08-2010 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lister of Smeg (Post 3687836)
who cares Rachels pathetic she latched on to Nathan so she can get a bit of publicity thats all and there talk in the task room last night was so edited cuting and pasting words and sentances together the person who got off lightly the other day was Josie she spent the entire day nearly ranting about John and Sam and BB decided they only had to show 5 minutes of it (Suprise Suprise) .

The effeminate gob on a stick - is a spineless coward! Don't think much of Rachel - but even she is too good for him!

Part-timer 20-08-2010 02:30 PM

I think its cause they have a common similiarity.
Crabby dosn't chat girls up .He dosn't know how. He is used to girls (probabley younger than him)chatting him up cause they think he's 'georgous'.

Rachel similiarily probably dosn't chat blokes up too often (cause she dosn't have to) so there lies the conflict .

I think its obvious that he found her attractive(she is) but she was never gonna chat him up . This is where i think his massive ego took a blow.

Two of a kind if you ask me.

'Conor 20-08-2010 02:31 PM

he was such a ***** to her

Mr XcX 20-08-2010 02:33 PM

I think he wants to SHAG her!!!

Yet, John James just flirts in an asshole way!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.