ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   UK sixth form college bans the veil :for security reasons (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162971)

arista 24-09-2010 02:36 PM

UK sixth form college bans the veil :for security reasons
 
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/...56_468x334.jpg
"Burnley College. Bosses claim the ban was necessary for 'security reasons'
but the University of Central Lancashire,
which runs courses from the same building, has not implemented the policy

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz10SQs3Da0



Its a Logical Start for this College.
It makes Utter Sense.

Sign Of The Times.

Tom 24-09-2010 05:31 PM

Someone emailed Granada News who goes there and said its a security issue, hoodies, scarves, hats and so on are all banned too

King Gizzard 24-09-2010 05:35 PM

security issue, ''I'm going to stab you with my hoody!''

Tom 24-09-2010 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nate (Post 3808566)
security issue, ''I'm going to stab you with my hoody!''

No so they can identify people so someone who isn't meant to be there isn't there. My college had a similar policy

arista 24-09-2010 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom (Post 3808576)
No so they can identify people so someone who isn't meant to be there isn't there. My college had a similar policy


That makes sense.

Jessica. 24-09-2010 05:44 PM

They could easily get a clever person to wear their 'peep scarf' and do their exams and nobody would notice.

Scarves and veils and stuff should be banned in all schools.

Beastie 24-09-2010 05:46 PM

What if it is reaaaaaaaaaally cold and you want to wear a hat, scarf and gloves?

Jessica. 24-09-2010 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebeast (Post 3808593)
What if it is reaaaaaaaaaally cold and you want to wear a hat, scarf and gloves?

You take them off before you go in the door. :laugh3:

King Gizzard 24-09-2010 05:55 PM

Ahh ok

Lee. 24-09-2010 05:59 PM

I think they should be banned everywhere, not just schools!

Angus 24-09-2010 06:00 PM

What would happen if every student decided to turn up to college with their faces covered? FGS, I am sick to death of muslims using the faith card to get away with avoiding security measures, when it is a fact that the full face burkha is NOT a religious requirement in the Qu'ran. It's about time there was a complete ban on it just as there is in France. I don't see why our safety and security should be put at risk for a minority who insist on wearing what is, after all, just a cultural uniform, not a religious requirement. As a woman, I also find it offensive that in this day and age, woman are subjugated by such an abhorrent garment.

Jack_ 24-09-2010 06:03 PM

If one religious/cultural garment/symbol gets banned - then so should the rest. So crosses and crusifix necklaces etc all have to go. It's not fair otherwise.

It's either it all gets banned or none of it gets banned. Personally, I'd rather the former, I've always thought religion is the root of all evil.

Lee. 24-09-2010 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3808617)
If one religious/cultural garment/symbol gets banned - then so should the rest. So crosses and crusifix necklaces etc all have to go. It's not fair otherwise.

It's either it all gets banned or none of it gets banned. Personally, I'd rather the former, I've always thought religion is the root of all evil.

The Burkha symbolises oppresion of women, it is not a religious symbol in the same way a crucifix is.

Jack_ 24-09-2010 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by happyland (Post 3808619)
The Burkha symbolises oppresion of women, it is not a religious symbol in the same way a crucifix is.

It doesn't make a difference - it is still associated with religion and thus if one religious symbol [or whatever you want to call it] is banned, all of them are. You can't have it one way to suit some people and not another, that's just unfair. It either all goes or it all stays - simple.

Tom 24-09-2010 06:13 PM

Crucifixes are fashion statements now too, you won't find a burka in Topshop

Shaun 24-09-2010 06:21 PM

*designs a range of designer burkas*

they're neon pink. you can also get leopard-prints. :)

Angus 24-09-2010 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3808617)
If one religious/cultural garment/symbol gets banned - then so should the rest. So crosses and crusifix necklaces etc all have to go. It's not fair otherwise.

It's either it all gets banned or none of it gets banned. Personally, I'd rather the former, I've always thought religion is the root of all evil.

The difference being that this is an historically christian country, and those that come here know that and should respect our culture. I think we do more than enough to accommodate other people's faiths and cultures but in the case of the burkha which actually compromises national security, it's about time it was banned in circumstances where it is crucial for the safety and security of others. Why should one person's "human rights" to wear what they want, compromise someone else's "human rights" to feel safe and secure?

Last time I looked no christian adornments or apparel threatened anyone else's security. A bit of common sense is needed here.

After all if you are going to play the "culture" card, is it acceptable then to allow honour killings, polygamy, and marriage at 12 years of age because that is the cultural norm in certain countries whose citizens CHOOSE to come to the UK? For the umpteenth time, the burkha is a symbol of female subjugation, imposed on women by MEN not some divine entity. It offends me every time I see a women wearing one.

Jack_ 24-09-2010 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angus58 (Post 3808651)
The difference being that this is an historically christian country, and those that come here know that and should respect our culture. I think we do more than enough to accommodate other people's faiths and cultures but in the case of the burkha which actually compromises national security, it's about time it was banned in circumstances where it is crucial for the safety and security of others. Why should one person's "human rights" to wear what they want, compromise someone else's "human rights" to feel safe and secure?

Last time I looked no christian adornments or apparel threatened anyone else's security. A bit of common sense is needed here.

After all if you are going to play the "culture" card, is it acceptable then to allow honour killings, polygamy, and marriage at 12 years of age because that is the cultural norm in certain countries whose citizens CHOOSE to come to the UK? For the umpteenth time, the burkha is a symbol of female subjugation, imposed on women by MEN not some divine entity. It offends me every time I see a women wearing one.

I'm not saying people don't have a right to feel safe, they do. But you can't ban one religious item and not the rest. That's unfair.

Whether we are 'historically a Christian country' or not, it all has to go.

Ban religion completely and then maybe we'll be living in a slightly safer planet.

Angus 24-09-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3808659)
I'm not saying people don't have a right to feel safe, they do. But you can't ban one religious item and not the rest. That's unfair.

Whether we are 'historically a Christian country' or not, it all has to go.

Ban religion completely and then maybe we'll be living in a slightly safer planet.

I repeat, the burkha is NOT a religious requirement, it is a cultural one, and one that is offensive to most independent, EQUAL women. You, not being a woman, seem to find that hard to understand. Since it is NOT a requirement of the muslim religion, there is absolutely no reason why women who want the freedom and equality to attend college with their male counterparts, should wear it at all. If they want to retain their so called "modesty" why not just wear the hijab which allows the face to be seen?

Oh, and good luck to any government that ever tried to ban ALL religions - cue world war 3. As it is christians in this country are already being persecuted and being treated like second class citizens. If people choose to be agnostics or atheists that's fine by me, but they do not have the right to prohibit others from following whatever faith they wish. Outward accoutrements and apparel don't signify faith, the observance of doctrine is all that is required, so it is no big deal to compromise on a garment, especially when these women have the option to wear a hijab.

BB_Eye 24-09-2010 08:20 PM

I remember when they gave religious groups and churches an exemption from the Equality Bill. The excuse they gave and the excuse people still give is that it wasn't workable in practice as it meant churches weren't free to set their own moral guidelines regarding women and gay people.

But apparently, when it comes to banning the veil, muslims just have to deal with it and girls who have been brought up their whole lives to wear a veil in public will just have to see the errors of their ways?

Sounds like good old-fashioned intolerance rears its ugly head once again. I hope the school is prosecuted for denying people the right to live according to their faith.

Angus 24-09-2010 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB_Eye (Post 3808865)
I remember when they gave religious groups and churches an exemption from the Equality Bill. The excuse they gave and the excuse people still give is that it wasn't workable in practice as it meant churches weren't free to set their own moral guidelines regarding women and gay people.

But apparently, when it comes to banning the veil, muslims just have to deal with it and girls who have been brought up their whole lives to wear a veil in public will just have to see the errors of their ways?

Sounds like good old-fashioned intolerance rears its ugly head once again. I hope the school is prosecuted for denying people the right to live according to their faith.

I lived in the Middle East for four years and I can assure you that good old fashioned intolerance is alive and well and always will be in a muslim country when it comes to adjusting THEIR ways to us westerners which, by the way, I had absolutely no problem with since I had CHOSEN to live in THEIR country. Thus I had to cover up and not wear short skirts, or display bare arms or a cleavage, and would be sweltering in 50 degree heat for fear of offending their sensibilities by a flash of bare flesh. It is called respect for the host culture, its laws and norms. We do more than enough in this country already to respect others' culture and it is not too much to ask that there should be some sort of compromise from those who come here. A hijab is more than acceptable in place of the burkha which, by the way, most arab women did NOT wear except in the more remote areas of Kuwait, Saudi and Bahrain that I lived and worked in. Most muslim women find the burkha as offensive as western women do, and unless you are female you might not get the significance of what the burkha actually is. It was explained to me that it is a visual sign of ownership and possession of the woman by a man.

Banning the veil has absolutely NOTHING to do with religious intolerance but everything to do with safety and security, as well as the liberation, respect and freedom of women. The veil is a symbol of FEMALE SUBJUGATION and is abhorrent and offensive not only to most western women but also to a lot of liberated and independent muslim women. It is a demeaning subjugation imposed by muslim men and is sexist and totally retroactive to gender equality. We live in a modern society where women have fought hard for equality, and the veil is a potent and virulent symbol of the oppression and "inferiority" of women.

Far from being an intolerant country, the UK bends over backwards to accommodate all cultures, but it is now being recognised (too late) that multiculturalism does not work when every culture keeps itself separate and refuses to integrate even minimally with the mainstream culture. No-one has yet satisfactorily explained how diametrically diverse cultures can coexist in peace and harmony without some common ground being found, and MUTUAL respect fostered. Banning the burkha is common sense in this day and age - why should one section of the community be exempt from abiding by the rules and regulations the rest of us must abide by?

I'm sick of men on this forum supporting the wearing of the burkha when it is so obvious that if the boot were on the other foot, men would never be subjected to such an indignity by women.

I note you do not address your support of other so called "cultural" norms, examples of which I gave in my previous post, but then again you couldn't really, could you?

As regards prosecuting the college for banning the burkha, I hope that those colleges that still allow the burkha are similarly prosecuted for failing to practise equality in the application of their regulations, and failure to assure the safety of their students by condoning the anonymity of the burkha so that no-one knows who the hell is coming in and out of the college, or for that matter taking the exams.

WOMBAI 25-09-2010 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3808617)
If one religious/cultural garment/symbol gets banned - then so should the rest. So crosses and crusifix necklaces etc all have to go. It's not fair otherwise.

It's either it all gets banned or none of it gets banned. Personally, I'd rather the former, I've always thought religion is the root of all evil.

What bull - it isn't about it being a religious/cultural garmet and has bugger all to do with fairness - it is a security risk, simples! As a poster has already mentioned the burka is not a religious requirement of the Quran! Many use it as an excuse to get preferential treatment and give priority to their religion!

WOMBAI 25-09-2010 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angus58 (Post 3808935)
I lived in the Middle East for four years and I can assure you that good old fashioned intolerance is alive and well and always will be in a muslim country when it comes to adjusting THEIR ways to us westerners which, by the way, I had absolutely no problem with since I had CHOSEN to live in THEIR country. Thus I had to cover up and not wear short skirts, or display bare arms or a cleavage, and would be sweltering in 50 degree heat for fear of offending their sensibilities by a flash of bare flesh. It is called respect for the host culture, its laws and norms. We do more than enough in this country already to respect others' culture and it is not too much to ask that there should be some sort of compromise from those who come here. A hijab is more than acceptable in place of the burkha which, by the way, most arab women did NOT wear except in the more remote areas of Kuwait, Saudi and Bahrain that I lived and worked in. Most muslim women find the burkha as offensive as western women do, and unless you are female you might not get the significance of what the burkha actually is. It was explained to me that it is a visual sign of ownership and possession of the woman by a man.

Banning the veil has absolutely NOTHING to do with religious intolerance but everything to do with safety and security, as well as the liberation, respect and freedom of women. The veil is a symbol of FEMALE SUBJUGATION and is abhorrent and offensive not only to most western women but also to a lot of liberated and independent muslim women. It is a demeaning subjugation imposed by muslim men and is sexist and totally retroactive to gender equality. We live in a modern society where women have fought hard for equality, and the veil is a potent and virulent symbol of the oppression and "inferiority" of women.

Far from being an intolerant country, the UK bends over backwards to accommodate all cultures, but it is now being recognised (too late) that multiculturalism does not work when every culture keeps itself separate and refuses to integrate even minimally with the mainstream culture. No-one has yet satisfactorily explained how diametrically diverse cultures can coexist in peace and harmony without some common ground being found, and MUTUAL respect fostered. Banning the burkha is common sense in this day and age - why should one section of the community be exempt from abiding by the rules and regulations the rest of us must abide by?

I'm sick of men on this forum supporting the wearing of the burkha when it is so obvious that if the boot were on the other foot, men would never be subjected to such an indignity by women.

I note you do not address your support of other so called "cultural" norms, examples of which I gave in my previous post, but then again you couldn't really, could you?

As regards prosecuting the college for banning the burkha, I hope that those colleges that still allow the burkha are similarly prosecuted for failing to practise equality in the application of their regulations, and failure to assure the safety of their students by condoning the anonymity of the burkha so that no-one knows who the hell is coming in and out of the college, or for that matter taking the exams.

Well said - I agree with every word!

joeysteele 25-09-2010 08:41 AM

I think every Human being and all citizens of any Country should have the full right to be able to see clearly the other people that they share buildings,events and streets with.
That should be the overriding factor as to real community and security too.

MTVN 25-09-2010 09:58 AM

Oh please, not the whole "they should respect our culture" argument again. We are not purely a Christian country, we are a secular one, perhaps the most secular country in the world. Not only that but we are a tolerant country. Why do people always compare us to countries in the Middle East where they dictate their clothing style to their citizens there. Thank God we do not do that, I would hate it if we such a strict and intolerant society so as to not have the simplest freedom to wear whatever clothes we wanted. Yes it was their culture there, maybe, but it isn't ours here, and we should be thankful for that.

What the hell is British culture anyway, people always parrot on about it and I'm yet to have a heard a decent definition, or a definition that would prevent someone wearing what they want. Since when did our culture dictate what clothes someone can and cannot wear!?

I cant belive some women are actually offended by the burkha. You may consider it a symbol of female subjugation, but most who wear it dont, not in this country. It is their right to choose to wear it, is their own personal choice, if they want to wear the Burkha then they can, and do, wear it.

National security may be a valid argument to ban the burkha. So would the fact that it does restricts integration and communication in a lot of ways, which is needed if you want a succesful multicultural society. But the arguments about preserving our culture, the UK being a Christian country, and it being a symbol of female oppression are not, not in my view anyway.

InOne 27-09-2010 08:25 PM

Why are they using the term 'veil' as if it's some modest attire. They're covered head to toe in black fgs! Obviously is presents a security thread. I really don't know what they expected in a college where you are needed to prove your identity. It's not about culture or anything like that, it's common sense.

NettoSuperstar! 30-09-2010 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 3809722)
Oh please, not the whole "they should respect our culture" argument again. We are not purely a Christian country, we are a secular one, perhaps the most secular country in the world. Not only that but we are a tolerant country. Why do people always compare us to countries in the Middle East where they dictate their clothing style to their citizens there. Thank God we do not do that, I would hate it if we such a strict and intolerant society so as to not have the simplest freedom to wear whatever clothes we wanted. Yes it was their culture there, maybe, but it isn't ours here, and we should be thankful for that.

What the hell is British culture anyway, people always parrot on about it and I'm yet to have a heard a decent definition, or a definition that would prevent someone wearing what they want. Since when did our culture dictate what clothes someone can and cannot wear!?

I cant belive some women are actually offended by the burkha. You may consider it a symbol of female subjugation, but most who wear it dont, not in this country. It is their right to choose to wear it, is their own personal choice, if they want to wear the Burkha then they can, and do, wear it.

National security may be a valid argument to ban the burkha. So would the fact that it does restricts integration and communication in a lot of ways, which is needed if you want a succesful multicultural society. But the arguments about preserving our culture, the UK being a Christian country, and it being a symbol of female oppression are not, not in my view anyway.

Aye its the usual bigots, coming out with crap...like christain oppression LOL....and what about the muslims that were born here? noooo they dont count, theyre not one of us...the sad thing is kids are going round my sons school calling people muslim as an insult...people are listening to this crap and going ug ug me hate muslim

WOMBAI 30-09-2010 02:59 PM

QUOTE=NettoSuperstar!;3819183]Aye its the usual bigots, coming out with crap...like christain oppression LOL....and what about the muslims that were born here? noooo they dont count, theyre not one of us...the sad thing is kids are going round my sons school calling people muslim as an insult...people are listening to this crap and going ug ug me hate muslim[/QUOTE]

Security is the primary concern here - not Muslim womens' right to choose - the burka is not even a religious requirement! We all have to abide by such security rules - Muslims being no exception! They have no right to preferrential treatment - much as they may desire it! ug, ug! :nono:

MTVN 30-09-2010 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 3819296)
Security is the primary concern here - not Muslim womens' right to choose - the burka is not even a religious requiment! We all have to abide by such security rules - Muslims being no exception! They have no right to preferrential treatment - much as they may desire it! ug, ug! :nono:

Well lets hypothetically say that the Burqa is banned on security grounds. The result would be increased suspicion of Muslims (as the banning of the veil implies that all Muslims who wear it are instantly terror suspects), they will feel offended and discriminated, and our relations with Islam would be even worse than they are now. That is what could increase terrorism here.

Who cares if is isnt strictly speaking a religious requirement. Neither is wearing a crucifix for Christians, neither is wearing the kippah for Jews, yet they are entitled to wear them, and Muslims are entitled to wear the burqa.

InOne 30-09-2010 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 3819362)
Well lets hypothetically say that the Burqa is banned on security grounds. The result would be increased suspicion of Muslims (as the banning of the veil implies that all Muslims who wear it are instantly terror suspects), they will feel offended and discriminated, and our relations with Islam would be even worse than they are now. That is what could increase terrorism here.

Who cares if is isnt strictly speaking a religious requirement. Neither is wearing a crucifix for Christians, neither is wearing the kippah for Jews, yet they are entitled to wear them, and Muslims are entitled to wear the burqa.

I think banning the burka in a few school isn't really going to increase a terrorism threat. Come on. They can feel offended all they want, but most Muslims probably wouldn't be offended by it. The Media are Muslims worst enemy when it comes to think they this. Reporting on one over excited girl that feels 'offended', I'm sure most would just tell her to get over herself.

Niall 30-09-2010 04:00 PM

I'm guessing this is for the full face veil/Burkha?

If so then I can totally understand why they would ban it. What if a student were to steal another student's property? How would they check the student's identity? I'm not saying I agree but I just understand why they are doing this.

Personally I don't understand why the Burkha is worn anyway. I don't see the need to cover a woman's entire face. It's unnecessary. And I know the way Muslim women dress is to keep their modesty but covering the entire face is a little bit silly in my point of view. The veil where you can see the face is fine - why can't Muslim women wear it?

arista 30-09-2010 04:04 PM

"Personally I don't understand why the Burkha is worn anyway"


Some due to Strict Extreme Muslim Parents.

Niall 30-09-2010 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 3819447)
"Personally I don't understand why the Burkha is worn anyway"


Some due to Strict Extreme Muslim Parents.

Oh ok, that would make sense, its just that most of the Muslims who I've seen speak about it, come across as that they chose to wear the Burkha. I've always thought it would be very uncomfortable to wear too.

Angus 30-09-2010 04:10 PM

I don't give a toss whether muslims are offended by the banning of the burkha in a case such as this. It is common sense that it is necessary to see the identity of people going in and out of public buildings such as colleges, banks, schools, airports, etc etc. As it is, being a Londoner, I feel very uneasy when I have to travel on public transport with women wearing the full burkha. If Muslims don't GET that, well tough. I'm fed up with having to consider THEIR feelings, how about a bit of recipricocity and commonsense here for a change?

MTVN 30-09-2010 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne (Post 3819407)
I think banning the burka in a few school isn't really going to increase a terrorism threat. Come on. They can feel offended all they want, but most Muslims probably wouldn't be offended by it. The Media are Muslims worst enemy when it comes to think they this. Reporting on one over excited girl that feels 'offended', I'm sure most would just tell her to get over herself.

Ah I was talking on a more general level. The impression I got from Angus and Wombai was that they wanted it banned altogether with their "it isn't our culture" and "it's a symbol of female oppression" bull. In the case of a school then they have the right to ban it if they please, and that would be fair enough, but I dont think it should women should be completely banned from wearing it in public.

MTVN 30-09-2010 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angus58 (Post 3819467)
I don't give a toss whether muslims are offended by the banning of the burkha in a case such as this. It is common sense that it is necessary to see the identity of people going in and out of public buildings such as colleges, banks, schools, airports, etc etc. As it is, being a Londoner, I feel very uneasy when I have to travel on public transport with women wearing the full burkha. If Muslims don't GET that, well tough. I'm fed up with having to consider THEIR feelings, how about a bit of recipricocity and commonsense here for a change?

Poor you, they should stop wearing a piece of clothing of huge importance to them just on the off chance that some uptight londoner feels a bit uncomfortable. Get over yourself :rolleyes:

InOne 30-09-2010 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 3819529)
Ah I was talking on a more general level. The impression I got from Angus and Wombai was that they wanted it banned altogether with their "it isn't our culture" and "it's a symbol of female oppression" bull. In the case of a school then they have the right to ban it if they please, and that would be fair enough, but I dont think it should women should be completely banned from wearing it in public.

To be fair it is a symbol of opression lol But I don't think it impacts on our culture. It's still going strong I feel, just need to go to the right places.

MTVN 30-09-2010 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Me! (Post 3819457)
Oh ok, that would make sense, its just that most of the Muslims who I've seen speak about it, come across as that they chose to wear the Burkha. I've always thought it would be very uncomfortable to wear too.

For the vast majority of those who wear it in this country it is their choice.
The number of Muslims who wear the burqa numbers only a couple of thousand, they're a tiny minority within a minority, people should stop getting so worked up about it :bored:

MTVN 30-09-2010 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne (Post 3819537)
To be fair it is a symbol of opression lol But I don't think it impacts on our culture. It's still going strong I feel, just need to go to the right places.

Only when the husband forces the woman to wear it though, which happens very rarely in the UK. If they want to wear it, and they make the choice themselves then I dont see the problem tbh :shrug:

InOne 30-09-2010 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 3819547)
Only when the husband forces the woman to wear it though, which happens very rarely in the UK. If they want to wear it, and they make the choice themselves then I dont see the problem tbh :shrug:

Yes but it stems back from where they or their parents come from. It was the taliban who forced Women to wear the Burka without choice. And why should a rare occasion be missed? And I doubt it's that rare the amount that wear them. Some came here to escape the way of life back home and now they're seeing it here. Now it has become some sort of fashion trend to the ignorant muslim youth.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.