![]() |
Naiive question about site protocol/set-up
Is there not a way in which only logged-in members can view certain parts of the site?
I can see that it is good for the health of the site that guests can view any threads/discussion on BB/any other show simply by coming-in from google. But some parts of the site such as chat n games seem a bit more for members, yet a casual onlooker could "Meet the Members" (I'm presuming why that's why you have thought twice about under 16s involved). Many sites I have visited have limited access on forums - "enter your ID" |
Might put people off joining though. Not like we get many new members and I doubt that that many are eager to join
|
I agree some threads could/should be made private/members only.
|
Quote:
If a casual browser had been interested enough to read thru crapola on BB12, and wanted to read what we say in chat n games, it might even encourage them to join..............just a thought |
Quote:
In essence, I understand why the suggestion has been raised and why - especially when Tibbs is known for having so many younger members. |
It's good suggestion. Something like Meet The Members should be viewable by members only for ... obvious reasons.
|
Thats a very good suggestion actually.
And I think it could be done...since thats kinda how the quiz teams bit worked |
Peoples walls should be made private too
|
This has been brought up a few times hasn't it? Don't think anything happened last time. I agree with MTM though, dodgy people out there :nono:
|
Quote:
|
ik, but I think it'd be better for the default to be for just members to see it, then you edit to what extent
|
What about these forums where you can view threads as a guest but only the text? Images don't show up for non members. Happened me loads of times.
|
I've brought this up in admin :)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Besides which it's your own peril if your Facebook is public, surely. Put it on private if you are paranoid about pic poaching methinks.
|
Quote:
It was only a suggestion for consideration. :) |
Quote:
Really not with it today :laugh: |
Quote:
|
I know, I understood it.
I think if someone wants to make their Facebook open and wants to give away their full name well they know what to expect. If you don't want pics taken ... or at least the risk of it ... don't give away your full name if your Facebook is an open account. Common sense, really. |
Quote:
It's not a 'who is right' situ: it's a 'possibly consideration' only. It's Tibbs' decision, as members, we can put forward suggestions/ ideas - they don't necessarily have to be implemented. |
Yeah, I'm aware of all that. Why do you have to constantly defend your viewpoint as if either A) Someone hasn't understood it or B) They've failed to see it's just a suggestion and someones opinion.
I know all of that. I just ... ****ing disagree with it lol. I don't think we should be censoring links to other sites to babysit people. That's ... it really :conf2: |
Quote:
It's nothing more than suggestions from current members - and opinions will of course vary. It doesn't make any of us right or wrong. I'm aware that you may personally may understand what I mean, but I'm also very aware than not everyone reading, may have that same level of understanding (if that makes sense!) |
Another potent argument for raising the age limit of the site to 16+ to to be honest. It's hillarious at best and irresponsible at worst to expect 13 year olds to virtually hand you the cash revenue through repeat webpage hits for a show that isin't even intended for that audience. And all it does - and let's be honest - is produce 9/10 annoying, disruptive members the forum would be a lot cleaner and more coherent without.
Young teens and forums just don't mix. |
Quote:
Currently - the active members who offer the higher rate of contribution to this forum, many are under the 16 / 18 years bracket - regardless of what the TV show intended 'target audience' is. As I say, I do agree with you, but at the risk of stating the very obvious, the forum doesn't belong to us and all we can do is put forward our 'ifs, buts, maybe, what about this' scenarios. |
Pyr - please do not get too angry - treat it for what it is or eff off to DS and see how awful it is there!!!!!!!!!!! Oldies (over 20s) gravitate particularly during a live BB and learn to ignore the snipes. I invented "4am club" cos allthe waynes were in beddy-byes and adults talked
|
Quote:
:conf::conf: Errr...... I was actually on your side in respect of what your suggestion was. Sorry I put my viewpoint over...... Bliddy nora. :shocked: |
Quote:
|
Perhaps there could be a forum specifically for photo's that is private, including meet the members, so that a lot of the board can still be seen to 'the outside' and still look inviting. It could also lead to people maybe having their own personal threads (diaries as such) plus a lot of the creative writing could be hidden in there so not ripped off which we've seen happen
Of course, I'm not naive enough to believe that people who are friends of bannees wouldn't pass them on but it may make potential members feel more secure to join Oh, and this forum could be hidden too. Suggestions. So prying eyes wouldn't know whats going on |
Quote:
I couldn't agree more if I tried. :( I do appreciate your saying Iceman, I do. :) |
"Members only lounge"
If you want it hidden, outside eyes are forbidden :laugh: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do agree about having threads like MTMs set to members only though, good idea Ian |
Quote:
|
Oh and maybe there'd have to be a timeframe on when you got access though. Say 100 posts or it's pointless
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.