ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB12 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=586)
-   -   Harry being nominated because of his fox hunting (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184620)

headaball 14-09-2011 09:31 PM

Harry being nominated because of his fox hunting
 
They shouldn't be allowed. Bull**** noms that have got nothing to do with what has happened in the house.

D3vilish 14-09-2011 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headaball (Post 4561683)
They shouldn't be allowed. Bull**** noms that have got nothing to do with what has happened in the house.

He did speak about fox hunting in the house though tbh, And it might disgust people..

Not to mention theirs what we haven't seen, and if the way he acted to pamela is anything, then their reasons are valid..


Even if it was to look good in the public eye, it still happened, it still might of made people sick / angry / upset, and is a valid point.

Livia 14-09-2011 09:40 PM

Fox hunting is banned. Everyone feels so strongly about it that they don't even know that? He might used to hunt, but not any more.

fingers 14-09-2011 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 4561736)
Fox hunting is banned. Everyone feels so strongly about it that they don't even know that? He might used to hunt, but not any more.

Bet he still does though! but a piss poor reason to nominate him!

Livia 14-09-2011 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers (Post 4561760)
Bet he still does though! but a piss poor reason to nominate him!

There are far too many sabs watching hunts for them to do it and get away with it for any length of time. They can drag hunt...

I think they used it as an excuse to out the posh boy. It's okay to take the pee out of someone because of their background because they consider them to be posh. If they did the same to someone else because they were working class, or ethnic, or homosexual, people would be outraged.

Roy Mars III 14-09-2011 09:50 PM

The housemates want to look good in the public eye. It's ridiculous, you shouldn't nominate someone for something on the outside.

Livia 14-09-2011 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ (Post 4561789)
No it isn't, they have to shoot the fox now instead of letting a pack of dogs tear it apart. Also they are only allowed 2 dogs in a hunt.

Still brutal as hell, and I'm not condoning it in anyway.

Unfortunately, foxes have to be controlled. If they didn't shoot them, they'd poison them, which is a far worse death than a bullet.

jtalh2003 14-09-2011 09:55 PM

i would have nominated him for that if i was in there tbh

and its a better reason than what that other gave"because i watched him eat a egg and i dont like eggs"

fingers 14-09-2011 10:02 PM

and its a better reason than what that other gave"because i watched him eat a egg and i dont like eggs"

:joker::joker::joker::joker::joker:

▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ 14-09-2011 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 4561813)
Unfortunately, foxes have to be controlled. If they didn't shoot them, they'd poison them, which is a far worse death than a bullet.

Oh I totally agree, I actually live in a rural area and have firearms licences myself (prepares to get flamed). I misunderstood, I thought you meant it has been banned outright.

They still can chase the fox on horse back though, only they can't have a whole pack of dogs any more, only two, they also can't dig the fox out, once/if it goes to ground its hunt over. What normally happens is, the fox runs until its exhausted, and just stops running and they have to shoot it, whereas before the ban they would let the dogs kill it.
It still is an absolutely disgusting and barbaric practise, and has no place in a modern society.
What you describe above is vermin control, and is perfectly acceptable IMO and also necessary.

yoshi88 14-09-2011 10:30 PM

I think it is more than reason enough to nominate him. I think he is obviously a sick individual and I would have concerns for the other housemates so I really hope he does go.

Jords 14-09-2011 10:31 PM

Fair enough for 1 round of nominations but it shouldnt be allowed again.

yoshi88 14-09-2011 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jords (Post 4562029)
Fair enough for 1 round of nominations but it shouldnt be allowed again.

Fair left the building along with humanity when it comes to such perversion.

▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ 14-09-2011 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562023)
I would have concerns for the other housemates

Eh...thats a bit much don't ya think? Its not like he has his shotgun in the house with him or anything.

Mores the pity:joker:

Marc 14-09-2011 10:35 PM

Foxes are gross anyway.

yoshi88 14-09-2011 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ (Post 4562041)
Eh...thats a bit much don't ya think? Its not like he has his shotgun in the house with him or anything.

Mores the pity:joker:

Not really and I certainly would not trust him to look after children. Would you trust him?

jtalh2003 14-09-2011 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ (Post 4562041)
Eh...thats a bit much don't ya think? Its not like he has his shotgun in the house with him or anything.

Mores the pity:joker:

you never know that might have been his 1 luxury item :joker::joker:

yoshi88 14-09-2011 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc. (Post 4562045)
Foxes are gross anyway.

Compared to what humans? :conf:

Pyramid* 14-09-2011 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers (Post 4561868)
and its a better reason than what that other gave"because i watched him eat a egg and i dont like eggs"

:joker::joker::joker::joker::joker:


Better than that was Mark's additional comment along the lines of "he consumed it like it wasn't even there"

*Still trying to get my head round that one!!!* :hugesmile:

headaball 14-09-2011 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562023)
I think it is more than reason enough to nominate him. I think he is obviously a sick individual and I would have concerns for the other housemates so I really hope he does go.

Alex is the only one you should have concerns for. He might mistake her for some animal-based experiment that went wrong.

▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ 14-09-2011 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562050)
Not really and I certainly would not trust him to look after children. Would you trust him?

Are you serious? He hunts foxes not people...


Quote:

Originally Posted by jtalh2003 (Post 4562051)
you never know that might have been his 1 luxury item :joker::joker:

I bloody well hope so, we'd have an interesting "Dodge the buckshot task" if he did

Livia 14-09-2011 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ (Post 4561881)
Oh I totally agree, I actually live in a rural area and have firearms licences myself (prepares to get flamed). I misunderstood, I thought you meant it has been banned outright.

They still can chase the fox on horse back though, only they can't have a whole pack of dogs any more, only two, they also can't dig the fox out, once/if it goes to ground its hunt over. What normally happens is, the fox runs until its exhausted, and just stops running and they have to shoot it, whereas before the ban they would let the dogs kill it.
It still is an absolutely disgusting and barbaric practise, and has no place in a modern society.
What you describe above is vermin control, and is perfectly acceptable IMO and also necessary.

I live in the country myself, three miles from the nearest village. Everyone I know has a shotgun. I come from London though, and until you live in the countryside you really have no idea about foxes or animal control. I didn't when I moved here. Hunting with dogs for fun though... like you say disgusting and barbaric.

Livia 14-09-2011 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562050)
Not really and I certainly would not trust him to look after children. Would you trust him?

What a ridiculous thing to say.

jtalh2003 14-09-2011 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ (Post 4562063)
Are you serious? He hunts foxes not people...

didn't some change to hunting a bloke running round the country side dragging a aniseed bag behind him?

not sure what happened when they got him :joker::joker:

Marc 14-09-2011 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562055)
Compared to what humans? :conf:

yes. well done.

Mystic Mock 14-09-2011 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ (Post 4562063)
Are you serious? He hunts foxes not people...



I bloody well hope so, we'd have an interesting "Dodge the buckshot task" if he did

Lol you cruel bastard.:joker:

Although he can shoot Aden and Rebeckah.:joker:

yoshi88 14-09-2011 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc. (Post 4562079)
yes. well done.

So you think foxes are gross compared to human beings, ok could you explain that a bit please.

Livia 14-09-2011 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562085)
So you think foxes are gross compared to human beings, ok could you explain that a bit please.

You should see a henhouse after a fox has got in, killed them all for fun and eaten none of them.

yoshi88 14-09-2011 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 4562097)
You should see a henhouse after a fox has got in, killed them all for fun and eaten none of them.

Your wrong foxes do not kill for fun. Most animals need to find food every day to survive. Some nights are better than others in terms of food for a fox so, given the opportunity, foxes will always kill surplus food and cache (bury) it, to eat on another night when hunting is less good. This is a very successful strategy for surviving in the wild.

However, when a fox breaks into a hen house it is surrounded by easily caught prey. Its normal behaviour, and a good survival strategy is to kill all prey available and try to cache it. Given the option, the fox will come back for the remaining corpses and cache them.

The sun newspaper is not always the best place to learn facts. :nono:

▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ 14-09-2011 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562112)
Your wrong foxes do not kill for fun. Most animals need to find food every day to survive. Some nights are better than others in terms of food for a fox so, given the opportunity, foxes will always kill surplus food and cache (bury) it, to eat on another night when hunting is less good. This is a very successful strategy for surviving in the wild.

However, when a fox breaks into a hen house it is surrounded by easily caught prey. Its normal behaviour, and a good survival strategy is to kill all prey available and try to cache it. Given the option, the fox will come back for the remaining corpses and cache them.

The sun newspaper is not always the best place to learn facts. :nono:

Foxes are a pest no matter what way you try and paint it, and no its not actually a good survival strategy, considering I'm going to find the fecker and shoot it in the noggin after it does that.

yoshi88 14-09-2011 11:11 PM

A pest to who humans? The arrogance of my species astounds me sometimes. The only real pest on this planet is your own.

Besides that foxes provide an indirect economic benefit to farmers of at least £7 million annually by eating rabbits. Because fox benefits offset their costs, foxes are probably economically neutral to farmers. So even that is a myth, its all just nonsense so perverts can carry on being perverts and torturing them for fun.

headaball 14-09-2011 11:12 PM

Easy target as Lord Aaron says.

Visage 14-09-2011 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc. (Post 4562045)
Foxes are gross anyway.

Megan is alright though.

Mystic Mock 14-09-2011 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562178)
. The only real pest on this planet is your own.

So are you an alien then.:joker:

yoshi88 14-09-2011 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 4562193)
So are you an alien then.:joker:

Feels like it most days! :spin:

▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ 14-09-2011 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562178)
A pest to who humans? The arrogance of my species astounds me sometimes. The only real pest on this planet is your own.

Besides that foxes provide an indirect economic benefit to farmers of at least £7 million annually by eating rabbits. Because fox benefits offset their costs, foxes are probably economically neutral to farmers. So even that is a myth, its all just nonsense so perverts can carry on being perverts and torturing them for fun.

You genuinely don't have a clue what you are talking about, for every rabbit a fox eats there are 500 more eating our crops. I live on a farm, all my family are farmers, they have cost us countless of thousands over the past few years, along with rabbits, which I happily manage also. I take no pleasure in it, it is necessary. If you had it your way we'd all be vegan, but the rabbits would have eaten all our crops, because presumably you wouldn't want us managing them either, so we'd just starve to death.
Anyway PM me if you want me to educate you any more because this is totally off topic now

Mystic Mock 14-09-2011 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi88 (Post 4562197)
Feels like it most days! :spin:

:joker: In all seriousness I do agree with you that killing Foxes when they aint even near your land is quite vile,but the Governments will never give in to what the majority of the normal everyday people want as they are the people living in the countryside killing foxes for fun.

I still dont think Pamela Anderson should have been allowed to tell the rest of the house about Harry Foxhunting in the outside world,although I still think Harry would have been up for eviction anyway.

Kazanne 14-09-2011 11:23 PM

Must admit I have great difficulty getting past the fox hunting that Harry does,and what was Jay rattling about more or less saying that it's ok to kill an animal as long as you eat it,LOL idiot(no one needs to kill to eat today)so his objection to Harrys foxhunting didn't make sense.Harry seems to be a nice bloke,but it would go against my beliefs to support him.

yoshi88 14-09-2011 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ (Post 4562202)
You genuinely don't have a clue what you are talking about. I live on a farm, all my family are farmers, they have cost us countless of thousands over the past few years.
Anyway PM me if you want me to educate you any more because this is totally off topic now

Farmer is like like a euphemism for someone who profits from exploiting animals?

I don't think it would be a unbiased education somehow so I will pass thanks.

yoshi88 14-09-2011 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ▲¯\_(ツ)_/¯▲ (Post 4562202)
You genuinely don't have a clue what you are talking about, for every rabbit a fox eats there are 500 more eating our crops. I live on a farm, all my family are farmers, they have cost us countless of thousands over the past few years, along with rabbits, which I happily manage also. I take no pleasure in it, it is necessary. If you had it your way we'd all be vegan, but the rabbits would have eaten all our crops, because presumably you wouldn't want us managing them either, so we'd just starve to death.
Anyway PM me if you want me to educate you any more because this is totally off topic now

:hugesmile: maybe you should stop killing the foxes then.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.