![]() |
I've got a thoery!
Me and my boyfriend agree that the eviction safe list was read out BACKWARDS from who had lest to most of the four.
Therfore the voting would have been Deana (most) Luke A. Adam Sara (least of the four) I honetly believe that's the order of who got most votes. |
I agree. They did the same during CBB as well
|
Could be! but Luke A couldve gotten more votes
|
Its plausible :)
|
I think so too!
|
I think it's very possible which means the voting could've gone like this.
1st Deana 2nd Luke A 3rd Adam 4th Sara 5th Conor 6th Ashleigh 7th Luke S 8th Caroline For anyone that's interested. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I agree!
|
But Sara got the most cheers! so it could have been read out randomly or in order
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That is a good point.
|
It was ALL read out in reverse order, Luke S got the most votes tonight.
|
This is definitely what happened... no doubt in my mind..
|
Glad they didn't announce who'd got the most votes and yes I believe that is true.
|
You have a glorious chest.
|
We will never know for sure but I think that with the votes all split all over the place, that Sara likely had the most votes,creeping through the voting somehow, I feel sure had Deana got the most votes it would have been said.
Surprised they have gone back to the in no partucular order for this one, also surprised the vote lines were closed and re-opened twice too, seemed a bit ridiculous to me and I cannot help feeling that an 'engineered' result as to who went has been tried tonight. 8 were up for eviction,all the phone lines should have been closed for all of them at the same time,that is the only fair way to determine a result of an eviction,this wasn't after all finals night. |
Quote:
she doesnt have haters so the cheering for her would be crystal clear |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Welcome to the club, I'll have Novo put you on the list http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...86_634x352.jpg |
of course they had to announce it in no particular order
other wise it would clearly show who will win because all the of the most popular hms were up but deep down we all know Deana topped the votes again |
of course they had to announce it in no particular order
other wise it would clearly show who will win because all the of the most popular hms were up but deep down we all know Deana topped the votes again |
This is actually the first time since it went to Channel 5 that they have announced the results of an eviction of 3 or more housemates in no particular order,all last series they said who topped the votes.
Mainly that was Aaron everytime he was up, they announced who topped the votes too in the 3 way eviction this series the first week and also in the 4 way eviction when Deana topped those votes. So I doubt many expected them to announce this result in no particular order. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think it was in reverse orders too, I actually thought that during the show, I mean, its almost the exact order of the polls. |
It wouldn't matter if it was 3,4,5,6,7,8,9 pr them all up, they have never announced the results on Channel 5 in no particular order until last night.
They will have their reasons for not doing so but it was simply a multiple eviction where most were up not all of them. I for one am as near 100% sure as I could be that had Deana topped the votes, it would have been most certainly been said she did, I think BB got a surprise result for them last night in the voting,hence the re-opening of the phone lines, no need for that in an eviction vote either and none of that even indicated as to being what was going to happen either. Last year it never mattered how many were up, they always said who topped the votes in every eviction of 3 or more housemates,no matter how many were up for eviction and there were a few evictions that had more than 4 housemates up in that series. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.