![]() |
I honestly don't get why people want Sam to win
Yes, he is nice. Yes, I like him. But he hasn't done anything much to warrant being voted the winner. Imagine if we had a season of people that were just like him, it would be dull and people would moan to hell, so I don't get why people are backing him as a winner this time? This is BB, an entertainment show and a gameshow, not be as nice as you can and cruise though 10 weeks of TV to be given money for doing so.
|
It worked for Rachel Rice and Cameron in BB4.
I agree though, he isn't a worthy winner but if people vote for him he could easily win |
Agreed. Sam makes even Cameron and Rachel Rice interesting. :joker::joker:
|
I want Sam to win:devil:
|
Rachel Rice was always interesting.
I don't actively want Sam to win, but I wouldn't mind it. He'd still be better than about half the godawful winners we've had. I'll settle with anything as long as Jack and Joe don't win. |
sympathy vote
|
Quote:
|
I keep asking Sam supporters this and they either never answer the question or give sarcy answers.
I would love to hear genuine reason as to why he should win. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
what reasons do you want him to win? |
Quote:
For me he would be the worst of all the past winners, even worse than Rachel Rice and Anthony Hutton, and they are tough acts to follow. |
Quote:
They are all reprobates and wannabes. Rewarding anyone for being so does not sit well with me. Sam has conquered and is dealing with difficulty every single day, the the others and loads of this forum could not even dream of. He is a nice young lad who would put the money to good use. He has my respect. I don't really give a toss who wins. But if I had to choose, it would be him. |
He's the most boring non-entity ever to have got this far, even worse than Rachel and Cameron. They were boring but at least they had their own personalities. Sam is a frigging bore lord who is blander than bland. If he wins I'm gonna kick a puppy.
|
He'd be better because this show has a ****ing horrible track record for winners and half of them are repulsive in one way or another. Sam being completely inoffensive makes him one of the better winners by default.
|
Quote:
Sam would be the most pointless winner ever. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I like Sam, great lad so far.
Best reason of all I can give for him winning is.... Dexter won't:joker::joker::joker: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I donīt want him to win. But if it comes down to it that he is the last hope to prevent Gina from winning, i have to hope he does.
It doesnīt mean that i support him, it means i do not want Gina to win. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
idk it just seems counter intuitive for me to want someone to win who I absolutely did not enjoy viewing for 2-3 months, which qualifies at least half of the winners this show has had.
|
Quote:
So, he is deaf, but others are dealing with difficulties too, it is not a reason for ANY housemate to win. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's a game show!
He's not contributed to the game. He barely speaks! Even now, he has about 3 lines on the HL show and there's only 7 housemates left! No doubt, he's a lovely guy but he's boring. Unfortunately, he will win |
I want Gina to have the title & Sam to have the prizefund
|
Quote:
It's not a 100m sprint, its a gameshow as pointed out. There is no reason to exclude anyone from that house based on any physical differences. It would probably be illegal to do so. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.