Which Unfair Twist did you hate the most?
 

wait for poll :pipe:

As dire as they both were Sam's eviction edges it because at least we knew 4in4out was going to happen but both are incredibly flawed

I seriously hated both of them

4 in 4 out was miles more unfair so that one.

Both are awful

4in4out. Even tho it got rid of Kieran.

Only just remembered the 4 out were the ones who didnt even get nominated.. What even is this show.

This.

1. We had no clue
2.It wasn't a public vote and people spent money to save Sam by evicting others.
3.Sam had no chance of staying even if she had 1k..

I would have said the same about Jack too.

Both!

They should have learnt their lesson after Danielle's eviction last year

Tonight. At least we got a say in the 4 out thing

Yes this!
It would have been unfair for Kimbot too but it seemed a lot more unfair on Danielle due to the fact they was going to evict Kim then suddenly she got ill. They should have cancelled the eviction tbqn(even if anyone walked that week)

Both

its got to be tonights fix, it wasn't a twist. They decided that Sam was going

Both but Sam's eviction was a whole new low that I didn't even think was possible for BBUK

It should have been done differently and fair, because it was obvious Sam was going to get the boot because everyone knows she has been a target during her stay!

4in/4out ruined any potential the series had, yet Sam's eviction just felt like a new low point and a bit sad really

Both.

But if I had to chose, 4in4out. As that ruined the series.

Why didn't those losers kick Jack out!

Meant to click cashbomb. 4 out was ace

4in4out from the housemates perspective.

Tonight from a viewers perspective.

I mean obviously I hated 4in4out too but that technically wasn't "unfair", we did actually get to vote in that.

This, and Danielle last year, is a pisstake.

Cashbomb

Both but I hated 4in4out because my fave hm was evicted without even being up.

2 of those hm's, Keiran and Harriet, went without picking up a single nom.

neither loved them both and its ended well.

Def the 4-4 when you look at who we got then apart from marc what did the others really offer in comparison to the possibility's from those they replaced.Personally I would have liked to view Harriet's progress for longer Sarah losing her temper and BB conspiring to cause an argument between the twins.

Imo the smart move would have been to just replace Kieran with Marc.Could you imagine the above four going after him I could almost feel sorry for the guy and it would have been great to watch.

Four in four out.

I really liked Kieran and was warming to the Twins, when they were cruelly axed.

I liked every twist. ...they were real head f-ck twists. ...shame we didnt have a house full of marcs and jades to do them. ....bb tried so hard to inject some life into those house mates but just like so many of the voters, they didnt understand the actual premis of the show

Brilliant twists aren't enough ....brilliant house mates are the essential ingredient. ..The twists were good ...esp the money ones

4 in 4 out. It just completely changed the series in completely the wrong ways.

They are not even in same boat so i dunno why people are trying to quantify them as such. 4 out 4 in was voted by the public and done legit as big brother states.

Sam's eviction was a total joke. Not to mention a 100% fix that BB knew it would be Sam regardless of what was gonna happen. If Chloe had 50k and Sam 1p she would still of gone. The Clique had the outvote power regardless. It was totally unfair and against BB without being voted for by the public.

Sam's eviction.

"You Decide!"

...Not anymore...

I dont agree...i think it saved the show..it gave us MARC...if he hadn't gone in then this years BB would have been the final nail in its own coffin....even if you didn't like him you have to realise he provided a platform and a profile for other housemates who had been invisible to that point like Danny and Chloe.

BB had to twist it that week because the housemates had put all the good game players up for eviction AGAIN and saved all the ones who were playing it safer

I can't be sure after so long, but i think we stood to lose Jade, Aaron, Eileen, Nick, Joel, Jack and Christian...3 of the housemates a lot of people are now listing in their ideal top 5 and 4 of the housemates we have all put in the final..

I think BB moved fast and were effective in diverting an even worse show than people are complaining about now

Ironically the only 2 finalists not in that original power gang are Danny and Chloe which for me, explains a lot....a reminder of how little they were giving us before Marc arrived

4in4out just downright ruined it.

If you don't think its acceptable then why are you still here...watching, discussing. moaning....?
BB are the gaffer, they have to be played the same as the other house mates and the public have to be played...the remaining house mates have played all 3 of those opponents better than anyone else and thats why they are the finalists...if BB decided to eject Sam then its because she wasn't a good enough game player...simple...i don't believe all this ''its a fix'' sour grapes but if it was a fix then why didn't they pick Chloe or Danny or joel etc...the answer is because they have been better game players than Sam

God knows BB have to have some involvement in steering the show...the voters are total morons a lot of them..last time BB left it totally up to the public we had the dreaded BB 4....Is that what you would prefer ?

Sam only lasted so long because Marc took a shine to her ..she bathed in his glory...she hasn't worked at all to deserve a place in the final...and sometimes if you don't work hard enough you get the sack

Apart from Sarah and possibly Harriet the housemates that went weren't too bad but 4? Really?
And Marc is literally one of the most overrated housemates ever. Plus he would have been going in at some point so I don't see how it makes a difference.

both, but 4in4out just murdered this series. The most awful twist they could ever come up with.

Both. But especially Sam getting evicted as the public didn't get a say in it

If you only back the females then you don't actually play the game do you .?
Might as well just watch Loose Women.
All this men vs women rubbish....its not 1946....

4 in 4 out as it ruined the series for me

Sam by far. One of my two remaining favourites had only just been evicted and then out of the blue they go and rub it in with one of the most unfair of **** twists in the big brother history books.

Loved the 4 out/4 in twist though, but would've loved it a lot more if it had just been 2 out (ideal choice being Chloe and Danny)/4 in.