whats the difference between rachel rice and chloe?
 

rachel liked chickpeas:sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep ::sleep::sleep::sleep:

nothing they both sucked.

Lisa was robbed

They're both two of the best winners ever <3

One won BB9 and the other won BB16 :clap1:

Rachel was nice, dull but nIce, Chloe was nastily dull.

wasn't too gone on gilberta grape - she was too sweet to be wholesome

chloe on the other hand was completely natural - fun loving, cheerful, but showed her strong side when she had to. The best person to win this year - her or Harry.

Rachel Rice was an absolute phenomenal human being that doesn't get the respect she rightly deserves. People seem to forget she was the only person that actually stood up to that grotesque beast that was Alexandra and put Luke firmly in place :clap1:

Both bores.

Whether she was boring or not Rachel was actually just a lovely girl.

The same cannot be said about Chloe. I found no redeeming qualities in her at all. She was pretty much forced on us through good edits whilst a lot of the rest were getting slaughtered. A lot of the voters only watch the highlight shows and, this year more than any, they were very biased towards certain housemates in the edit, tasks etc. it's a case of "if your face fits".

:umm2:

Rachel wasn't a lying criminal.

One had a lisp, the other didn't.

Rachel was the more entertaining, nicer and the prettier one, imo.

I liked Rachel, Chloe i didn't

They aren't even remotely alike as housemates. Chloe was her own woman, got stuck into all the tasks, argued her corner, viciously supported her friends, was liked by all the housemates, showed strength honesty and maturity. She didn't pretend to be anything she wasn't

Rachel sat on a fence in the happy happy house, smiling sweetly and for the most part hardly having any opinion on anything. This is possibly the first year in ages I liked the winner and was happy she won

i am right behind blue on this one - think eaxactly the same - how anyone can compare the 2 beats me.


have a good day blueyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

~Confronting all of Alexandra, Luke, Bex and Jennifer is now construed as fence sitting~

Rachel was in a much much much much much much better series. And I know people slate her for being dull but I really liked her.

It's their opinion

how can you say chloe was her own woman when she was to scared to take the 20g because of how the others might have reacted, thats not being yourself!

Plus she needed dannys approval for everything she did.

The lithp.

which one cause i'm sure both them have, unless chloes is a cleft gob.

Sorry Eoin, I'm running a little slow today... Great minds and all that though...

One won the year REX was the star of the show and one won the year MARC was the star of the show..

Oh, and in the year Rachel won, BB didn't dish the dirt on the private lives of two of her competitors 2 days before the final, while at the same time omitting to disclose the winners even murkier and unpleasant past....seems that all the Chloe fans conspiracy theories about Marc, Danny, Jack and then Joel being primed to win were incorrect after all..and in fact, at the very last minute, BB sabotaged two of the others chances, while at the same time protecting Chloe....if she had won fair and square then it would not be so bad...but she didn't.....did she ?

well said redcrop, i hadn't thought of that.

Thank god someone else knows the truth. :clap2:

This "Rachel never spoke her mind" thing is a complete and utter fabrication. As you say, she was one of the only people (the others being Stephanie and Kathreya) to actually speak up during Chipgate (despite obviously being intimidated by Alexandra), while most of the others were happy to just sit back in silence.

As for the comparison with Chloe, I don't see it at all. They're not even slightly similar.

Slander. She could use some of her winning to take you to court and be an even bigger cash winner.

She never sat on the fence she DOES have a conscience. She argued her points and she certainly did not need Dannys approval she fought with him didn't she. My opinion only Parmy. You have yours. Peace :wavey:

Rachel could take me to court for saying she isn't a lying criminal?:shrug:

one like grapes and the other one attack a person weight constalty and put on fake tears and fooled the entire dumbass viewers who actually think chloe is a nice girl. Lets be honest if jack holla at her in real life at the club she would laugh her at her.

Both queens and deserving winners.

This for me.

Some really good observations and points you make here,I agree particularly, this last week we did have Chloe thrust on us in the highlights, all done in a positive light too.