![]() |
Government has Ruled NO 2nd Referendum
Government
Has said we must respect the voters Bliss LBC : Live |
Are they gonna do that when 52% vote to leave the UK from Scotland? Or is the 60% or more gonna come into play conveniently at that vote?
|
Good, the voters have made their beds and now they've got to lie in them.
|
Perhaps it is all of Parliaments MPs who should actually be saying that via a vote held in the House of Commons,since this was an all party campaign as to both sides.
Not just the government's. I thought part of the leave argument was to bring to the UK more sovereignty and democracy back to Parliament, not just hand all on a plate to existing government and ignoring all other Parties and MPs views. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It wasn't a feature last time so after this mess too of a EU vote result,I cannot see how they can force conditions on that now in the future as to a 2nd referendum. I am also pleased that Ruth Davidson the leader of the Scottish Conservatives has said, that Westminster should not try to block a 2nd referendum vote in Scotland if it comes to pass through Holyrood. That would be real and pure hypocrisy. You had good reasons why you did not vote too, I know that, so please ignore lectures you may get. Margaret Thatcher it was who believed that those who did not vote, gave consent to the status quo. Love her or hate her, it is a pity we no longer have any politician like her now, one who really led her party and looked not only at things won and lost but how they were won or lost too. A lot more voted when she was active in Politics too. |
The EU result is only a mess to those who didn't want it. Sadly for them, not enough remainers voted. That's how it works.
|
Quote:
We all have made that choice, when you put your mark next to remain you agreed to the majority decision consider your bed made now get on with making the country great again we need dooers not moaners |
Quote:
|
So anyone voting Conservative in a general election and getting Labour one should just shut up and get on with it and not moan at the govt.
Likewise vice versa if those voting Labour end up with a Conservative one. What an odd democracy that is, if your real concerns and worries have to be suppressed just because of a vote. Whoever won this referendum should have been the one who got at least 50% of eligible voters for it. Funny how conditions like that can be made to apply to Unions and strike action but not for a major decision as this was. |
Quote:
(p.s. I did not want to use just one emoticon, because I did not want you telling Marsh that I had given you the clap :hee:) |
Quote:
|
Plus, try as I might I am yet to find anything or anyone who has actually pointed out any positives in this situation whatsoever? "Britain will be great again." Lovely. How?
|
Quote:
|
64% of 18-24s did not vote
if anyone is looking for a scapegoat I give you them |
Quote:
|
18-24: 36%
25-34: 58% 35-44: 72% 45-54: 75% 55-64: 81% 65+: 83% |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Today Scotland is part of the UK it up to Them to Join the € Until then - they are Chicken I have done a thread on that in Chat and Games |
Quote:
But all the Polling and the bloody US President Bullying us they thought they had it in the bag, But so many folks had waited YEARS for this I knew the Result before 7AM that day I could Feel it |
Quote:
The country I live in had better financial security, apparently 46% less racial attacks and not the potential to have a prime minister who is against human rights, pro fox hunting, against gay marriage and maternity leave and minimum wages for small businesses. |
Quote:
Its way way too soon to make any financial call as we are still in the EU for 2 years and i think its very very unlikely that leadsom will win Dont forget we got Gordon Brown as a PM once and Tony Blair started a war to be pals with George Bush :umm2: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
reported incidents to a website with no investigation if true is hardly a problem Have you noticed an increase in racism in the Spar or around your locale? |
Quote:
Aside from that, it still doesn't take away from the fact that the country has and never did have any idea of what to do in this eventuality. The government frantically having to rearrange itself is not a good thing, especially when people's livelihoods, living costs and general day to day living expenses are at risk. |
Quote:
what do you mean? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"If there's been an increase in the sort of things that go on in Boston then yes, it is a very real problem." that does not make sense. I take it Boston is your local town? |
One in six in Boston are foreign-born after influx of Eastern Europeans
Town was rated worst for integration in research comparing 160 places Migrants have been drawn to area by the many agricultural and factory jobs Figures showed town had highest number of killings per 100,000 people Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz4Dv41AliZ god it sounds vile |
Quote:
The migrants are drawn to Boston and the surrounding areas, as the article states, by the large number of land and factory jobs that the geographical location provides. Worth pointing out as well that the benefits ratio of Boston is also astronomical and it's certainly nothing to do with the fact that there aren't jobs available. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.