ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB18 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=698)
-   -   James topped the vote btw - 2% was between Marnie and Bear (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=307734)

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:00 PM

James topped the vote btw - 2% was between Marnie and Bear
 
No one who was that far ahead on the polls could not have topped that vote. Even Jason was closer to Hughie than Bear or Marnie were to James.

He was never going anywhere.

thisisdanny 12-08-2016 09:01 PM

Why are you interested I thought you were writing your letter to Ofcom about tonight's eviction

Withano 12-08-2016 09:04 PM

Your logic is a bit weird.

Beso 12-08-2016 09:08 PM

easy shout really, thank you marmite.

rusticgal 12-08-2016 09:08 PM

You don't know that...no particular order..:shrug:

Vanessa 12-08-2016 09:09 PM

Hope Marnie goes. :hehe: I like Chloe more.

Marcus. 12-08-2016 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanessa (Post 8910203)
Hope Marnie goes. :hehe: I like Chloe more.

really why :conf:

Amy Jade 12-08-2016 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 8910201)
You don't know that...no particular order..:shrug:

Yaki Dar knows all :umm2:

Shaun 12-08-2016 09:14 PM

Considering Saira was about 10% ahead of Bear and 17% ahead of Lewis in the same poll, I am hesitant to believe this. :(

rusticgal 12-08-2016 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 8910221)
Yaki Dar knows all :umm2:


Ooooops...silly me :laugh:

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 8910167)
Your logic is a bit weird.

How so? Emma said there was 2% between the 2 who were vying for the other space in the bottom 2.

Chloe was almost certainly already there. Every poll and facebook likes and twitter retweets suggested James topped the vote and the 2% would have therefore been between Marnie and Bear.

thisisdanny 12-08-2016 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yaki da (Post 8910257)
How so? Emma said there was 2% between the 2 who were vying for the other space in the bottom 2.

Chloe was almost certainly already there. Every poll and facebook likes and twitter retweets suggested James topped the vote and the 2% would have therefore been between Marnie and Bear.

She didn't say that at all she just said between 2 housemates, she didn't specify which order these 2 housemates were.

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thisisdanny (Post 8910268)
She didn't say that at all she just said between 2 housemates, she didn't specify which order these 2 housemates were.

It's perfectly obvious. If 2 people are going to be in danger she will only mention that if there's 2% between the housemates in 2nd and 3rd position, as that is relevant to who might end up in that bottom 2.

Now every poll, the facebook likes, and the twitter retweets had James top by a big margin, Chloe bottom and it very close between Marnie and Bear. As such it is easy to deduce that the 2% for the second spot in the bottom 2 was between Marnie and Bear.

Withano 12-08-2016 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yaki da (Post 8910257)
How so? Emma said there was 2% between the 2 who were vying for the other space in the bottom 2.

Chloe was almost certainly already there. Every poll and facebook likes and twitter retweets suggested James topped the vote and the 2% would have therefore been between Marnie and Bear.

She never said that, she said just a minte ago there was just 2% between two of the housemates so your vote counts, remember you're voting to save. No indication at all which posistion or housemates this was in reference to.. Thats why your logic is a bit weird.

chuff me dizzy 12-08-2016 09:27 PM

Said in no particular order

thisisdanny 12-08-2016 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yaki da (Post 8910284)
It's perfectly obvious. If 2 people are going to be in danger she will only mention that if there's 2% between the housemates in 2nd and 3rd position, as that is relevant to who might end up in that bottom 2.

Now every poll, the facebook likes, and the twitter retweets had James top by a big margin, Chloe bottom and it very close between Marnie and Bear. As such it is easy to deduce that the 2% for the second spot in the bottom 2 was between Marnie and Bear.

Facebook is your source? oops

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 8910288)
She never said that, she said just a minte ago there was just 2% between two of the housemates so your vote counts

Yes, between second and third. No other reason to mention it.

Quote:

No indication between at all which posistion or housemates this was in reference to.. Thats why your logic is a bit weird.
She would not mention it unless it was relevant to who ended up in the bottom 2. So the 2% was between the 2nd and 3rd place and every poll had it very close between Marnie and Bear. Therefore one can assume James topped the vote, Chloe was bottom and the 2% Emma was referring to was between Marnie and Bear.

Beso 12-08-2016 09:29 PM

yaki is correct...........yet again.

reece(: 12-08-2016 09:29 PM

Legend James wins

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thisisdanny (Post 8910294)
Facebook is your source? oops

The polls, facebook likes and twitter retweets which collectively can give you a very good idea of how the voting is going.

thisisdanny 12-08-2016 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yaki da (Post 8910300)
She would not mention it unless it was relevant to who ended up in the bottom 2. So the 2% was between the 2nd and 3rd place and every poll had it very close between Marnie and Bear. Therefore one can assume James topped the vote, Chloe was bottom and the 2% Emma was referring to was between Marnie and Bear.

Next week she could say there's 1% in it, but might not specify a place - it's just so people will pick up the phone so they get more money.

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thisisdanny (Post 8910314)
Next week she could say there's 1% in it, but might not specify a place - it's just so people will pick up the phone so they get more money.

Doubtful. All evidence points to James topping and it being close between Bear (2nd) and Marnie (3rd)

thisisdanny 12-08-2016 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yaki da (Post 8910308)
The polls, facebook likes and twitter retweets which collectively can give you a very good idea of how the voting is going.

An idea is not fact

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 8910301)
yaki is correct...........yet again.

Of course. But try explaining this to these people.

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:40 PM

Confirmed. Thank you.

Withano 12-08-2016 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yaki da (Post 8910300)
Yes, between second and third. No other reason to mention it.



She would not mention it unless it was relevant to who ended up in the bottom 2. So the 2% was between the 2nd and 3rd place and every poll had it very close between Marnie and Bear. Therefore one can assume James topped the vote, Chloe was bottom and the 2% Emma was referring to was between Marnie and Bear.

The complete opposite is true really, if it was between 2nd a 3rd she would have said that it was as an incentive to vote.

Yaki da 12-08-2016 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 8910519)
The complete opposite is true really, if it was between 2nd a 3rd she would have said that it was as an incentive to vote.

What are you on about?

Look, James topped the vote. Chloe came bottom. The 2% was between Marnie and Bear who were competing for 2nd place. Every poll suggested this would be the case, facebook likes did as well and twitter also.

Beso 12-08-2016 10:03 PM

eggy faces.

Withano 12-08-2016 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yaki da (Post 8910582)
What are you on about?

Look, James topped the vote. Chloe came bottom. The 2% was between Marnie and Bear who were competing for 2nd place. Every poll suggested this would be the case, facebook likes did as well and twitter also.

Yes we know the positions, we dont know who was separated by 2%. Just making a reasonable assumption that it wasnt between 2nd and 3rd as Emma would most likely tell us that it was as an incentive to vote

thisisdanny 12-08-2016 10:14 PM

Emma confirmed the position of the voting.

Emma did not confirm who the 2% was between. It might have been 1st/2nd, 2nd/3rd, or 3rd/4th. You are making an assumption.

Thank you.

thisisdanny 12-08-2016 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 8910726)
Yes we know the positions, we dont know who was separated by 2%. Just making a reasonable assumption that it wasnt between 2nd and 3rd as Emma would most likely tell us that it was as an incentive to vote

Precisely, she'd have said if it was between 2nd/3rd. I think it was between James and Bear tbh controversial opinion in this thread since Yaki is a confirmed truther

rusticgal 12-08-2016 10:16 PM

Fantastic news...so glad they made that publif knowledge too. Bear would have convinced himself he topped the vote :laugh:

Yaki da 12-08-2016 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thisisdanny (Post 8910779)
Emma confirmed the position of the voting.

Emma did not confirm who the 2% was between. It might have been 1st/2nd, 2nd/3rd, or 3rd/4th. You are making an assumption.

Thank you.

No reason to mention it unless there was something at stake between those two people who had 2% between them. Chloe was bottom and Marnie and Bear were competing to not be in that bottom 2 with her. That's why it was mentioned.

They wouldn't mention anything if the vote was Chloe 10% Marnie 12% and Bear 38% and James 40% as the bottom 2 would have been clear.

Yaki da 12-08-2016 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thisisdanny (Post 8910785)
Precisely, she'd have said if it was between 2nd/3rd. I think it was between James and Bear tbh controversial opinion in this thread since Yaki is a confirmed truther

She would not have mentioned it at all unless a place in the bottom was at stake between those who had 2% between them.

What am I dealing with here.

thisisdanny 12-08-2016 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yaki da (Post 8910859)
No reason to mention it unless there was something at stake between those two people who had 2% between them. Chloe was bottom and Marnie and Bear were competing to not be in that bottom 2 with her. That's why it was mentioned.

They wouldn't mention anything if the vote was Chloe 10% Marnie 12% and Bear 38% and James 40% as the bottom 2 would have been clear.

No reason? So the extra votes/money is not a reason ok eek


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.